Yadavas Hebrews farmers. How come Jews thought Hebrews were slaves?

[Bharat Jhunjhunwala]

Exodus

Exodus is not historical record. It's a book in a religious doctrine

Religious doctrine is necessarily embedded in history. This is one method of biblical exegesis.

 

[Bthoth]

Religious doctrine is necessarily embedded in history. This is one method of biblical exegesis.

Correct, Just like the book of ma'at and Dianetics.

Have you read the emerald tablets?

Lots of religious material world wide.

Torah book of Genesis and Exodus, are just another form of theological literature, not historical record.

Imagine what was in the library of alexandria!

 

[Bharat Jhunjhunwala]

Correct, Just like the book of ma'at and Dianetics.

Have you read the emerald tablets?

Lots of religious material world wide.

Torah book of Genesis and Exodus, are just another form of theological literature, not historical record.

Imagine what was in the library of alexandria!

Prophetic statements like this not backed by research or by theologians are nearly misinformation .

 

[Bthoth]

Prophetic statements like this not backed by research or by theologians are nearly misinformation .

Exactly. Most of them are just opinions and folk lore. Very little is historical record.

 

[Bharat Jhunjhunwala]

Correct, Just like the book of ma'at and Dianetics.

Have you read the emerald tablets?

Lots of religious material world wide.

Torah book of Genesis and Exodus, are just another form of theological literature, not historical record.

Imagine what was in the library of alexandria

Exactly. Most of them are just opinions and folk lore. Very little is historical record

Let us rest for now.

 

[Sargonski]

Just because some enjoy the separation does not mean all do nor should

What about the shem (biblical)? Point is i focus on level benchmarks

No idea what trademark dna is. I comprehend that combining enables better ......... immunity and capability

Languages enable better comprehension but inbreeding does more damage

and then ghanghis enabled the greatest diversity and most

one of the same. trying to suggest being 'chosen'

Shem Shemi the Semi they used to call him .. the Black Haired People .. Sumerian Style .. then came the Akkadians running the show .. Sargon the Great Hero on which the story of Moses was Modeled.

Inbreeding ? .. you mean like the Brits ? Leads to Ugly I know .. mixture brings beauty .. of which I know first hand .. being Married to an Easern European . Speaking of the Khan .. Lots got the Khan DNA in em .. same s the Semite DNA .. If one is Caucasion .. one got some Semite Genes.

 

[River Sea]

Sargon the Great Hero on which the story of Moses was Modeled.

The Legend of Sargon (The Moses Parallel) | c. 2300 BCE

 

[Bthoth]

Shem Shemi the Semi they used to call him .. the Black Haired People .. Sumerian Style .. then came the Akkadians running the show .. Sargon the Great Hero on which the story of Moses was Modeled.

Inbreeding ? .. you mean like the Brits ? Leads to Ugly I know .. mixture brings beauty .. of which I know first hand .. being Married to an Easern European . Speaking of the Khan .. Lots got the Khan DNA in em .. same s the Semite DNA .. If one is Caucasion .. one got some Semite Genes.

semitic is a language group. The Shem idea is theological, not genetic. There are no shem jeans unless hip hop married up with Levi. Ha ha

 

[Bharat Jhunjhunwala]

The Legend of Sargon (The Moses Parallel) | c. 2300 BCE

Curious. Did Sargon lead an exodus. Did he kill a mistrite and flee. Did he confront the Pharaoh? Were their plagued?

 

[River Sea]

Have you ever wondered why Moses changed his philosophy to be exclusive against the Canaanites who believed in God? Where were the Canaanites in Ghuram or elsewhere?

How come Moses didn't like the Canaanites?

I did an English correction. I changed the sentence to Moses exclusive against the Canaanites. I first wrote it as Moses exclusive to the Canaanites. The question I have is: would both sentences mean the same? Moses Exclusive against the Canaanites, or Moses Exclusive to the Canaanites. Can someone show me if these two sentences mean the same or different?

Major question to you @Bharat Jhunjhunwala You claim Canaan is located in Ghuram (India), so that would mean the Canaanites were located in Ghuram (India). The later Hebrews arrived at a land where no humans were yet; when they arrived, were they still named Yadavas or had they changed their name to Hebrews? What caused this name change from Yadavas to Hebrews when arriving at this land that became Israel? Oh, and what about the people who traveled by sea?

What caused some people to travel on water and others to travel on land?

Krishna was at one time living closer to the sea; why not travel by sea to the land that's someday Israel? Instead of traveling by land away from the sea and then only traveling on land, what prevented Krishna from traveling by sea?

 

[crossfire]

Curious. Did Sargon lead an exodus. Did he kill a mistrite and flee. Did he confront the Pharaoh? Were their plagued?

No, the only similarities were the babies were put in a basket in a river and they were part of the royal court for a time. Sargon's mother was a priestess who broke a sexual vow and got pregnant and had to get rid of the child, so she put him in a basket in the river. The mother of Moses was trying to hide the child from executioners and couldn't hide him any longer, so she put him in a basket in the river.

 

[River Sea]

Watch the debate about the exodus that was CENSORED (with commentary)

 

[Bthoth]

No, the only similarities were the babies were put in a basket in a river and they were part of the royal court for a time. Sargon's mother was a priestess who broke a sexual vow and got pregnant and had to get rid of the child, so she put him in a basket in the river. The mother of Moses was trying to hide the child from executioners and couldn't hide him any longer, so she put him in a basket in the river.

and since Moses was born and then raised in egypt. An egyptian he has always been.

And since he lived in the house of pharaoh, then talking with god was as easy as coming home for dinner conversations.

 

[crossfire]

Oh, and the Euphrates river was specifically named in the Sargon legend, as there are different rivers in the area. The Egyptians just called the Nile "the river," as it is the only river in that area.

 

[River Sea]

and since Moses was born and then raised in egypt. An egyptian he has always been.

And since he lived in the house of pharaoh, then talking with god was as easy as coming home for dinner conversations.

@Bthoth What were the Pharaohs, or pharaoh names, whom Moses lived with? If Moses had remained with the pharaoh or pharaohs, would Moses be a pharaoh too?

 

[Bthoth]

@Bthoth What were the Pharaohs, or pharaoh names, whom Moses lived with? If Moses had remained with the pharaoh or pharaohs, would Moses be a pharaoh too?

Back a couple decades, i did a bunch of work on that very question.

Moses the character could be Ahkenatan, the historical pharaoh.

But I am not digging into that any further.. In fact that's the first time, that I wrote that line in a long long time.


I just did a quick search. Apparently I was not the only one to have the idea.

WOW! Shocking how much material is now written on the very same scope.

 

[River Sea]

Moses the character could be Ahkenatan, the historical pharaoh.

Heres the book on Aknaten was Moses the same as the Egyptian prince Akhnatin, do we have any real proof of who Moses was?Moses and Akhenaten one and the same person - Graham Hancock Official Website

@Riders Egyptian born Ahmed Osman, believes that he has been able to find the answers for these questions which bewildered scholars for centuries. He claims that Moses of the Bible is no other than King Akhenaten who ruled Egypt for 17 years in the mid-14th century BC.

This says mid-14th century BC that King Akhenaten ruled KMT for 17 years. Egypt is KMT because no vowels of yet?

@ChieftheCef I saw else where you were explaining that Akhenaten invented monotheism in a practical way. Why would Akhenaten do that? How was this practical?

So @ChieftheCef the practical is due to power then. It's Kings wanting power?

There's light who lives in all of us. Inner 'I' we all carry, that's spiritual and light feeds us fire (spiritual food) God lives in all of us. Light is we drink from.

So this situation that Akhenaten Moses, KMT or Moses Krishna Indus Valley were into power, so reason monotheism, @Bharat Jhunjhunwala as you shared Moses changed? What was Moses beliefs before he changed, before he left Indus Valley? Moses Krishna thinks monotheism before leaving Indus Valley.

The Canaanites believe in monotheism?

Kings either associated with sun or moon then had their family trees. Krishna came from the sun family tree.

Ra means sun, was Akhenaten Moses family tree and Krishna came from the sun family tree. Am I understanding correctly?

I don't know who Akhenaten killed and fled?
Moses killed a Mitsrite and fled and Krishna killed Kamsa and fled

@Bharat Jhunjhunwala was asking if Akhenaten killed anyone and fled

 

[River Sea]

Indus Valley explains more about all over burnt bake bricks
Egypt KMT build with stone

Back when there were Kings, how did Kings manage with their people skills? Who taught them their people skills?

What type of people skills did Krishna have compare to other kings?

 

[crossfire]

Indus Valley explains more about all over burnt bake bricks
Egypt KMT build with stone

Back when there were Kings, how did Kings manage with their people skills? Who taught them their people skills?

What type of people skills did Krishna have compare to other kings?

Egypt reserved the stone for temples. Other buildings were mud brick, even the palaces were made of mud brick.
You can see Egyptians making mudbricks in a painting of the tomb of the Vizier Rekhmire starting at 3:00 of this youtube video.

 

[Aupmanyav]

People of the region where Krishna is supposed to have his kingdom were good at trade. The Kutchi, Gujarati, they are still good at it.