• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

why is being gay forbidden ?

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
Good luck with that "movement". I don't think it has a sliver of a chance.

You're sounding pretty ignorant now. There's many parishes who offer the Tridentine Mass and it's growing in popularity.
The Rise of Latin Mass Youth - Crisis Magazine
Ordinations signal growing popularity of Latin Catholic Mass : Lifestyles

And, I couldn't disagree more about the priest, but that is based on my personal experience. Further, Latin is a dead language, so, unless you don't want parishioners to understand the sermon, then Latin is not a good idea.
Latin is the language of the Church. The homily in the Tridentine Mass is in the vernacular. As for the rest of it, there are missals for that.

If you think that keeping members of the church and bringing in "fresh blood" to the pews is important, you should not be pushing for this "movement". It will cause many more to leave, imho. Modernization is the only way to bring back people to the Church, which I think should be the number 1 priority.
The people started leaving after Vatican II. Liberal Christianity is collapsing across the board. Tradition is the way to growth and vibrancy. Modernism is the way to decay and death. People go to Mass to experience the numinous and the timeless, not to visit a social club. Why do you think beautiful, ornate Gothic and Byzantine churches inspire awe? Here's a hint: They're not the product of the modern world.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Yeah, no. The Mass shouldn't have been changed and there's a movement in the Church to bring it back. All they did was make it more like a Protestant service. The priest should be facing the Lord along with the rest of the congregation, not the people. It's not about the priests, so they shouldn't be the center of attention. Altar rails need to be brought back and people should be taking Communion on their knees and on their tongue, because it's God Himself and we should express all due reverence. It's also good to have a universal liturgical language. Latin should be revived and learning it needs to be encouraged among the clergy, religious and laity. We need a revival of tradition, not more selling ourselves out to modernity.

Go right ahead with that in your own life. It is definitely not for me. 20+ years away from this kind of mindset, and I much prefer the peace of mind now.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Well, it is a largely youth-driven movement. We are the future. :D
Honestly, I think there should be another Chism in Catholicism. I am very against going back on any of the progress made during Vatican II, and I also feel strongly that we need another "meeting of the minds" to progress the Church into the future. But, you are also a Catholic with just as much say in the matter as I do.

So, maybe we need to split. If they changed the mass to Latin, I would surely choose another denomination because I feel that understanding the sermon is #1. I wouldn't want to bring my kids to a mass that they didn't understand either, as they would just be bored and get nothing out of it. But, maybe you feel differently.

What do you think about this possibility?
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
What percentage of Catholics in the US would you say prefer a Latin mass? Are you arguing that it is the majority?
No, it's not the majority but it is a growing: Catholic Answers Forums - View Single Post - Statistics on Latin Mass?

Also, there's millions of Eastern Rite Catholics who celebrate using various ancient rites that are not in the vernacular, same as the hundreds of millions of Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Christians around the world. So it's the Novus Ordo that really is the incongruity here.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Well, it is a largely youth-driven movement. We are the future. :D

Given your vision to go back? How ironic. :p

I say if it makes you happy, go for it. Myself, when I adopted such a mindset, made me chronically depressed, suicidal, and much less empathetic of others. If given the choice to return to it or stick my hand in a blender, I'd choose the latter.

So no thanks.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
No, it's not the majority but it is a growing: Catholic Answers Forums - View Single Post - Statistics on Latin Mass?

Also, there's millions of Eastern Rite Catholics who celebrate using various ancient rites that are not in the vernacular, same as the hundreds of millions of Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Christians around the world. So it's the Novus Ordo that really is the incongruity here.
What?! I just found out that there are roughly 17,500 Sunday masses held in the US every week. Roughly 400 of them are held in Latin. So, you are saying that when roughly 2% of Sunday Masses are held in Latin, that is "many parishes offering the Trandestine Mass". To me, that is merely a fringe of the Catholic adherents who prefer to be old-fashioned. Since 2000 it's gone from 1.3% to 2%. Less than a percentage point in 15 years is not a "growing movement" by any means.

This is a pipe-dream. Thank God.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
I stopped reading there. I just can't take you seriously.
"You're sounding pretty ignorant now. There's many parishes who offer the Tridentine Mass and it's growing in popularity."

From 1.3% to 2% in 15 years ... When I read that, I should have stopped listening to you. I knew I was right, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Big mistake on my part, as your statement was extremely misleading.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
What does the format for catholic mass have to do with gay being forbidden?
We were on a tangent about Vatican II, which he mentioned because of Catholic Feminism (which, came about largely during that time). I said that Vatican II was one of the best things to happen to the Church, one reason being the change from Latin mass to English. He disagreed. Then he made some erroneous comments about the Latin mass "gaining popularity" in the States. Problem is that after checking the Vatican website, only about 2% of Sunday masses are done in Latin. That is up from 1.3% 15 years ago. Not really a "growing movement" by any means.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Because it's off-topic and I don't see the point in discussing it with you. Are you even Catholic? If not, why do you care which rite of the Mass is used?
I grew up Catholic (catholic grade-school & all-boys Jesuit high school), and I am starting to get back into joining my parish, as Pope Francis has turned me around a bit. I think what he is doing at the Vatican is great. There is much more that needs to be done, but at least it appears that he is trying. But, if the Church started to back-step, I would move on completely and never look back. That is why it is important to me.

Jesus is my focus, not the man-made, imperfect Church.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I grew up Catholic (catholic grade-school & all-boys Jesuit high school), and I am starting to get back into joining my parish, as Pope Francis has turned me around a bit. I think what he is doing at the Vatican is great. There is much more that needs to be done, but at least it appears that he is trying. But, if the Church started to back-step, I would move on completely and never look back. That is why it is important to me.

Jesus is my focus, not the man-made, imperfect Church.
Well, you know that Francis isn't a liberal, right? He's working on changing the tone of the Church, but that doesn't mean doctrine is going to be trashed.
 
Top