Common, yes.Oh. So this is the common understanding of what an atheist is then?
But that doesn't equate to "all atheists without exception believe this."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Common, yes.Oh. So this is the common understanding of what an atheist is then?
Which atheists have a belief that at least one god exists?Common, yes.
But that doesn't equate to "all atheists without exception believe this."
Well if you use the word 'atheist' as Dawkins, Hitchens and many other popular writers have done all theists would be in that group.Which atheists have a belief that at least one god exists?
Even if none, it isn't because it's the common understanding. 'Common' just references a generality.Which atheists have a belief that at least one god exists?
Doesn't believe in GODS! GODS! PLURAL! AS IN ALL GODS! EVERY GOD! After all these posts you haven't even picked that up!?I would think 'Doesn't believe in God' to be a more common definition of 'atheism - and less problematic.
I am not obliged to pick it up mate. I don't think your definition is either common, or particularly sound.Doesn't believe in GODS! GODS! PLURAL! AS IN ALL GODS! EVERY GOD! After all these posts you haven't even picked that up!?
LOL a theist is a person who believes at least one god exists, an atheist doesn't believe any gods exist. Of course you can say that a person is a theist regarding one god and an atheist regarding all other gods but that is just word play with no bearing on the definitions.So according to that usage, all theists are atheists that believe one God exists.
What on earth made you think you can make other people adopt your prefered definition?LOL a theist is a person who believes at least one god exists, an atheist doesn't believe any gods exist. Of course you can say that a person is a theist regarding one god and an atheist regarding all other gods but that is just word play with no bearing on the definitions.
If you believe gods don't exist then just say you're a "strong atheist" because the definition of a "strong atheist" is a person who believes gods don't exist. Continuing using "atheist" when you mean "strong atheist" will just make you look foolish in the eyes of every knowledgeable atheist and confirm the biblical definition.I am not obliged to pick it up mate. I don't think your definition is either common, or particularly sound.
Why would I have to use the definition you insist on, even though it does not reflect my position?
No it won't mate. The whole 'strong and weak' atheism idea is not very popular at all, in fact it is mostly found only in Christian apologetics, not in the atheist community. Personally I think it is a useless distinction.If you believe gods don't exist then just say you're a "strong atheist" because the definition of a "strong atheist" is a person who believes gods don't exist. Continuing using "atheist" when you mean "strong atheist" will just make you look foolish in the eyes of every knowledgeable atheist and confirm the biblical definition.
I don't think I can make other people adopt that definition. If you want to look like a fool in the eyes of every atheist who knows the difference between weak and strong atheism please feel free.What on earth made you think you can make other people adopt your prefered definition?
Why would I even care ? Words have many meanings - just ask whoever you are talking to what they mean.I don't think I can make other people adopt that definition. If you want to look like a fool in the eyes of every atheist who knows the difference between weak and strong atheism please feel free.
LOL! A person who doesn't believe gods exist is a weak atheist. We just don't bother to say "weak".No it won't mate. The whole 'strong and weak' atheism idea is not very popular at all, in fact it is mostly found only in Christian apologetics, not in the atheist community. Personally I think it is a useless distinction.
This is going nowhere buddy.LOL! A person who doesn't believe gods exist is a weak atheist. We just don't bother to say "weak".
Correct. Let's stop here.This is going nowhere buddy.
Actually, we've expressed our concerns and disagreements with the definition on this website, and it wasn't heard. The high priests of atheism have decided what the definition should be.Nobody asked me....
The word a-the-ist isn't plural for "God". It's not even singular. Besides, the word "God" didn't exist when the word "atheos" (singular, athei plural) was used the first time. So how can we even be sure that "theos" should be translated to the 17th c. proto-Germanic/old-English God or gods?Doesn't believe in GODS! GODS! PLURAL! AS IN ALL GODS! EVERY GOD! After all these posts you haven't even picked that up!?