nazz
Doubting Thomas
You missed my point completelySo call me anti-Muslim. It would be a cheap shot and incorrect, but at least it would be a term that conveyed meaning.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You missed my point completelySo call me anti-Muslim. It would be a cheap shot and incorrect, but at least it would be a term that conveyed meaning.
If you think it is rational to assume that people who oppose anti-Muslim bigotry are opposed to any criticism of Islam you are nuts.Sure th we are a number of terms available: Rational, logical, clear headed....use any of the three you like, I won't take offense.
Note: I suggested using anti-Muslim, just not Islamophobia.
Another example of why 'Islamophobia' is a stupid word.
Islam is often violent, and millions of Muslims do support death to apostates. Simple fact.
If you say Islam is MOSTLY violent or ALL Muslims support death to apostates then that is obviously wrong, bigoted and stupid to believe. But the word 'Islamophobia' doesn't allow you to make this distinction without excessive additional explanation. It really amazes me that people can't see this.
Honestly, forget about labels like 'Islamophobic' and just explain things as they are. It might take a few more words, but it will be far more accurate and effective.
If someone is being hyperbolic, paranoid or bigoted, point this out and explain why they are being so. There is no situation in which the word Islamophobia could not be replaced by a more accurate and effective combination of other words.
I'll direct you back to the Pew poll that indicates that a significant percentage of Muslims DO agree that apostasy is a crime. Not a majority overall, but a majority in some countries.
This is one of the main problems I have with Islam. It is not simply a religion, it is a totalitarian ideology. If you disagree, I'd ask you to cite a few Muslim majority countries in which religious minorities are not under severe persecution...
That looks like grasping at straws to me. You might as well deny that, say, Americans support literacy with much the same arguments.
I do find it fascinating that one can generalize about Muslims and Islam when it suits them or does not paint either in a less than stellar light. A tiny double-standard at play.That looks like grasping at straws to me. You might as well deny that, say, Americans support literacy with much the same arguments.
"Islamophobia" is a useful term. It describes a mindset that is prevalent in the world right now. It is not a stupid word.
"Islam" is not often violent, but yes, millions of Muslims do support death to apostates. There's no problem pointing that out, and it's not Islamophobic. What counts as Islamophobia is, as you say, saying "Islam is violent", or "Muslims are violent", or "Islam is like the mafia: it'll kill you for crossing it".
The key words there are "not a majority". I specified this already. If it's only a minority, you can't say "Muslims" or "the Islamic world". When you do, you're overgeneralizing.
Your second paragraph is much the same. Your problem isn't with Islam; it's with a harsh culture in some Muslim countries. Blaming a religion that includes 1.5 billion people all over the world, most of whom don't support that kind of thing is problematic and is an example of Islamophobia. It's that kind of thing that leads to retaliation against innocent Muslims, which only makes it easier for groups like ISIS to recruit members. "See? They hate you for being Muslim. Come fight with us."
I do find it fascinating that one can generalize about Muslims and Islam when it suits them or does not paint either in a less than stellar light. A tiny double-standard at play.
If you think it is rational to assume that people who oppose anti-Muslim bigotry are opposed to any criticism of Islam you are nuts.
That doesn't follow. We're talking about stuff that is only supported by a minority, or at best a small majority.
but 10% of 1.5 billion human animals still equals 150 Million people. It took, what 20, to do 9/11?That doesn't follow. We're talking about stuff that is only supported by a minority, or at best a small majority.
Right, you can say "Islam is a religion of peace" without any pushback.
As long as you use the trademark symbol.Right, you can say "Islam is a religion of peace" without any pushback.
Does that claim lead to violence or discrimination?
I think it is just an example of the obscure nature of Muslim humor.Does that claim lead to violence or discrimination?
1. Islam, the religion, teaches death to apostates.
2. Saying Islam is violent is not equivalent to saying Muslims are violent, certainly we can see that most Muslims are not violent.
3. The religion of Islam can't reasonably be separated from Islamic states and cultures.
I think it is just an example of the obscure nature of Muslim humor.
Death for apostasy and punishment of blasphemy is a mainstream position in Islam.
"Islam" does not teach anything. Muslims teach things and call it "Islam". And those teachings are not all in agreement just as with any other religion. "Islam" is not violent; some Muslims are. As for #3 there is more to religion than government and culture. According to some Muslims some governments and aspects of culture are not Islamic.1. Islam, the religion, teaches death to apostates.
2. Saying Islam is violent is not equivalent to saying Muslims are violent, certainly we can see that most Muslims are not violent.
3. The religion of Islam can't reasonably be separated from Islamic states and cultures.
but 10% of 1.5 billion human animals still equals 150 Million people. It took, what 20, to do 9/11?
Let me know if you need another bushel of straw.Whether or not that's true, it's still inaccurate to say Muslims or the Muslims world support those things.