Alceste
Vagabond
You realize that she inherited hardly the only mining company in Australia.
How is that relevant? Are the other mining companies doing poorly or something?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You realize that she inherited hardly the only mining company in Australia.
:foryou:
She probably believes that people are jealous of her wealth when they dislike her, she can't seem to fathom the true reason people dislike her. She's out of touch with the real world that's for sure. It's like giving you an olive slice off your pizza for exchange for washing off your table and cleaning up afterward wondering why the you're not grateful for you feeding them for pay.
I don't think she's pushing for a $2 minimum wage. I think she's pushing for businesses to have the ability to pay workers less, for the purpose of remaining competitive and strong.
If the Australian economy and coal mining industry is strong enough to where such a statement is asinine, so be it.
But, if there's truth to what she's saying, I think it's horribly unfair to attack the woman for the fact that she happens to be rich. She's not obligated to share her wealth with anyone else or to carry the coal mining business in Australia, because she's rich, and I resent the mentality that the rich have the responsibility to provide for everyone else. I agree with her to an extent.
If she's spewing lies and the Australian economy isn't in jeopardy, and the coal mining industry is booming and will continue to boom, with the mininum wage staying as is - I humbly step down from my soap box.
But, I am of the mindset that companies should be able to make provisions to maintain stability and vitality. I'd personally, rather sacrifice a dollar in pay or a portion of my benefits, if it results in stability in the long run with my job. Sometimes, this can be a temporary measure.
I think this is the type of point she's making. I don't think the $2 pay-a-day was meant to be taken literally. It was a comparison to what the folks in Africa are making and how those markets impact the Australian economy and coal mining industry.
No one is attacking her because she is rich. It is because she, as someone who runs a business, does have an obligation to pay her employees a decent wage, and the numbers she is throwing out that accompany her statement of minimum wage laws and paying what she wants is two dollars a day.But, if there's truth to what she's saying, I think it's horribly unfair to attack the woman for the fact that she happens to be rich. She's not obligated to share her wealth with anyone else or to carry the coal mining business in Australia, because she's rich, and I resent the mentality that the rich have the responsibility to provide for everyone else. I agree with her to an extent.
No one is attacking her because she is rich. It is because she, as someone who runs a business, does have an obligation to pay her employees a decent wage, and the numbers she is throwing out that accompany her statement of minimum wage laws and paying what she wants is two dollars a day.
They don't hate her "just because she's rich". They hate her because she happens to have become ridiculously rich through the labour of her employees, and instead of feeling appreciative for all their hard work making her ridiculously rich, she wants to PAY THEM LESS, so that she can become even more ridiculously rich.
Do you honestly think one person can "earn" 9 billion dollars in a single year (2011) if their industry is "failing to remain competitive"? Her hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Again, NOBODY is attacking her because she happens to be rich. They are attacking her because she is a horrible person in absolutely every respect. She's a woman who is being sued over money by her own children. A woman who sued her own mother over money. A woman who thinks an African child labourer who poisons himself with mercury for pennies a day to feed his family instead of going to school is the model employee, and we should all strive to be a little more like him. She's ruthless, utterly lacking in compassion, and her greed is limitless.
And she may actually be eating low-pay, low-skilled workers. Move over Idi Amin.
It does have some relevance; it reflects her gluttonous approach to life. Cramming the world into her already overstuffed mouth.
No one is attacking her because she is rich. It is because she, as someone who runs a business, does have an obligation to pay her employees a decent wage, and the numbers she is throwing out that accompany her statement of minimum wage laws and paying what she wants is two dollars a day.
*edit*
I don't care as to whether or not she's a piece of **** as a person. That's not the issue here, and that's the point that I'm making.
The fact that she's rich isn't an issue.
What's she suggesting, if there's truth to the fact that the African market is having a negate impact on the Australian economy, could actually be of BENEFIT to the workers within the coal mining industry within Australia.
People are looking to her as if she, directly, is obligated to share her wealth with people within the industry. She's not. It's a business. She doesn't have to share her personal wealth with the business.
And as I said before, if what she's suggesting regarding the economy and the impact of foreign markets on the economy is bogus, I humbly retract my statements.
How do you imagine that there might be any real economic issue with mining in Australia not being competitive when one mining tycoon can make nine billion dollars in a single year?
Do you not suppose the real issue might be that she wants to take money out of her employees pockets so she can stuff it into her own pockets even faster than she already is?
Then educate, me. Because, I don't understand the logic of others in this thread. If you're going to personally attack me, I hope that you'll take the time to expound upon why my logic is so absurd. Give me something useful to take from this.
I'd also appreciate a definition of the word "mouthbeather".