(...)
Secondly, we know that people are not born homosexual but rather it is an impact the society and environment has upon a person.
(...)
Let me ask you a counter-question.
If scientists find a gene for rape and prove to the world that there are some babies who are genetically born to become rapists. If those babies then grew up, became adults and then raped someone, would you then say that's fine, don't punish them since they had the genes anyway?
Although I do not take your story as a credible source of evidence since I have no information on your trustworthiness (no disrespect), I do think that such cases can exist.
I did not deny the possibility of such cases.
(...)
The lesson that is learnt from such a story is that although evil actions may not exist in a society, but it is still possible for someone to commit a new kind of evil action.
Having said that, I do believe that if that someone hangs around in a society then they are more likely to develop the culture of that society.
(...)
Islam cannot change it's stance against homosexuality. The Law of God remains unchanged since Only He is the True Legislator. Compare this to man-made law, such as Democracy.
I mean a person could be considered a criminal if he/she has sex with the same gender below the age of 18 in UK. However, that same person would not be regarded as criminal in other countries such as Germany, for example. So according to man-made law you wouldn't know who's right and who's wrong.
Oh boy. I am so sorry to see such words.
That, I think, shows very well why religion must always be questioned and kept separate from the powers of the State.
When a significant number of people decide to attribute infalibility and supreme significance to religious dogma, things cannot go any other way but awry.
You see, dogma, as you claim yourself,
cannot be changed, meaning among other things that it cannot be perfect or corrected. Apparently in opposition to you, I think that shows that human values and judgments are in fact definitely superior and more trustworthy than dogma-derived ones.
Why? Precisely because dogma is incapable of recognizing the subtleties and new challenges and circunstances of real life, while human society, for all its faults and shortcomings, at the very least attempts to.
I am very disturbed to see so many Muslims (and Christians) give more weight to scripture than to living people's discernment and motivation. That, in fact, is one of the main reasons why I know that Abraham's God is either non-existent or unworthy of consideration: one of the two explanations must be true to allow for the existence of theists that commit such an (sorry, but I must say it) obvious and terrible mistake. Surely a
real and worthy God would not allow such grotesque misuse of his teachings.