That is not what you said the first time. You didn't talk about most early HIV patients. The statement you made early was most certainly ignorant. If you want to change that statement to reflect something less ignorant, like what you are trying to come up with now, that would be a good idea...
I dunno Terry, our justice system relies on getting at the truth and we have more than an intangible interest in justice especially if we have been wronged.
I don't know what is meant by ultimate truth so I can't distinguish between truth and ultimate truth. We rely on people to be objective...
Go back and read my comment more carefully, I wasn't refuting your claim; I was observing that I would love it if you could back it up. I already know the value of your claim, I don't need to refute it.
No such thing as bad advertising huh .... I'm not so sure.
I like this quote ...
"The crucial point here is that a scientist is, essentially by definition, a methodological naturalist; however, she does not have any specific commitment (aside from her own metaphysical views) to philosophical naturalism. In other words, science does not necessarily...
What do you think of this?
Metaphysical naturalism entails the belief that nature is in fact all that exists.
Methodological naturalism entails the belief that for one reason or another empirical methods will only ascertain natural facts, whether supernatural facts exist or not.
I have no idea what your faith is but I can tell you that faith in anything can be determined to exist on a probability continuum. Here is an example of what I mean, there is a higher probability that the popular notion of Santa Clause (ie. Santa can make to everybody’s chimney in one...