McBell
Unbound
I do not know.Why be rude if I'm just going to justify it right after??
Why did you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I do not know.Why be rude if I'm just going to justify it right after??
Maybe in Canada; not here
No, I didn't say many - you said I doubt you'll find someone and I was saying no, I definately can.Here you're just being argumentative and/or willfully ignorant. You can't possibly believe that many people would agree that abortions at 20 weeks are acceptable without extenuating circumstances.
No, it is not about that AT ALL... I respect LIFE. You respect INCONVENIENCESaying it's a matter of me not respecting life and you respecting it is childish and ridiculous, and shows an ignorance on the whole topic. I know you can do better than that.
That is not why I don't do them.
How about the fact that I just know better... -_-
Why would this entire national issue be taking place if it stated in the law what a human is??You say this as if you know it for a fact. Unless you have something to back up your claim, I'll assume you just don't know our legal system very well.
I didn't.I do not know.
Why did you?
No, I didn't say that. I said it didn't become a BIG issue until then.
Didn't abortions really start around the 60s and 70s?
Before, it was probably extremely rare. If it was a common thing, the issue would have been dealt with a long time ago.
You are missing my point completely. It was not big enough for there to be major controversy about it. If it was, a Roe vs. Wade would have happened a long time ago.Don't get hung up on my use of the term"really".
1) Abortions were not extremely rare
2) The history of abortifacients is rather long. Whether or not there was much success in their use we do know that efforts to terminate a pregnancy have been around for a long time.
No, I didn't say many - you said I doubt you'll find someone and I was saying no, I definately can.
No, it is not about that AT ALL... I respect LIFE. You respect INCONVENIENCE
You are missing my point completely. It was not big enough for there to be major controversy about it. If it was, a Roe vs. Wade would have happened a long time ago.
Why would I lie unless I meant to be sarcastic...?
Because there are those who disagree with said legal definition and are working to get it changed.Why would this entire national issue be taking place if it stated in the law what a human is??
Why would this entire national issue be taking place if it stated in the law what a human is??
You should see teenagers nowadays... :/ It's sick really...OK, well, who is this person you know you can find. I've never met anyone who would support that.
SLAVERY was big, but the CONTROVERSY wasn't. It wasn't until the questioning of it grew big that something was done about it.Ever heard of slavery. It was big and around for thousands of years before people made a big deal of it.
Maybe it's just me, but if you said not to be rude, I wouldn't take it in a rude way, no.It's not about lying. It's about realizing that calling someone a murderer is without exception insulting. What if I said "Not to be rude, but you're a whore"? Would that be OK simply because I said "Not to be rude"?
Please tell me where it defines what a human isBecause there are those who disagree with said legal definition and are working to get it changed.
Umm exactly...?Why would any abortions be legal if conception began human life equal to you and me?