This I have done but short of subscribing to a scientific institution to read research papers I can find no evidence of a solid answer
[/COLOR]
[COLOR=black]
Because science has discovered everything?
I did say science would explain this was done by natural means. My point wasn't about trashing evolution it was about atheists using science to refute all supernatural which they simply cannot do. I was told several times that the question was philosophical, so I asked if , philosophically...
Would it be fair to say that science has not deducted how the egg laying creature first came into existence other than to say it was a natural process, i.e. in the beginning there must have been something that laid the first egg! Please dont accuse me of not understanding the general theme of...
Still, even though I'm obviously nonsensicle, not to mention poorly informed, I would like to know if there are any scientific findings about how the bird(or dinosaur)/egg evolved?
Thanks for that, however I don't really want the question to get lost in multi subject post, but if no one comes forward I may well use that thread.
Also, Saying birds evolved from dinosaurs is mearly shifting the connundrum to 'what came first, the dinosaur or the egg' ;)
Seriously, I've always been curious to know what scientists think about which came first, the chicken or the egg. Is there an evolutionary process that describes this? BTW, I'm not trying to disprove evolution, I am genuinly interested.
But who programmed it? How and why does one chemical know how to react against another. Surley that could speak of design at the vary base level couldn't it?
Ok, thanks for that. I take your points on board and can see how people have taken me the wrong way and how I have stepped on a few toes. :sorry1:
Note self: Must try harder
I didn't actually realize I was giving the impression that I was getting upset, I guess that's the limitation of internet forums, I can assure you I am in no way upset, I was just trying to get my point across. I dont know how to do it without incurring the wrath of you people. I am open to a...
I said people with a casual attitude to DNA not Ph.d geneticists who certainly don't have a casual attitude, I hope. BTW I have no intention of getting into a slanging match with you so I won't answer anymore derogatory posts.
Well that's a different subject open to debate though a riveting one. Just leaving room for a designer opens up a whole new world of possibilitites. It could be a God, Gods or aliens. Who knows at this point. No one knows anything for certain which ever way you look at it and while its good to...