Sounds extremely random. No campaigning, so anybody might get a few votes. So, how many actual votes do the winners get? And even without campaigning, I'll bet most people vote for people they've heard of, well-known Baha'i teachers or speakers, or they vote for the incumbents. A person could, without formerly campaigning, make a name for himself by doing things that gets him noticed as an "outstanding" Baha'i.
When I was around Baha'is the same people were elected to the LSA for three years. Plus, the same lady was voted as a representative every year. I just did a search, and of course I found some ex-Baha'i articles...
Baha’i Electoral System In one article it said, “THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE BODY HAS ONLY SEEN CHANGE DUE TO DEATH OR RETIREMENT: NO MEMBER HAS EVER BEEN ELECTED OFF THE UHJ.” Here's what it said next...
1-The most important trend is that we have, since 2008, a membership drawn completely from the ITC – which itself is appointed by the Universal House of Justice. So in essence, there is a closed loop with the UHJ appointing its future candidates. This also shows that ITC acts as screening committee for future UHJ members.
2-By having UHJ members constantly elected from the ITC, it is almost a type of silent campaigning going on. These individuals are given a visible role in front of NSA’s whereas any normal Baha’i out there would never stand a chance to be known. This guarantees no fresh blood- new Baha’is who are outside of the loop of administration who could possibly bring in a different perspective. Hence you only get people who are inside the system who will perpetuate the same thought patterns. And you get these people because they are the only ones paraded in front of the NSA’s!
Is this true, and if it is, do have any problem with it, or is it okay?