PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
No. It is an understatement. However, other things you've said about God contradict it. For one thing, why on earth would God do any judging?Back to #126
'If' there is God...my list is not an assumption.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No. It is an understatement. However, other things you've said about God contradict it. For one thing, why on earth would God do any judging?Back to #126
'If' there is God...my list is not an assumption.
No. It is an understatement. However, other things you've said about God contradict it. For one thing, why on earth would God do any judging?
Why do you think Heaven is a single place? God has already constructed one Matrix, i.e. Heaven itself, why not make 6 billion?There are 6billion copies of this human form...each one generating a fresh soul.
If we all cross over...the chaos that Man creates for himself will 'bleed' into the peace of heaven.
Not all that we do here in this life will be allowed...later on.
Why do you think Heaven is a single place? God has already constructed one Matrix, i.e. Heaven itself, why not make 6 billion?
But the problem is more fundamental than that. It's actually quite simple: you don't judge automatons.
So your stance is that the first law of thermodynamics explains why god, one with likes and dislikes, human emotions and personality and intentions, and with the ability to communicate with us, and even had a son, doesn't have a creator?
So then it can be possible that god has a creator? If we're talking about possibilities...no, i'll repeat this again
the first law of thermodynamics provides us with an example of something that is eternal and cannot be destroyed. Having one example of a thing that eternal gives us the possibility that other things can be eternal too.
So can God be eternal? Yes, he possibly can.
All of the information available shows us that minds are simply automatons. It doesn't make sense to judge automatons, only debug them.A mindless copy?
Judgment might seem cold....unto someone having no reason.
But a mindless copy might not have enough of what it takes to stand up...
when the chemistry fails.
Really?Something can't arise from nothing.
Cripes, do you guys even read your own holy book?the incidences of God 'appearing' to various individuals in the old testament, was by means of his messengers....the angels.
no, i'll repeat this again
the first law of thermodynamics provides us with an example of something that is eternal and cannot be destroyed. Having one example of a thing that eternal gives us the possibility that other things can be eternal too.
So can God be eternal? Yes, he possibly can.
Cripes, do you guys even read your own holy book?
Exodus 33:11
And the Lord spake to Moses face to face, as a man speaketh to his friend.
The link I provided gave multiple passages of the Bible describing it's god being seen "face to face" by various people.
But either way, you've managed to dodge the points I made in post #118.
the hebrews had a way of speech far different to our own
You should talk to a hebrew speaking person and ask about the language. Its a very expressive language with vivid descriptions. its rich in metaphors and concrete words that involve the senses of seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting, and smelling so that the expressions can almost be felt by the hearer or reader.
In the case of Moses, his relationship with God was so impressive that it was as if he actually beheld God with his own eyes, All Gods prophets were given mental visions or dreams, which is an indirect form of communication, but not so with Moses. Moses could call on God at any time to request a judgement. God would hear him and immediately provide him with direction. No other prophet could summon God the way Moses could. This is why the language used is that Moses saw God 'face to face'... no other human (apart from Jesus) was able to so easily call for Gods attention.
LOL! Only in fundie-speak would "They spoke face to face" be interpreted as "They spoke via proxies".the hebrews had a way of speech far different to our own
You should talk to a hebrew speaking person and ask about the language. Its a very expressive language with vivid descriptions. its rich in metaphors and concrete words that involve the senses of seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting, and smelling so that the expressions can almost be felt by the hearer or reader.
In the case of Moses, his relationship with God was so impressive that it was as if he actually beheld God with his own eyes, All Gods prophets were given mental visions or dreams, which is an indirect form of communication, but not so with Moses. Moses could call on God at any time to request a judgement. God would hear him and immediately provide him with direction. No other prophet could summon God the way Moses could. This is why the language used is that Moses saw God 'face to face'... no other human (apart from Jesus) was able to so easily call for Gods attention.
No. An argument from authority would be if I said, "Stephen Hawking said gods are not needed to explain the universe, and he's an expert, therefore he's right". I simply asked why in your appeal to science you're ignoring one of the most prominent experts in cosmology?
Of course he is. Look at his qualifications. If he isn't an authority in cosmology, then no one is an authority in anything.
Why don't you ask him?
Is that not exactly what you want everyone to do?Nod your head for the sake of presumed know-how on someone else's part?
And I'm assuming that it says this in the bible, that Moses could call on God at will? And he was the only one able to do so?
Is that not exactly what you want everyone to do?
Just take your word for it?
Seems a bit hypocritical to me.