And not even you agree that parents can teach whatever they like to their kids. That's what I don't get about this whole thing.
So far as I know, I haven't expressed an opinion one way or the other about what parents should or shouldn't teach their children. No one has asked me.
I'm pretty sure we can all agree that there are certain things parents shouldn't teach their kids.
Sure, but it's all personal opinion. I don't think parents should teach their kids to love money and to focus on some kind of career. To me, that's soul-killing. I want my kids to be poet-philosophers. But I recognize it as just my personal opinion.
The question is where to draw the line. For instance, I hope we all agree that parents shouldn't teach their kids that they can fly when they jump off buildings or that modern medicine in any form is evil and shouldn't be used.
Everyone in this thread might agree, but every parent certainly doesn't agree.
So the question becomes why. Why should parents not teach those things?
Because we hold a personal opinion that it's harmful to the kids. But the family unit is still pretty sacred. Do you want me to prevent you from teaching your kids various things that you want to teach them -- if I can demonstrate that your teachings might be harmful?
If we really should be fine with parents teaching whatever they believe to be fact, it allows for so many possibilities that we agree aren't good. So, the parent can't be the final arbiter of what's fact and what's not. There has to be some standard to compare to. All I'm saying is we use that standard to teach kids facts and beliefs.
Who's in charge of governing the standard? You? Or Pat Robertson?
What will you say when I try to prevent you from teaching your kids things which logic and reason tell me should not be taught?