dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Sure Arabs did attack Israel, but the conflict started before that correct?
The conflict began prior ro WW1 with the Young Turk revolt of the Ottoman empire.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sure Arabs did attack Israel, but the conflict started before that correct?
Unfounded assumption.
The Jews did not start the war , the Arabs did.
Not true. It's history. The enemies of israel have shown time after time. The anti-israel propagandists have successfully wiped their prior acts from your memory, assuming you ever knew the history of the conflict in the first place.
Hamas has promised to repeat the OCt 7th attack.
What you're proposing is a free-pass for palestinians to continue to send their rockets, their kidnappers, their murders, and their rapists into israel as long as they have a school, or a mosque, or a hospital to hide in.
Bad policy. You're favoring the rape, murdering, and kidnapping in order to protect schools, and hospitals.
No, what I am proposing is that Israel could have used it's resources to strenghten it's borders and performed surgical operations to kill the ones responsible for what happened in October 7th, rather than going on a rampage to massacre the palestinians.
So, what could Israel do to stop the rockets being fired by Hamas into Israel, such as the 160 launched in the last day?
Also, if Hamas continues to not release hostages, what should Israel do?
How many killed?
Negotiate.
Likely 0, but that's not the point. If I fire rockets at your house but they all missed, are you just going to ignore that minus any response?
There have been and still are.
I don't have to feel it , i have already expirienced all of that.I witnessed war , there is nothing that i would add.I know exactly that same scenario and what can happen.Question: How do you feel about land, that has been settled for multiple generations, being owned and then carved up and given away - not by the people who have lived there for multiple generations, but by people who not only don't live there, but lived thousands of miles away and maintain power through imperialism?
A big fan, I take it?
I did not say that it was okThen please explain why it's perfectly okay to kill thirty-thousands plus Palestinians in response to Hamas.
You don't dictate here what is relevant and what is irrelevant.The rest of your pablum is irrelevant until you answer that.
That's an awfully long way of not even coming close to addressing what I wrote.I don't have to feel it , i have already expirienced all of that.I witnessed war , there is nothing that i would add.I know exactly that same scenario and what can happen.
What is evident in the last period is how people abuse the suffering of the Gazans for their own agenda.Israel should answer for the damage.But the state of Israel will answer , not the whole nation.Hamas must answer for the terrorist attack also.That's an act of war and that alone is the start of this conflict.
The Muslim world celebrated the attack world wide , i have seen that with my own eyes.Here on this forum i have seen opinions in the form of 'it was about time , this is for everything Israel did'.
No one wishes war , war is death and nothing more.
How many generations will inherit this hate and what will happen in the future?Yeah , probably nobody thinks of these things at the moment.
These people need a system and a small state to begin another life.That is very obvious.
But in order to even consider that possibility Hamas needs to be broken in pieces.
The war won't be over untill that happens , Israel will hunt Hamas to the Moon if it must.
Someone else lived there before them , what should we say about the Islamic conquest?
Do you know how many migrated because of that? Probably not...
If Israel loses this war , prepare to participate in a nasty contlict in the world.
You understimate the position of these sects.They don't care about your humanity, in their head you are just a tool to a higher purpose.They have resources and are ready to fight on the big scene.They are using Gazans as shields and they are the ones who can end this suffering.They have expirienced anihilation , every decision except surrender is a waste of Gazan life.
The mistake of Israel is not considering a possibility of tactical mission with special ops.They can ask for help and it can be done with many countries participating in that scenario.Israel had many possibilities to solve this , but they went solo and they will answer solo.Everyone who participated in this run should answer for the way they approached this conflict.
I suffer when i see pictures from Gaza.
But it seems that these days it is more important to condemn Israel..
Okay. So would you like to address the fact that Israel has killed over thirty-thousand Palestinians and committed multiple war crimes, and how you feel about that?I did not say that it was ok
I disagree.You don't dictate here what is relevant and what is irrelevant.
Uh huh. If you say so.You are not even qualified to talk about these kind of issues and yet you have the courage to say what is and what is not relevant
It seems that is the only answer that is relevant when the death of all these people is mentioned.Still have yet to see an argument successfully justifying the deaths of thirty-thousands plus civilians. I see a lot of obfuscation, though.
I did not say that they are not war crimes , you fail again on understanding my view.Generally speaking, when people try to change the focus from "This state is currently engaged in war crimes" to "But religion, though, what with the Islam and such" it's rarely anything more than a feeble attempt to distract from the war crimes.
You seek justification and you seek argument as justification , that tells enough.As if the beliefs of those civilians who are the victims of war crimes is in any way relevant to whether or not those war crimes were or are reasonably justified.
And yet, people seem to find a way regardless. You're quick to point out the threat "the Muslim world" presents, but not so quick on the uptake when it comes to addressing objective war crimes against civilian populations of Muslims.It seems that is the only answer that is relevant when the death of all these people is mentioned.
To seek an argument as justification in this kind of issues is madness.
I did not say that you said they weren't war crimes, so this statement is incredibly ironic. I said you were trying to switch focus AWAY from that topic. Which you are.I did not say that they are not war crimes , you fail again on understanding my view.
Nope. I accept both carry blame. The problem is when people try to distract from one side of the blame by trying to talk about something other than explicit incidences of war crimes and who is perpetrating them.You seek justification and you seek argument as justification , that tells enough.
Hamas is guilty for the suffering of all Gaza same as Israel is guilty for the suffering of all Gaza.
But you can't accept that , i suppose?
Yes , they need to answer in every possible way.The state , not the whole nation.Okay. So would you like to address the fact that Israel has killed over thirty-thousand Palestinians and committed multiple war crimes, and how you feel about that?
Don't have a problem if you agree or disagree.I disagree.
You haven't proved otherwise in the discussion.Uh huh. If you say so.
How do you know that?And yet, people seem to find a way regardless. You're quick to point out the threat "the Muslim world" presents, but not so quick on the uptake when it comes to addressing objective war crimes against civilian populations of Muslims.
Hard to find it , based on your answers.I did not say that you said they weren't war crimes, so this statement is incredibly ironic.
Nono , i am adressing what is lately the hype over this conflict.The finger on Israel alone.I said you were trying to switch focus AWAY from that topic. Which you are.
So we 're good.Nope. I accept both carry blame.
Nono , your questions were answered.The problem is when people try to distract from one side of the blame by trying to talk about something other than explicit incidences of war crimes and who is perpetrating them.
I am ok with your view since both should carry the blame.So much for "not understanding views". Seems the lack of comprehension is yours.
Not enough?So, what could Israel do to stop the rockets being fired by Hamas into Israel, such as the 160 launched in the last day?
How many killed?
Not enough?
thousands and thousands of civilian corpses
No, what I am proposing is that Israel could have ...