Trailblazer
Veteran Member
No, that is not terrible. What is terrible is closing hearts to God if the message comes through anyone other than Jesus.But is it so terrible if it opens hearts to God?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, that is not terrible. What is terrible is closing hearts to God if the message comes through anyone other than Jesus.But is it so terrible if it opens hearts to God?
It's not long and it's very tightly wordedAnd the New Testament is not wordy?
Read the NT. You'll get it. Or not. I don't care. Too many words. You guys are all about words. But you don't want to listen or understand anyone elseWhat does that mean, go deeper?
He speaks to all that take time to listen.
Ok.Armies of the Word, not the Sword.
Baha'u'llah said
"The aim of this Wronged One in sustaining woes and tribulations, in revealing the Holy Verses and in demonstrating proofs hath been naught but to quench the flame of hate and enmity, that the horizon of the hearts of men may be illumined with the light of concord and attain real peace and tranquillity.
The Enemy you face will embrace all in Love and Unity on a global scale.
"That one indeed is a man who, today, dedicateth himself to the service of the entire human race. The Great Being saith: Blessed and happy is he that ariseth to promote the best interests of the peoples and kindreds of the earth. In another passage He hath proclaimed: It is not for him to pride himself who loveth his own country, but rather for him who loveth the whole world. The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."
Regards Tony
And it is also not written by Jesus or anyone who knew Jesus.It's not long and it's very tightly worded
What are you apologising to me for? It's not my problem. But if you want to know what's in a book, read it. Don't ask someone else to explain it to you. You've already decided what to think, so ...Sorry. I cannot rely upon that for truth from God.
Well... It goes for a lot of Christians too. It is the attitude that they are in the right... God is on their side. They think they are a prophet of Israel condemning some evil people that are worshipping a false god.No he's ok, we're all just human when provoked.
It's just time to be honest that Christianity is regarded by Baha'i as the enemy number one, regardless of what else they say about respecting other faiths.
But you've said that no one can close your heart to the message of Baha'u'llah, and I know some who will never allow their heart to be closed to the message of Paul, on behalf of the teachings of Jesus. As long as those hearts are open by someone's words so the Spirit can work, all's good. Yes?No, that is not terrible. What is terrible is closing hearts to God if the message comes through anyone other than Jesus.
That is the Quandary of Faith. We can open our hearts to God, yet in the process make ourselves God by our self induced understandings of that Word.But is it so terrible if it opens hearts to God?
I believe in the teachings of Jesus, but I also believe in, at least most of, the teachings of Buddha, and Confucius, Laozi, and Krishna, and even some of what I've read to date of Mohammad and Baha’u’llah. And I intend to continue to explore what the sages have had to say, Ovid, Lucretius, St. Frances and what modern "thinkers" have contemplated, Emerson, Nehru, Gandhi, Rabbi Freeman, and on and on and on. In all of this, the only thing I do not like is attempting to set boundaries on God. He speaks to all that take time to listen.
Namaste
Yeah, they sure have lots of reading to get through. It would take a lifetime. No wonder they don't have time to read much else. Except to spend hours on forums arguing and proselytizing.Well... It goes for a lot of Christians too. It is the attitude that they are in the right... God is on their side. They think they are a prophet of Israel condemning some evil people that are worshipping a false god.
It happens with people that believe in a proselytizing type of religion... that believes they must preach the Word. So, what do we get when we have a Baha'i talking to a Evangelical type of Christian? They both "know" they are right. They both "know" what the "truth" about God and his plan. And say things like, "You're blind" "You are deceiving yourself into believing" and so on.
And both sides can justify on coming down hard on people. The Christian believe they are trying to save a sinner from going to hell.
The Baha'i is trying to spread their "truth" that all religions are one and that one religion can't put their prophet and religion over another. So, they believe it is wrong not to love Muhammad, the Buddha and all the other manifestations. But do they? Do they really? Especially Jesus?
Do they really know what the Buddha taught? Or what Jesus taught? Or Muhammad?
To make all these religions "one", they have to water down some of the teachings and beliefs. If a Christian believes that Jesus is God? That has to go. If a Christian believes in the literal Creation story or the Flood? That has to go? If they believe the Isaac, not Ishmael, was the son taken by Abraham to be sacrificed? That has to go. The whole plan of salvation of Born Again Christians? Has to go. The belief that Jesus came back to life in some type of flesh and bone body? That has to go. That Jesus, himself, is coming back? That has to go.
And then the one more... If a Christian believes that Jesus is the only way? That has to go. The Baha'i truth makes Muhammad, Buddha, Jesus, Abraham, all of the people they claim are manifestations of God... equal.
A Christian has to let go of all those beliefs. Some have. Some have gone for the more inclusive beliefs of the Baha'i Faith. But really, I don't see that they are truly believing in any of them... Only in a token way. In a way that they can say that they believe in them, but they don't.
Except to believe that all of them have been corrupted in one way or another. That Buddhism has lost its original teachings.... That the Umayyads rulers of Islam are the beast of the Book of Revelation.
Supposedly, all of them were true at one time, but then lost their way. Now, Baha'u'llah, has come to show us the way again.
Abdul Baha on Buddhism....
The founder of Buddhism was a wonderful soul. He established the Oneness of God, but later the original principles of His doctrines gradually disappeared, and ignorant customs and ceremonials arose and increased until they finally ended in the worship of statues and images . . . So it is with religions; through the passing of time they change from their original foundation, the truth of the Religion of God entirely departs, and the spirit of it does not stay; heresies appear, and it becomes a body without a soul. That is why it is renewed.
Abdul Baha on the Umayyads as the beast...
“The beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.” By this beast is meant the Umayyads, who assailed these witnesses from the pit of error. And indeed it came to pass that the Umayyads assailed the religion of Muḥammad and the truth of ‘Alí, which consist in the love of God.“The beast made war against these two witnesses.” By this is intended a spiritual war, meaning that the beast would act in complete opposition to the teachings, conduct, and character of these two witnesses, to such an extent that the virtues and perfections that had been diffused among the peoples and nations by virtue of their power would entirely vanish, and animal qualities and carnal desires would predominate. Therefore, this beast would wage war against them and would gain ascendancy, meaning that the darkness of the error propagated by this beast would prevail throughout the world and slay those two witnesses—that is, it would extinguish their spiritual life amidst the people, obliterate their divine laws and teachings, and trample underfoot the religion of God, leaving behind naught but a dead and soulless body.‘Abdu’l-Bahá, Some Answered Questions, Commentary on the Eleventh Chapter of the Revelation of John‘Abdu’l-Bahá, Some Answered Questions, Commentary on the Eleventh Chapter of the Revelation of John
Translated. Original Persianoceanoflights.org
I must say the approach taken wasn't the one needed. What is needed, no one can say, IMO.If only that were true.
Without trust in God, I would have no hope
This is a continuation of a thread I started three months ago. If you want to know why I would have no hope without trust in God you can read the OP of that thread: Without God there is no hope Please note that I was careful to change the title of this thread from Without God there is no hope...www.religiousforums.com
And Jesus said all his disciples could do as he did, and would do even greater things. Careful with putting handcuffs on God.That is the Quandary of Faith. We can open our hearts to God, yet in the process make ourselves God by our self induced understandings of that Word.
Consider if all Messengers are from God, our choice of excluding a majority for only One is highly erroneous. It is us making our own self an interpreter of the Word.
Regards Tony
Just the Gospel of Matthew and the letter of James opens up so very much understanding!It's not long and it's very tightly worded
Read the NT. You'll get it. Or not. I don't care. Too many words. You guys are all about words. But you don't want to listen or understand anyone else
Fear? They "fear" that what you are saying is wrong and taking people away from the truth.This is a debate/discussion forum CG, thus the responses received here are from others who fear what has been offered. Fear takes many faces, ridicule and stating there is an evil intent, is a great weapon of those that fear.
And that's exactly what a Born Again Christian would say. And how do people feel about them? As they are told they are all sinners and are all going to hell? Unless... the repent.The Message contains what you see as insults....yet....I see those same words as Love for all Faiths and for all humanity.
You thus call me out for having no predudices against religion or people's, but for embracing a Message that I see will ultimately unite all humanity, for that to happen, the Councels of the Most High, must be embraced.
You know it's not going to happen. There's so many things I've asked them that get ignored. Like where does it say in any prophecy in any religion that the end times Promised One is going to come, get rejected, exiled, thrown in prison and die without fixing things and establishing peace?Yeah, they sure have lots of reading to get through. It would take a lifetime. No wonder they don't have time to read much else. Except to spend hours on forums arguing and proselytizing.
I know how frustrating it can be. But your input has been amazing. It would be a great loss for me if you were to leave.I think I'm done on this thread
That is exactly what I offered, removing the handcuffs of names.And Jesus said all his disciples could do as he did, and would do even greater things. Careful with putting handcuffs on God.
Namaste
I do not know if we can. It appears to be more erroneous than helpful.How do you fix that? How do you build trust and friendship on a debate forum? And it's not like I'm trying to do it... except with some people. And with those people I do it by showing respect for them and their beliefs.
Or... it's making a person a believer in what their religion actually tells them to do.Consider if all Messengers are from God, our choice of excluding a majority for only One is highly erroneous. It is us making our own self an interpreter of the Word.
Perhaps I've misunderstood your intended view with your words as follows:That is exactly what I offered, removing the handcuffs of names.
Regards Tony