Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Oh him. Yeah. Think of anything disgusting that a preacher could have said and he probably said it.And another. This seems to be prevalent in the fundamentalist community.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh him. Yeah. Think of anything disgusting that a preacher could have said and he probably said it.And another. This seems to be prevalent in the fundamentalist community.
You're ignoring that has nothing ti do with knowing right from wrong, and ignored my example that demonstrates an infant's lack 9f knowledge between right and wrong.You're avoid the question of the difference between the two cases.
You're avoiding the fact that an infant will form an emotional bond with their parents, especially with their mother.
That is group that shuns psychology and biology, and they do believe in demonic possession.And another. This seems to be prevalent in the fundamentalist community.
Mirroring me won't work. The fact that both cases don't distinguish between right and wrong doesn't affect my argument that emotive response is a motivator in those cases.You're ignoring that has nothing ti do with knowing right from wrong, and ignored my example that demonstrates an infant's lack 9f knowledge between right and wrong.
Pursuit of Satan: The Police and the Occult | Office of Justice ProgramsJust a general recommend:
"In Pursuit of Satan, The Police and The Occult" by, I think, Hicks. Great book clearing up SRA nonsense from the panic.
Question.... When did satan appear in human culture/history?Satan tempted Jesus to eat rocks. That is what a 3-year old tries to do to their parents. Like what kind of mindset do Satanists have? I just don't see it.
Why do Satanists believe that Satan is better in their view to God?
Why do many, but not all, Satanists get absurd amounts of tattoos and piercings? Is it just a style choice or a meaning behind it?
From the limited interactions with Satanists I've had, they have this attitude where they believe it is okay to hurt others because they were hurt by someone else. How do they justify that and where does this attitude come from?
Im not mirroring you. I gave you an example of infant behavior that involves a lack of knowledge of goid and evil and cannot understand how the action is wrong. You cut that out. I don't knkw why, but I guess it's because it discards your focus on emotional behaviors, even though that too is not inherently tied ti knowledge of good and evil.Mirroring me won't work. The fact that both cases don't distinguish between right and wrong doesn't affect my argument that emotive response is a motivator in those cases.
You mirrored me by echoing my claim of avoidance back at me.Im not mirroring you.
You actually DID avoid something I said. I've mentioned the emotion thing at least a few times.You mirrored me by echoing my claim of avoidance back at me.
I assume that self described atheists are atheists. I assume that people who claim believers are “delusional” and their God is a myth are atheists. I believe that atheists who join religious forums with the motive of simply undermining and mocking faith are just attention seeing evil people!Actually it's exclusively Christians who assume those who challenge Christianity are atheists. Most often they're just of another religion, but Christians insist they are an atheist all the same.
Amd the lack of religious belief is also a part of that diverse backgrounds things mentioned in the mission statement.
Other religions don't have a problem with it. It's just Christians who object to atheists being here. Nobody else does that.
Methinks you just don't like atheists.I assume that self described atheists are atheists. I assume that people who claim believers are “delusional” and their God is a myth are atheists. I believe that atheists who join religious forums with the motive of simply undermining and mocking faith are just attention seeing evil people!
maybe because Satan, according to the Bible, is not such a genocidal killer of woman and children, like God is?Satan tempted Jesus to eat rocks. That is what a 3-year old tries to do to their parents. Like what kind of mindset do Satanists have? I just don't see it.
Why do Satanists believe that Satan is better in their view to God?
Why do many, but not all, Satanists get absurd amounts of tattoos and piercings? Is it just a style choice or a meaning behind it?
From the limited interactions with Satanists I've had, they have this attitude where they believe it is okay to hurt others because they were hurt by someone else. How do they justify that and where does this attitude come from?
They were also told that it would kill them. God left out the part where He just didn’t want to share power. Also, murder and the endless rules about sacrificing weren’t present.Straw man. They were told not to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Anything based on reality and fact?Why would somebody willingly become a Satanist?
To "get back at" Mom.
To be the "cool contrarian".
An excuse to wear creepy cloths all year round.
For the tattoos.
For the piercings.
So people will think you're a freak in bed when you're really not.
And it wasn’t even deceptive. The serpent told the truth.And then a talking serpent deceived Adam and Eve into disobeying God.
I doubt that you will find many people here who take the creation story seriously.
The serpent became an idol. Is John saying that Jesus became an idol?And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:
John 3:14
Job was nothing but obedient and look what happened to him.There's still the emotional attachment that a child has with their parent. A child learns that disobedience will likely lead to disapproval even though there's no understanding of the reason behind it.
I would love the psychological articles you have read about this.You're avoid the question of the difference between the two cases.
You're avoiding the fact that an infant will form an emotional bond with their parents, especially with their mother.
If I had a choice between a Satanist or a Christian babysitter for kids I don’t have, I’d pick the Satanist. They would be safer.Pursuit of Satan: The Police and the Occult | Office of Justice Programs
NCJ Number 129704
Author(s)
R D Hicks
Date Published 1991
Length 420 pages
Annotation:
This book critically analyzes individual law enforcement agencies' focus on Satanism and the occult and concludes that no evidence exists of a nationwide criminal conspiracy of Satanists and devil-worshipers.
Abstract:
The analysis emphasizes that vandalism, child abuse, serial murders, and other crimes are all serious problems. In addition, the model proposing a connection between Satanism and criminality is expedient largely because of its simplicity as a means of explaining such complex problems as drug abuse, adolescent suicide, and sexual molestation. Unfortunately, poorly trained therapists and certain police officers have used the media to focus attention on satanic crime despite a lack of evidence of a cult connection. Their misinformation and speculations produces unjustified fear in their communities. Case examples, reference notes, and index.