When you prevent an abortion...

[TagliatelliMonster]

"masturbation is the murder of millions of potential humans."

Wrong. Without an egg its just sperm.

And a blastocyst is just a lump of cells.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Of course I care . Innocent Living human beings should be allowed to live.

1. At the expense of another? So if a human requires a kidney and you are a match, we should be able to force you to give up a kidney? If you don't give your kidney, the human will die. Should we then charge you with murder?

2. a lump of cells is not a human.

 

[Revoltingest]

You've established that these are
bigger lumps than the initial lumps.

 

[KW]

You've established that these are
bigger lumps than the initial lumps.

So you can claim these aren’t human arms and fingers?

 

[Revoltingest]

So you can claim these aren’t human arms and fingers?

They look human to me...at least hominid.
But again, I'm not privy to their reasoning.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

So you can claim these aren’t human arms and fingers?

Where are those in this picture:

 

[KW]

Where are those in this picture:

So when would you forbid killing the unborn?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

So when would you forbid killing the unborn?

I wouldn't start with unborn. In general as totally free 12th week and before. Beyond that somewhere up to 22th week with a medical/social review. Over 22th week I rather not, but if done, then only in cases of the mother's health as per involving death.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

Oh really?

So you don't know what a blastocyst is, then.

 

[KW]

So when would you forbid killing the unborn?[/QUOTE

They haven’t grown yet, but they will if you don’t kill the child.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

...

Sort your post.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

So when would you forbid killing the unborn?

If we were to give a fetus all the rights of a person, there would be no point in pregnancy when abortion would be forbidden.

What you're asking for is more rights for a fetus than we give to an actual person.

 

[KW]

If we were to give a fetus all the rights of a person, there would be no point in pregnancy when abortion would be forbidden.

What you're asking for is more rights for a fetus than we give to an actual person.

All human beings have a right to life, even the inconvenient baby and leftists.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

All human beings have a right to life, even the inconvenient baby and leftists.

That is your belief system for rights. Not mine.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

All human beings have a right to life, even the inconvenient baby and leftists.

All human beings have a right to bodily autonomy, even the inconvenient pregnant person who you want to treat as worth less than a corpse.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

All human beings have a right to bodily autonomy, even the inconvenient pregnant person who you want to treat as worth less than a corpse.

Well, that depends on what you mean by "have".

 

[KW]

That is your belief system for rights. Not mine.

Yes. You believe in killing the inconvenient.

I hope you change your mind some time in the future.

 

[KW]

All human beings have a right to bodily autonomy, even the inconvenient pregnant person who you want to treat as worth less than a corpse.

A pregnant woman is not inconvenient.

What are you babbling about?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

A pregnant woman is not inconvenient.

What are you babbling about?

Being pregnant is extremely impactful.
A woman has a right to choose to not be pregnant.

Maybe you don't feel like women should be able to decide what happens to their own bodies?
It sure sounds like it.......

 

[KW]

Being pregnant is extremely impactful.
A woman has a right to choose to not be pregnant.

Maybe you don't feel like women should be able to decide what happens to their own bodies?
It sure sounds like it.......

A woman can decide before becoming pregnant. She doesn’t have a right to kill an innocent child. Children are not property.