moegypt
Active Member
I was not recommending genocide.
Ok now it is clear
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was not recommending genocide.
Look kai, no one here likes the Taliban. But most Afghans want some kind of peaceful settlement with the Afghan Taliban. Why? Because the Taliban are Afghans. Because in many cases the local population subscribe to the Taliban ideology, as well as ancient, conservative tribal customs. If a few Taliban were holding freedom-loving Afghans hostage in every case, then they could be liberated but you can't liberate people from something they support. But the fact is that in a lot of rural areas the central Afghan government does nothing, local leaders fill the vacuum and provide some counterbalance to lawlessness, and we call them 'Taliban'. In some cases I would think some rural Afghans would rather be ruled by the Taliban than have warlords and lawlessness. We should go after Al Qaeda and support equitable government in Afghanistan, but there is no reason we MUST have a violent conflict with rural tribes that have a very conservative religious culture. Saudi Arabia has an extremely fundamentalist Islamic culture and government, most Saudis either support it or at least aren't violently against it, yet Saudi Arabia is an ally and we try (or should try) to encourage democratic reform and human rights, and capture terrorists who attacked us through PEACEFUL agreements with the Saudis. Are peaceful agreements with ALL the Afghan Taliban not possible?you mean leave them to it! The only atmosphere suitable to Taliban is a Taliban one.
On the other hand, Tashan, would you agree that in many ways Al Qaeda and the sectarian extremists are worse? After all they deliberately bomb unarmed civilians standing in line to vote, on purpose to prevent the democratic process; they carry out ethnic cleansing, bomb the holy Shiite shrine to incite civil war, etc. on purpose. Imagine what they would do with a big military and weapons to match the U.S.
In other words, do you agree there is a difference between an American soldier and a member of a Shiite death squad (for example)? One is trying to establish maintain peace and some democracy, and failing (albeit, to secure business interests, whether he realizes it or not). The other is/was succeeding in their goal killing innocent people and driving out Sunnis from their homes.
Oh, how noble!! Poor guy!!One is trying to establish maintain peace and some democracy, and failing (albeit, to secure business interests, whether he realizes it or not).
"Freedom" and "liberty", slogans coming from the West, but on the other hand Western governments and good section of their people support and justify occupation of other nations...Oh come on stop being silly. Its not muslims but rather extremists within muslim nations who are shaming Islam by attacking democracy in its name.
Although America is over-zealous can you honestly and without bias claim that Iraq was better off with Saddam and the Afghani's better off with the Taliban?
If America did what they're doing to a non-muslim country i bet you'd support it.
I don't understand. I didn't say anything about anyone being noble, I said the coalition and Iraqi government are very different from the Shiite death squads and Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda took credit for blowing up the Shiite shrine to incite ethnic violence and blowing up people as they stand in line to vote on the constitution of the Islamic republic of Iraq. Tashan agreed with me so can you explain your point?Oh, how noble!! Poor guy!!
"Freedom" and "liberty", slogans coming from the West, but on the other hand Western governments and good section of their people support and justify occupation of other nations...
Why is that?
If those nations would play nicely my soldiers wouldnt be getting shot at.
You call the west bad but what is your country doing to improve the quality of life in Afghanistan?
it's not killing innocent civilians i can tell you that.
Look kai, no one here likes the Taliban. But most Afghans want some kind of peaceful settlement with the Afghan Taliban. Why? Because the Taliban are Afghans. Because in many cases the local population subscribe to the Taliban ideology, as well as ancient, conservative tribal customs. If a few Taliban were holding freedom-loving Afghans hostage in every case, then they could be liberated but you can't liberate people from something they support. But the fact is that in a lot of rural areas the central Afghan government does nothing, local leaders fill the vacuum and provide some counterbalance to lawlessness, and we call them 'Taliban'. In some cases I would think some rural Afghans would rather be ruled by the Taliban than have warlords and lawlessness. We should go after Al Qaeda and support equitable government in Afghanistan, but there is no reason we MUST have a violent conflict with rural tribes that have a very conservative religious culture. Saudi Arabia has an extremely fundamentalist Islamic culture and government, most Saudis either support it or at least aren't violently against it, yet Saudi Arabia is an ally and we try (or should try) to encourage democratic reform and human rights, and capture terrorists who attacked us through PEACEFUL agreements with the Saudis. Are peaceful agreements with ALL the Afghan Taliban not possible?
Am I off base?
Check out this short documentary on Afghanistan: http://www.youtube.com/user/journeymanpictures#p/c/2C32A4BDEAD6466A/0/u-yi_lBQNEs
I dont see Arab countries clamouring to provide security and aid to Iraq,Afghanistan or Palestinians,for that matter the U>S> is the largest contributor to aid to Palestinians not Arabs. The vast majority of their sisters and brothers who are being "oppressed" are being oppressed by other Muslims but thats kind of private and none of our business until of course something happens and we intervene, then Its all "them and Us " talk you hear. You get scarce condemnation of Muslim on Muslim violence because Muslims wont argue against each other in front of unbelievers
Uhhh...sectarian violence in Iraq? Genocide of the Hazara in Afghanistan?
I'm giving examples.
What's RAWA's position on the Hazara?
I hope you aren't suggesting that countries like darkendless' and my own (Australia and Canada, respectively) purposely target civilians? In fact, Australia and Canada haven't killed very many civilians.