No, actually, I can't understand how you could get that impression
You're joking, right? You said-
the implication is clear: You feel that a belief in God is as absurd as a belief in leprechauns, which, by logical extention implies that people who do believe in God are as naive or stupid as those who believe in the creatures found in fairy tales.
I'd say that if you got
any other impression, then you should get your eyes checked. You're saying that comparing belief in God to belief in leprechauns implies that people who believe in God "are as naive or stupid as those who believe in the creatures found in fairy tales." Like leprechauns. Except,
you're the one who said that belief in fictitious creatures means you're naive or stupid, not him. Oops.
I realize that some people (especially some Christians) can come across as very self-righteous and critical of atheists.
I'd say that's a rather large understatement. Take a glance at
this.
Maybe this subtle jab is in response to those kinds of people. I don't know. But from my own perspective as a believer, God is every bit as real as I am. If you don't want to believe that, I'm fine with your decision. I wouldn't even consider telling you that you are less intelligent, moral or decent than I am, or that you're going to someday burn in the hell you don't believe in. But I resent the implication that those of us who believe in God are no more rational than those who believe in the Boogie Man, TInker Bell or the Creature from the Black Lagoon. Intelligent, rational thinking and a belief in God are not mutually exclusive.
Perhaps you should take a deep breath. Now, I can't pretend to speak for fantome profane, but the comparison between leprechauns and God needn't be a comparison between people's
intelligence; there are other parallels to be drawn.
The fact is that the existence of a transcendent God
has no truth-conditions; it is consistent with any possible states of affairs. Another way to say this is to say that it is a claim that is
unfalsifiable. And another way to say this is to say that the existence of God is
indistinguishable from fiction. So, arguably, belief in the existence of God is epistemically the same as belief in the existence of fictional entities. Like leprechauns.