Aye, dumb cops didn't think of the potentialA fine example of where it is appropriate to attribute malicious intent.
repercussions of recording their discussions
of malicious intent.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Aye, dumb cops didn't think of the potentialA fine example of where it is appropriate to attribute malicious intent.
Indeed. Good cops are a rarity. Amd that's because good cops are mistreated amd abused to put it mildlyThese dumb cops had judgements against them
& their city for $8,250,000. Yet the cops were
supported by their department, & even promoted.
This shows how dumb cops pervade the entire
department, & that no good cops are there.
If cops are smart & honest, they can be driven from the force.Indeed. Good cops are a rarity. Amd that's because good cops are mistreated amd abused to put it mildly
You give up your rights in a car? What a douche.More example of dumb cops misunderstanding
the law, & abusing their authority....
Legally, cops are allowed to lie about crimes,You give up your rights in a car? What a douche.
Are you sure it's not an IQ of 80 and below?Legally, cops are allowed to lie about crimes,
laws, policies, & really anything. If they can
bully, trick, or coerce you to do something
unlawfully, they've the blessing of Democrats,
Republicans, SCOTUS, Congress, & several
posters on RF.
Cops even routinely lie to each other & on reports to justifyPolice empowered to lie about investigations after federal appeals court ruling
A federal appeals court recently decided that a St. Paul, Minnesota, cop was shielded from a lawsuit that alleged she fabricated a witness tampering charge because she was working on a federal task force at the time, in a decision that further expands the already granted to federal law enforcement.www.reuters.com
illegal acts. This is technically illegal, but tacitly permitted
99.9% of the time. To them, you're just a target. If they
claim "officer safety" they can kill you. If you're a hostage,
they can kill you. If you're just a bystander, they can kill you.
All they need is an IQ over 80 & a gun.
I'm guessing that very few cops under 80 get hired.Are you sure it's not 80 and below?
85-115 is the average IQ range (complete with standard deciation (+-15) in bith directions). Mild retardation starts at 70. This leaves an entire standard deviation where one isn't clinically retarded but definitely isn't very smart that I'm sure many, many cops fall within, especially if their average IQ (104) is on the mediocre side of average.I'm guessing that very few cops under 80 get hired.
Likely under 15%.
That cop who said you have no rights when a car
might be in the 70 range, ie, high functioning retarded.
We can only hope the future writes that off as fascist nonsense.Qualified immunity
Cel phones, youtube, & civil courts might do the job.We can only hope the future writes that off as fascist nonsense.
The Supreme Court must also chop it down.Cel phones, youtube, & civil courts might do the job.
And news media gotta address examples of police
brutality even when "black" isn't in the title.
The news media give the false impression of policeThe Supreme Court must also chop it down.
Amd most definitely the media needs to start having more coverage of police brutality against non-black people, and start covering whem it happens to, white men, natives, trans, women, mentally ill, amd everybody else.
Yeah, no. Those in such classes have been among those I've ran with. Many have been metalheads and juggalos and maggots (thems all **** the pigs types), strippers and drug dealers, nerds and weirdos. Cops though hasn't been a trend.They had to be taught
simpler material at a slower pace. They became cops.