QUOTE=sunrise123;396074
In the Quran there are 99 (depending on the source) names of God or attributes of God are there not? So I'm not bothered by Christianity having in three aspects of God. Of course there's a theological difference between how Muslims view Muhammad and how Christians view Jesus, but a number is not significant. And as a side-note at least some Hindus feel the same way - that all the names are really aspects of one God.
...
This leads to a question about what your is view of Shi'a Islam (and other groups)?
These are name of Allah or attributes, as you stated, that describe Him. They are not to be confused with saying that God can be a person which have needs or a spirit. For example, the All-knowledgeable is another name/attribute of Allah. All-Merciful is another one. I suggest you see the list of the 99 attributes.
About Shia Islam, I hear lots of things about them, but I haven't met any.
If these were true, I still don't believe that all people are alike and I don't generalize.
As far as being a system of life, Islam is that. But also St. Francis of Assisi showed that true Christianity is also a system of life that can be lived on Earth - not that it's easy, of course. All religions have an ethical, moral and system of behavior that true believers are expected to strive to live up to. And it's only with the rise of Protestant Christianity has government and religion been separated.
Well before I would discuss that I would like to know what is meant by true Christianity? If it means that if you would bring back the Injeel as it was revealed to Jesus peace be upon him and follow it, than I agree because in that way Injeel is also a revelation from God. If that isn't what true Christianity means than never mind.
As far as government and religion in general wouldn't you agree that the Compact of Medina, although being a document of it's time and place, is a philosophical model of religious pluralism in government.
I dont think I have enough information and understanding of the concepts to answer that.
The reason I asked about the Hudud punishments is that, for me and many others, they are the most problematical aspects of the Quran at least as literally read. There are those
Appendix 37 of the Authorized English translation of Quran by Rashad Khalifa, Ph.D. | Submission.org - Your best source for Submission (Islam) who have a different view of them.
As a side point, we agree on ISIS.[/QUOTE]
I understand that, on a side not, the first condition for the hudud punishments is that there must be a caliphate.
Other thing we should note if that if Hudud where true, the purpose of them is to deter people from doing. For example, not one condition of stoning woman was reported at the times of the prophet except in the cases when the woman her self spoke it out and said that she did this and that.
K.S.A is a place where the thief would have his hand cut. It is the only place where you can leave your car with the keys in the street.
Once it was reported about the caliphate omar that he forgave those who were stealing because he figured out that their employee wasn't giving them enough money.
Other thing one should note that many people prefer to have their hand cut off rather than spending time in prison away from family.