Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well your thoughts may put that forth, but your body, your very own body that houses your mind, in contrast tells a very pointed and direct truth that cannot ever be changed. And that is you are indeed an evolved ape. As am I.
When you were a fetus still developing you went through some incredibly facinating stages. You developed gills briefly and sported a tail approx 4 weeks in development. Even though they were absorbed, your very genes loudly state your disposition as a member of the ape family. You definitely have a true tailbone inside you every moment and an appendix that deftly remains as solid evidence of your ancestral past.
A simple brief of those ancient genes you have right now. This very moment makes you a living testament of evolution and your heritage with the family of apes. You may deny of course, but you can never get rid of the truth that remains physically pervasive throughout your physical being that tells the real truth of the matter.
Embryos Show All Animals Share Ancient Genes : Discovery News : Discovery News
Dear Nowhere Man, Who said that Humans do NOT have the DNA and ERVS of the common ancestor of Apes? We do BUT it's explained HOW and WHEN this happened in Genesis 6:1-4. It happens when the sons of God (Prehistoric people) produced offspring with Humans. The children inherit the Human intelligence which ONLY God and Adam have, Gen 3:22 and they also inherit the DNA of the common ancestor of Apes. It cost Humans a loss of some 90% of our lifespans. Gen 6:3
Today's Humans were produced by Noah's grandsons and the prehistoric people (descendants of the sons of God) who were already here when Noah arrived some 10k years ago. Here is evidence of the Arrival of the Ark. Human civilization on this Planet can be traced to Noah and his descendants. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
First of all, you made most of that up.
Second of all, it says in Genesis 6:3 that no man will live to be older than 120 years old.
And there's two funny things about that.
1. People in later books of The Bible exceeded that age
2. People in the modern world have exceeded that age
Now, quit making stuff up and face the facts. You're wrong
Thanks!
He's making it up because he's a troll. I really wish people would understand that.
Oh look.
...frubals!
It follows from the misinterpretation of evolution as a linear process: an upward-sloping line, like the old, pre-scientific idea of a "Great Chain of Being". This is a simple way of viewing evolution and changes are easily visualized in a linear fashion the famous picture of human ancestors walking behind each other is a prime example. However, this traces just one twig of a much more complicated tree of life. If that could be said of monkeys, then it could be said of Africans, since all human beings are descended from Africans.
Buuuuuuuuuuut it doesn't work like that.
Because of all this:
- Evolution is the change in populations, not in individuals.
- Evolution is not a process in which species universally progress up a "ladder".
- Humans are not descended from any modern species of monkey; both monkeys and humans are descended from some long-extinct ancestor pre-dating both. Although this species, if it were transferred to today, would be considered a "monkey", it is not any living species of monkey.
- Evolution explains how humans developed from a primate ancestor, but not an extant species of monkey or ape. (Modern primates include: bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, baboons, macaques, lemurs, gibbons, and humans. None of these is a descendant of any other.)
- Speciation can occur by branching into two or more reproductively isolated populations (cladogenesis) or when a single population changes over time to such an extent that the later population is considered a different species (anagenesis).
I'm pretty sure the current scientific consensus is that Europeans are indeed descended from Africans.So by comparing it to monkeys and Humans means that the African human evolved to European human and that looks utter stupid.
I'm pretty sure the current scientific consensus is that Europeans are indeed descended from Africans.
I never said otherwise.Both are humans.
Both are humans.
Will these monkeys ever become human?
How about missing-link?
Have they found yet?
Why in the world would you think evolution says anything other than that?
But the Africans still humans similar to the Europeans.
So by comparing it to monkeys and Humans means that the African human evolved to European human and that looks utter stupid.
We can see African humans and Monkeys living in the same place.
Monkeys still monkeys and humans still humans.
My beautiful thread about science.
Actually makes me happy to see this happen to your thread
First of all, you made most of that up.
Second of all, it says in Genesis 6:3 that no man will live to be older than 120 years old.
And there's two funny things about that.
1. People in later books of The Bible exceeded that age
2. People in the modern world have exceeded that age
Now, quit making stuff up and face the facts. You're wrong
Thanks!
He's making it up because he's a troll. I really wish people would understand that.
Oh look.
...frubals!
Nope. Never.
What about them?
Yes many.
You dont know anything at all about anthopology ??