A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
How do I know the Bible isn't just a bunch of stories written by ancient goat-herders?
Ancient goat-herders weren't literate.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How do I know the Bible isn't just a bunch of stories written by ancient goat-herders?
I'd say that standing by and doing nothing while evil occurs doesn't get rid of the problem. Choosing not to stop evil doesn't mean you're "having nothing to do with evil". If you're aware of the evil, then you're involved... regardless of the course of action (or inaction) you choose.im going to make a leap and say yes, God can have nothing to do with evil, but we choose to flirt with it then rather than destroying us he withdraws from us so that he can bring us back to him.
What bearing does God being a personal god have on the matter?God is not just a perfectly good God, he is also personal, and so rather than destroy us right away he tolerates evil in an attempt to allow us to repent, at the end of the age though all bets are off and all these points come into play. except evil wont exist.
Ancient goat-herders weren't literate.
Then who authored my copy of the Idiots Guide to Ancient Goat-Herding?
Then who authored my copy of the Idiots Guide to Ancient Goat-Herding?
Many Christians say that God expresses his intentions through the Bible. Didnt he say to Noah that he was going to commit near genocide because people werent doing what he said? That seems pretty evil to me. Yet, your argument is that he might just have an unknown reason that He isn't telling. Hitler said he was killing the Jews to further the master race, but you cannot know for sure that he didn't have an really good unknown reason that he wasn't telling. Right?tarasan said:well mostly I would disagree with that because lets be frank, they arnt omniscent, and they stated their reasons for doing what they did quite openly didnt they? the fact is that while we have evidence for what people do and what they intend through their actions and what they say we dont really have that from God do we?
If we cannot deduce anything about God from his actions, then not only can we not call him evil, we can't call him ANYTHING. Not loving. Not almighty. Not He. Nothing. Be careful about going down that road.so while we can deduce what people are like through there actions we cant do it with God.
and again let me ask you this it is fact that we dont know enough to call God evil or uncaring so why naturally assume that from our view he is?
That makes no sense. Some people in heaven will have suffered tremendously and some hardly at all. Certainly there are people on earth who have already suffered more than some people in heaven and yet they still sin. How do you account for that?tarasan said:no because people will have gone through the suffering here on earth, so that when they do get into heaven they will not do what adam did.
tarasan said:William Lane Craig explains why God permits evil and suffering « Wintery Knight
he can explian it better than me.
tarasan said:William Lane Craig explains why God permits evil and suffering « Wintery Knight
he can explian it better than me.
I have to confess that the argument from evil and suffering lost all force for me when I began to think of it as the argument from self-centered hedonism, or the argument from whining.
From Mr. Craig
Yeah! You know who I hate? Those whiny little Hedonistic brats in the pediatric cancer ward. "oh mommy! Please make it stop hurting! Oh mommy! I want to grow up and have a life!". Who do they think they are!
Mball is essensially presenting a flaw in theism that is in the Epicurean question, "If God is good and powerful, why doesn't God just make us as we will be in heaven."
Well, I don't know. I can simply say first that in Christian tradition, that's just the way that it is. Christianity typically blames humanity for the state that we are in - and God did create us without sin in a perfect environs - and we are redeemed to everlasting life through Christ. This theology is fundamentally flawed to many people, but IMHO we can lay all of our anger towards God on the cross of Christ.
But I have thought of it like this. God is redeemed through Christ as well as humanity, and God will recoincile humanity to Godself on a cosmic level when God chooses.
can i ask how?
it seems to me that this is logically incoherant.
to make someone be happy is to violate their free will, God cant give/and not give us free will, its illogical
at least thats how I see it.
God can indeed force people to be happy, and man does not have free will.
God is Sovereign over all things in His universe. Every molecule and every atom move according to His decree, which He purposed in Himself from eternity, before the universe was formed. Man has a will, but his will is corrupt and in bondage to the rule and dominion of sin.
By nature, man cannot choose that which pleases God. This is a result of the fall, whereby Adam fell and all his posterity with him. However, God can make a man willing in the day of His power, and so He does, to draw souls to Christ in saving faith. All that God the Father gives to His Son Jesus Christ, will come to Christ and be saved. In these cases, God makes men willing to believe in Jesus, whereas they could not previously.
Turning to someone you think can solve a problem with your faith that you can't figure out...the intellectual cartwheel...
I'd say that standing by and doing nothing while evil occurs doesn't get rid of the problem. Choosing not to stop evil doesn't mean you're "having nothing to do with evil". If you're aware of the evil, then you're involved... regardless of the course of action (or inaction) you choose.
What bearing does God being a personal god have on the matter?
Many Christians say that God expresses his intentions through the Bible. Didnt he say to Noah that he was going to commit near genocide because people werent doing what he said? That seems pretty evil to me. Yet, your argument is that he might just have an unknown reason that He isn't telling. Hitler said he was killing the Jews to further the master race, but you cannot know for sure that he didn't have an really good unknown reason that he wasn't telling. Right?
If we cannot deduce anything about God from his actions, then not only can we not call him evil, we can't call him ANYTHING. Not loving. Not almighty. Not He. Nothing. Be careful about going down that road.
From Mr. Craig
Yeah! You know who I hate? Those whiny little Hedonistic brats in the pediatric cancer ward. "oh mommy! Please make it stop hurting! Oh mommy! I want to grow up and have a life!". Who do they think they are!
That makes no sense. Some people in heaven will have suffered tremendously and some hardly at all. Certainly there are people on earth who have already suffered more than some people in heaven and yet they still sin. How do you account for that?
Hitler only tried to wipe out the Jewish people once.tarasan said:Im sorry this is just silly, God only did extreme judgments on the rares of occasions,
Well...yeah! His goal was to kill every person on the planet except for one family. Did you read the story?its not like he set out to do that, that wasnt his ultiamte Goal was it? to wipe people out?
Hitlers however was he blatantly stated that it was to the extend were there could be no other reason.
We can deduce that is loving
Merciful
saved from sins etc
tarasan said:awesome thanks for the confirmation of his point.