Why does homosexuality seem to get more hate?

[waitasec]

alrighty then
moving right along...

 

[methylatedghosts]

What does that have to do with a man and a woman with clean histories?

Just saying that you could, theoretically, have sex with only one person who has had sex with no-one else, and still get an STD. That's what it's got to do with it.

Anyway, that's gone completely off topic, STDs have just as much to do with heterosexuality as homosexuality, and neither is at any more risk than the other, with proper precautions such as the use of condoms.

I'm not really enjoying how you seem to be trying to divert the conversation away from the ACTUAL issues, picking out single sentences or even part-sentences and responding to that, rather than in terms of the post as a whole. There are a fair few good quality posts that you seem to have somehow either missed or ignored completely :ignore: like a child with her fingers in her ears yelling "Na na na na, I can't hear you". I feel that this is being intellectually dishonest and because of this, I don't feel like you are actually taking in any of what's being said, that you're only here to preach what you believe without listening to anyone else. And I'm sure I'm not the only person here that feels this way.

If you actually want to have a decent discussion and debate, you need to clear this up, you need to go back and at least read through the information you've been given so that you can formulate a good-quality argument against it.

 

[T-Dawg]

Oops, ya got me; well done! :clap:clap:clap

Oh, btw, giggles... Where, exactly, did I say that?

In the passage I quoted. The person you were quoting said that STDs could also come from heterosexual encounters (as a response to stating STDs as a reason for being against homosexuality), and you said that it was the stupidest claim you had ever heard.

 

[blackout]

I already know how STDs can be prevented, and abstinence before marriage is the most effective. People like you need to stop pointing your fingers at the moral & responsible people.

Just for the sake of your own "argument" here,
homosexuals can also abstain before marriage/committment,
to the EXACT same end as heterosexuals.

 

[blackout]

Heterosexuals should always abstain from sexual intercourse
because they might concieve a homosexual
thus bringing more sin into the world.

It is the holy/saintly/selfless thing
to abstain
in order to prevent sin in another.

 

[Tristesse]

why must we talk about the obvious...

Because for some, the obvious isn't so obvious.

 

[Tristesse]

Adonis, I suggest you start being honest and admit that the only reason you have to think homosexuality is wrong, is because the bible says we should be killing them.

 

[waitasec]

Because for some, the obvious isn't so obvious.

now that is crystal clear.

 

[Adonis65]

Anyway, that's gone completely off topic, STDs have just as much to do with heterosexuality as homosexuality

This is what's off topic. I've said nothing of heterosexuality, and yet, you lefties leap at the opportunity to slap this card down with nary a thought beforehand. :yes:

The point is, nothing good ever comes from homosexual behavior. It's all bad -- all of it. The same cannot be said of heterosexual behavior.

 

[Adonis65]

In the passage I quoted. The person you were quoting said that STDs could also come from heterosexual encounters (as a response to stating STDs as a reason for being against homosexuality), and you said that it was the stupidest claim you had ever heard.

Uh-uh. I said that was the stupidest claim because it's only obvious that heterosexuals can also spread STD's. But we're not talking about heterosxuals, are we. The title heading for this thread is about homosexuals. See, someone has to keep you radicals honest, or you'll just take your nonsensical crap & run roughshod all over these forums.

 

[Adonis65]

Adonis, I suggest you start being honest and admit that the only reason you have to think homosexuality is wrong, is because the bible says we should be killing them.

I think you should repent and read the Bible with a prayerful heart. :help:

The Lord can be patient only for so long.

 

[Adonis65]

Just for the sake of your own "argument" here,
homosexuals can also abstain before marriage/committment,
to the EXACT same end as heterosexuals.

Even if a gay couple has, which I doubt, that still doesn't resolve the sin problem. See, homosexuals were never meant to be married. It takes a society with compromised morals to put up with such a burden.

 

[otokage007]

This is what's off topic. I've said nothing of heterosexuality, and yet, you lefties leap at the opportunity to slap this card down with nary a thought beforehand. :yes:

The point is, nothing good ever comes from homosexual behavior. It's all bad -- all of it. The same cannot be said of heterosexual behavior.

Lol you should be imprisioned for what you have said.

Homosexuality has nothing bad, the only thing that differs from heterosexuality is that with homosexuality you just get AIDS, with heterosexuality you just get AIDS AND PREGNANT.

 

[T-Dawg]

Uh-uh. I said that was the stupidest claim because it's only obvious that heterosexuals can also spread STD's. But we're not talking about heterosxuals, are we. The title heading for this thread is about homosexuals. See, someone has to keep you radicals honest, or you'll just take your nonsensical crap & run roughshod all over these forums.

Us radicals? You're the one who wants to outlaw homosexuality and advocates worshiping a murderous tyrant (check God's death count and read up on his laws sometime )...

 

[Yeshe Dawa]

The point is, nothing good ever comes from homosexual behavior. It's all bad -- all of it. The same cannot be said of heterosexual behavior.

Hi Adonis65!

I don't quite know what you mean when you say that nothing good ever comes from homosexual behavior. Could you possibly explain what comes out of a heterosexual relationship (other than children, of course) that doesn't arise out of a homosexual relationship, or vice versa (if you prefer)?

Peace and blessings,
Yeshe
:flower2:

 

[methylatedghosts]

Just saying that you could, theoretically, have sex with only one person who has had sex with no-one else, and still get an STD. That's what it's got to do with it.

Anyway, that's gone completely off topic, STDs have just as much to do with heterosexuality as homosexuality, and neither is at any more risk than the other, with proper precautions such as the use of condoms.

I'm not really enjoying how you seem to be trying to divert the conversation away from the ACTUAL issues, picking out single sentences or even part-sentences and responding to that, rather than in terms of the post as a whole. There are a fair few good quality posts that you seem to have somehow either missed or ignored completely :ignore: like a child with her fingers in her ears yelling "Na na na na, I can't hear you". I feel that this is being intellectually dishonest and because of this, I don't feel like you are actually taking in any of what's being said, that you're only here to preach what you believe without listening to anyone else. And I'm sure I'm not the only person here that feels this way.

If you actually want to have a decent discussion and debate, you need to clear this up, you need to go back and at least read through the information you've been given so that you can formulate a good-quality argument against it.

Anyway, that's gone completely off topic, STDs have just as much to do with heterosexuality as homosexuality

This is what's off topic. I've said nothing of heterosexuality, and yet, you lefties leap at the opportunity to slap this card down with nary a thought beforehand. :yes:

The point is, nothing good ever comes from homosexual behavior. It's all bad -- all of it. The same cannot be said of heterosexual behavior.

As I was saying...

 

[Adonis65]

Lol you should be imprisioned for what you have said.

I'm sorry; did I offend your pc sensitive ears? :sad4:

Homosexuality has nothing bad,

Aaaaand

..with homosexuality you just get AIDS,

Oops! Apparently homosexuality does have something bad.

Pregnancy is a good thing, oto; unless, of course, you can't support your brood. Perhaps you baby killing hysterics should turn off your computers and teach the third world how to manage their sex lives. Convert that murderous spirit into something positive for a change.

 

[Adonis65]

As I was saying...

You're wrong, methyl.

 

[Adonis65]

You're the one who wants to outlaw homosexuality...

Slow down there, T-Dawg. I said no such thing. I just want to defend the sanctity of marriage....that's it.

 

[T-Dawg]

I'm sorry; did I offend your pc sensitive ears? :sad4:

It has more to do with your views being a threat to civilized society.

Aaaaand



Oops! Apparently homosexuality does have something bad.

Way to misquote, just like a true right-winger. The point was that BOTH HETEROSEXUAL AND HOMOSEXUAL SEX CAN RESULT IN THE TRANSMISSION OF AIDS. THEREFORE, AIDS IS NOT AN ARGUMENT AGAINST HOMOSEXUAL SEX ANY MORE THAN IT WOULD BE AGAINST HETEROSEXUAL SEX.

Pregnancy is a good thing, oto; unless, of course, you can't support your brood. Perhaps you baby killing hysterics should turn off your computers and teach the third world how to manage their sex lives. Convert that murderous spirit into something positive for a change.

Pregnancy is not in itself either a good thing or a bad thing. Many people do not want babies; many do. It is a fact that the earth cannot sustain as many humans as it has now, let alone even MORE humans - procreation should therefore be moderated, by force if necessary.
"Baby killing hysterics"? Who here has advocated killing babies? Are you perhaps equating support for gay marriage with a pro-choice position for abortion, an entirely separate issue? At any rate, none of us advocate killing babies, although many of us do maintain that a woman has the right to abort her fetuses, if that's what you mean. But what do you mean by "convert that murderous spirit into something useful"? Are you suggesting that we murder third world babies?!?
(Also, it would be easier to teach the third world how to manage their sex lives if you Christians [in particular, the Pope] didn't go around telling them that condoms caused AIDS, and other such nonsense.)