Tumah
Veteran Member
Funny.Isa 53.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Funny.Isa 53.
I would be interested to hear how someone whose birth was supposedly marked by a new star in the heavens and proclamations of angels, and whose baptism was supposedly praised by the voice of God himself satisfied this:<<
Isa 53 is a prophecy of the crucifixion and what it accomplished.
Isa 52:13---Jesus came as a bondservant(Phil 2:7)
Isa 53:5. Jesus was pierced and scourged. He suffered his to pay for our sins. That is basic Christian doctrine. 53:8: He was cut off from the living---Jesus died during His crucifixion.
The rest of it strikes me as a combination of unremarkable "predictions" that could be fulfilled by many people or small details that could be added to the story by any careful author who knew Isaiah.
Actually they couldn't be. The Levitical sacrifice had to have an animal without blemish. Only Jesus did not sin.
That. Or the more plausible explanation, the Gospel authors left out most of Jesus's life to provide that illusion.The Levitical sacrifice had to have an animal without blemish. Only Jesus did not sin.
I don’t claim to be all that good at math but shouldn’t there be a first coming before the second?Isa 53. It is doubtful you will accept that one or any one, so I am not going into any detail as to how he fulfilled it.
You need to do some study on the second coming of Christ.
That. Or the more plausible explanation, the Gospel authors left out most of Jesus's life to provide that illusion.
They did leave out the large majority of the Jesus story. That is a fact. Why they did is up for interpretation.
Tom
ETA ~ @omega2xx
I don’t claim to be all that good at math but shouldn’t there be a first coming before the second?
עִמָּנוּאֵלDo you really not understand the incarnation?
God is with us when we do the will of God. He will guide us, provide for us, protect us and save us from our enemies. This is the message from both the Gospels and Jewish scripture. They both use poetry to convey their message. The main difference between the two is the type of poetry being used.Do you really not understand the incarnation?
We're all Elohim (Psalms 82:6)...
Yet take into account Elohim is a plural, and are physically seen in human/angelic form in the Bible....
'Sons of the Gods' is 'Bene HaElohim', 'sons of the angels'.
ing James Bible
And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
King James Bible
They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
So the beings at the beginning of the Bible, makes more sense to me, if they''re viewed that these are representations of the divine in a form.
To me the ultimate God Most High (El Elyon) is without form, and doesn't ever appear in a physical state.
Yeshua challenged the Pharisees for murdering the prophets as atoning sacrifices in Matthew 23:27-38, Mark 7:1-13, and the Parable of the Wicked Husbandman (Matthew 21:33-46, Mark 12:1-12, and Luke 20:9-19).
Not sure why that was even a question, the text says it, so that is what is commonly accepted.
These differences exists, as Pharisees have lots of made up oral traditions, which the Sadducees didn't have.
Mine is based on first hand knowledge, and then systematically questioning all religions globally to see if it adds up.
It says Elohim (plural) made man in their image... God (singular) is beyond a form or a concept of a soul....We're like angels, nothing like God from my own first hand experience (NDE).God made man in 'our image'.
Yes clearly, was sent from Heaven to explain things, and people reject what I've been sent with, to follow their traditions passed down.Do you not see your own self reflected in the same way.
I'm completely open to being shown a better comprehension of the texts; yet so far based on what prophecy stated, most of it adds up clearly....Rejecting the truth for your own accepted version of what God is telling us?
Yes clearly so, it has to be him based on the criteria happening because of him, 2nd temple destruction, the Abomination of Desolation, the Diaspora, laying a Snare (Great Deception) across the world, and Israel/Judah divorced God because of their own choice for 30 pieces of silver, etc.So Christ did fit prophecies about the Messiah.
The same, use Esword Bible software to study, as can then check every word, and understand the prophets.Where as mine comes from God and his Word. King James Bible
Do you see Christian mobs as an occasional bear in the woods?We didn't have a thread like this in quite some time.
Funny how they always pop up when some Christian holiday draws near.
Well I guess its better than being raped and murdered by a Christian mob.
Why do you think the Jews rejected Jesus? The new testament seems to suggest the jews who rejected Jesus were just arrogant but i'm not sure I buy that.
Well I was reading "Why the jews rejected Jesus." So you know.We didn't have a thread like this in quite some time.
Funny how they always pop up when some Christian holiday draws near.
Well I guess its better than being raped and murdered by a Christian mob.
עִמָּנוּאֵל
God is with us when we do the will of God. He will guide us, provide for us, protect us and save us from our enemies. This is the message from both the Gospels and Jewish scripture. They both use poetry to convey their message. The main difference between the two is the type of poetry being used.
Ok, nothing in the Bible is poetry. All of it should be taken literal. Jesus was born of a virgin. He raised people from the dead, walked on water, turned water into wine and he himself rose from the dead. How do you explain no one wrote about any of this during his life time?Nothing you said is about the incarnation and it certainly isn't poetry.
Ok, nothing in the Bible is poetry. All of it should be taken literal. Jesus was born of a virgin. He raised people from the dead, walked on water, turned water into wine and he himself rose from the dead. How do you explain no one wrote about any of this during his life time?
View attachment 16691
Or any of the other events in the Gospels.How do you explain no one wrote about any of this during his life time?
Ok, nothing in the Bible is poetry. All of it should be taken literal. Jesus was born of a virgin. He raised people from the dead, walked on water, turned water into wine and he himself rose from the dead. How do you explain no one wrote about any of this during his life time?
At least learn to quote correctly. I did not say there was no poetry in the Bible and I certainly did not say it is all literal. What makes you think when something is written determines if it is true. That is a silly argument.
Erhman is an ultra liberal theologian who makes outlandish statements about Jesus and the Bible but NEVER provides any evidence for what he says. He wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit him on his butt.
Josephus and a Roman historian, Ticitus(sp) both mention Jesus. So Erhman is wrong about even a simple thing like that. If you want to put your faith in Erhman, good luck, you will need it.