• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Dont Christians Accept the Book of Mormon as Valid?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
The BoM has brought and continues to bring people to CHRIST.

Perhaps, but many also seem to leave that church as soon as they begin to grow in the spirit. GOD certainly as the power to turn evil around to good for those that really love the LORD and not just simply motivated by the fellowship...
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
To think a prophet would run for President and not see the fact that he would lose...

that's right - to think running for President wouldn't give him or his teachings any exposure to the public at large. No benefit in running at all.:rolleyes:

Also, a prophet isn't a fortune-teller - he's a messenger from God and holds the same authority Christ gave Peter.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Perhaps, but many also seem to leave that church as soon as they begin to grow in the spirit. GOD certainly as the power to turn evil around to good for those that really love the LORD and not just simply motivated by the fellowship...

Do you have any proof that "many also seem to leave that church as soon as they begin to grow in the spirit?" I'd argue it's the other way around. Many Christians join the Mormon Church. Then, those Christian churches attack the Mormon church because of their fear of losing their members (who pay their salary).
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I'd like to point out you're shifting arguments again. Every time you're rebutted, you switch to a new argument. Most recently, you implied the BoM doesn't bring people to Christ. Once I clarified that it does, you then switch to "well, people leave your church when they grow spiritually."

What's next?

I enjoy this stream of consciousness approach.
 

Christian Pilgrim

Active Member
I'd like to point out you're shifting arguments again. Every time you're rebutted, you switch to a new argument. Most recently, you implied the BoM doesn't bring people to Christ. Once I clarified that it does, you then switch to "well, people leave your church when they grow spiritually."

What's next?

I enjoy this stream of consciousness approach.

It seems you guys are ganging up on Brother "LittleNipper". He probably doesn't need my help. However, I have a simple question for all the LDS Christians participating on this thread.

Do we find a different Jesus and a different gospel by using the Holy Bible alone as our source of revelation, as compared to using the Bible and the three additional Moromon books of revelation? My answer is yes, because if we use the Holy Bible alone as the only divine source from above, you will not be able to find the Mormon gospel or the Mormon Jesus through the Bible alone. And that is the central reason why Christians reject the Book of Mormon as being from Almighty God. Christians for the last 2,000 years have loved and worshiped the Triune God revealed in the Bible because He is the One True Sovereign God worthy of our affection, adoration, loyalty and alliance.
 
Last edited:

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
JESUS didn't practice any religion. JESUS filled a relationship between GOD and man. Mormonism doen't bridge a gap, it creates a new set of rules and works for people to "feel" warm and good about themselves.
:biglaugh:
Jesus was a practicing Jew.

The gap that Mormonism bridges is the gap between witness and revelation, since their claim is that reliable witness hasn't existed for some time now -- revelation has taken its place.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
It seems you guys are ganging up on Brother "LittleNipper". He probably doesn't need my help. However, I have a simple question for all the LDS Christians participating on this thread.

Do we find a different Jesus and a different gospel by using the Holy Bible alone as our source of revelation, as compared to using the Bible and the three additional Moromon books of revelation? My answer is yes, because if we use the Holy Bible alone as the only divine source from above, you will not be able to find the Mormon gospel or the Mormon Jesus through the Bible alone. And that is the central reason why Christians reject the Book of Mormon as being from Almighty God. Christians for the last 2,000 years have loved and worshiped the Triune God revealed in the Bible because He is the One True Sovereign God worthy of our affection, adoration, loyalty and alliance.
We don't find the purely Biblical Jesus in many of our orthodox (little "o") churches, but a Jesus that is the product of the tradition. The same is true of Mormonism. If you think that the Bible is the only source of Jesus awareness, you're wearing blinders.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
It seems you guys are ganging up on Brother "LittleNipper". He probably doesn't need my help. However, I have a simple question for all the LDS Christians participating on this thread.

Do we find a different Jesus and a different gospel by using the Holy Bible alone as our source of revelation, as compared to using the Bible and the three additional Moromon books of revelation? My answer is yes, because if we use the Holy Bible alone as the only divine source from above, you will not be able to find the Mormon gospel or the Mormon Jesus through the Bible alone. And that is the central reason why Christians reject the Book of Mormon as being from Almighty God. Christians for the last 2,000 years have loved and worshiped the Triune God revealed in the Bible because He is the One True Sovereign God worthy of our affection, adoration, loyalty and alliance.

I'm just answering LN's questions.

The Jesus in the BoM is the exact same Jesus as found in the Bible. Have you even read the BoM? Can you give me an example of how you think they're different?
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
I'm just answering LN's questions.

The Jesus in the BoM is the exact same Jesus as found in the Bible. Have you even read the BoM? Can you give me an example of how you think they're different?
Mormonism does present Jesus differently from orthodox Xy.
 

Christian Pilgrim

Active Member
I'm just answering LN's questions.

The Jesus in the BoM is the exact same Jesus as found in the Bible. Have you even read the BoM? Can you give me an example of how you think they're different?

Your'e entitled to your own opinion my friend. Sure, I read and owned several books of Mormon Revelation including the BOM. If you think the Jesus found in the Bible alone is the same as the Jesus of the BOM, let's start a thread on that very topic, okay?
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Your'e entitled to your own opinion my friend. Sure, I read and owned several books of Mormon Revelation including the BOM. If you think the Jesus found in the Bible alone is the same as the Jesus of the BOM, let's start a thread on that very topic, okay?

I think this thread is just fine for such a discussion. Afterall, it's about why Christians don't accept the BoM. One possible reason may be that Christians find a different Jesus in the BoM. I'd like to know how the BoM Jesus is different. Can you answer that? You made the claim.
 

Christian Pilgrim

Active Member
I think this thread is just fine for such a discussion. Afterall, it's about why Christians don't accept the BoM. One possible reason may be that Christians find a different Jesus in the BoM. I'd like to know how the BoM Jesus is different. Can you answer that? You made the claim.

Well, we can discuss the gospel together with the person and work of Jesus Christ as the central issue. We can also discuss the Triune God. But to make this work, let's stick to only the Bible as a source of revelation. We can first determine official Mormon doctrine and see if you can support that doctrine from the Bible. Does that sound like a plan to you?
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Then you can tell me how Jesus in the BoM is different than Jesus in the Bible. Because that was their claim.
I'd be willing to bet that the BOM Jesus is different that the Jesus that is proclaimed by the church, just as the Biblical Jesus is different from the Jesus that is proclaimed by the Church.

Y'all have the double problem, not only of reconciling the Biblical Jesus with the BOM Jesus, but also of reconciling that scriptural Jesus with the Jesus of your tradition.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Well, we can discuss the gospel together with the person and work of Jesus Christ as the central issue. We can also discuss the Triune God. But to make this work, let's stick to only the Bible as a source of revelation. We can first determine official Mormon doctrine and see if you can support that doctrine from the Bible. Does that sound like a plan to you?

You're changing the argument. The claim was that the Bible Jesus and the BoM Jesus are different. I think we need to look at those two exclusively and see what we come up with.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I'd be willing to bet that the BOM Jesus is different that the Jesus that is proclaimed by the church, just as the Biblical Jesus is different from the Jesus that is proclaimed by the Church.

Y'all have the double problem, not only of reconciling the Biblical Jesus with the BOM Jesus, but also of reconciling that scriptural Jesus with the Jesus of your tradition.

I think that's a better argument because I'm certain the Biblical Jesus and the BoM Jesus are identical. I think the LDS challenge arises when that scriptural Jesus is compared to our common teachings.

But - as you've pointed out - we rely on continuing revelation to fill in the gaps.
 

Christian Pilgrim

Active Member
You're changing the argument. The claim was that the Bible Jesus and the BoM Jesus are different. I think we need to look at those two exclusively and see what we come up with.

Sure, let's discuss this in any way that you want. Are you sure that a new thread is not the answer?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top