sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
dawny0826 said:Again...not a flame...I'm just very interested in understanding where you're coming from here...
So...do you believe in portions of the bible only or do you simply believe that a great percentage of it is symbolic?
I'm not trying to be a pain in the rear and you can let me know if I am...
What is the Bible to you? Summarize what the central focuses are to you? And what themes don't fly with you at all.
(Squirt...again...apologies. If I'm derailing your thread...say the word and I'll post this elsewhere. )
I'm not taking it as a flame. I realize that my viewpoint is out of the ordinary, and maybe even a little threatening. But, hey! You're interested in listening!
I believe that the Bible is inspired work, but written by human beings from unique perspectives, and influenced by factors of time, place and culture, as well as politics.
I do not believe in the infallibility of the Bible. I do not believe that the Bible should be placed in supremacy above God's grace and loving acts.
I think the overriding message of the Bible is God's boundless love for us. Therefore, I always look for the message of inclusivity, grace, acceptance, mercy, love, friendship, compassion whenever I read the Bible -- especially in passages that overtly talk about condemnation and judgment.
I also place great emphasis on my own experiences of God. I find that much of the Bible consists of written accounts of people's experiences with God. I don't believe those experiences began with Genesis and ended with Revelation. I think we still encounter God in significant ways today, and that those encounters have to be taken seriously. If I find that an encounter with God conflicts with what I find written in the Bible, I generally trust my experience over the written Biblical account. Jesus did the same thing! In several places he says, "You have heard it said," or "It is written...but I tell you that..." Jesus eschews scripture for his own experience -- and so do I at times.
Themes about wrath, judgment, condemnation, predestination, hatred, destruction, impatience -- these images just do not ring true in my experience of God. I generally discount them, because they don't paint a true picture of the nature of God, which is unconditional and unbounded love. I also think that there's nothing wrong with assessing and ascribing higher priority to some passages than to others. Those that speak of love always receive higher priority than those that speak of condemnation.
I realize that I'm killing a sacred cow for many, many Christians, and that this is a fairly unpopular stance to take. But it's the only way I can live with myself, knowing what I know and believing what I believe about the nature of God.