A lot of folks seem to think it was, though - hence my bafflement.It just doesn't mean paganism was a beacon of enlightenment for Europe or anywhere else.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A lot of folks seem to think it was, though - hence my bafflement.It just doesn't mean paganism was a beacon of enlightenment for Europe or anywhere else.
A lot of folks seem to think it was, though - hence my bafflement.
A lot of folks seem to think it was, though - hence my bafflement.
Downplaying the significant harms that theocratic laws caused throughout parts of Christendom doesn't seem to be a sound argument against the exaggerated demonization of medieval Europe.
There is a strong need to correct the exaggerated demonisation that exists as "common knowledge" though
For example, if you were a woman, or a non-elite male your best chance of getting an education was from those damned Christians, who were also the biggest preservers and translators of (proto)scientific texts, the biggest funders of scientific research, etc.
Apparently, the notion of horned helmets is one of those annoying myths.........Come on, the headgear, you've gotta love the headgear.
Come on, the headgear, you've gotta love the headgear.
In my opinion, the term "Christian dark ages" doesn't seem so outlandish when applied to events like the Inquisition, Crusades, and forced conversions. I
Christendom gave us the very idea of secularism, tho, and this was a debate in the Mediaeval age between the Pope/s and the Kings. This is a lot more nuanced than is often given credit.Of course: the goal of pointing out the harms of mixing religion and government should, in my opinion, be to highlight the importance of secularism in any equitable society, not to demonize or glorify any specific religion.
Taking a handful of out of context events (or series of events) that happened in the late middle ages or early modern period ("The Renaissance") and calling them "The Christian Dark Ages" doesn't seem like a particularly useful way to increase people's understanding of history in a balanced and critical manner.
Christendom gave us the very idea of secularism, tho, and this was a debate in the Mediaeval age between the Pope/s and the Kings. This is a lot more nuanced than is often given credit.
Apparently, the notion of horned helmets is one of those annoying myths.........
Nothing ever works the way it says it does, but this is to be human. If it were not for those debates, we wouldn't have such separation today.But then the Church threw or tried to throw the separation of religion and government out of the window at multiple later points--up to and including ones in the present age--and enabled various crimes and abusive practices as a result.
Neither medieval achievements nor later shortcomings give the full picture.
Party pooper. They sell children's plastic ones at York museum. I got one for when I storm the Houses of Parliament.Which they didn't wear.
Party pooper. They sell children's plastic ones at York museum. I got one for when I storm the Houses of Parliament.
That would be meDo you reckon some killjoy just stands outside telling 5 year olds "Actually they never wore helmets like that. You look like a complete fool. Show some self-respect."
Yes, this is the reason it was originally called that. I think folks do not understand this, so I think it's time for a new term.There *was* a European dark age. Like other dark ages, it is dark because few written records from that time period are known,
Yes, this is the reason it was originally called that. I think folks do not understand this, so I think it's time for a new term.