I'm so sorry. Get all communications between you and her together in a file for easy access so that you can show police and/or a court if they need to become involved. Every email, every text, with time stamps. If she prevents you from moving out any of your stuff, call the police and ask them...
I don't know if you're familiar with this, but Trump lies pathologically. Examples are legion. The mystery votes weren't there, and thus Trump lost Georgia because the SoS did his job, despite Trump attempting to pressure him otherwise. Again I ask you: how is that not election interference?
I'm undecided. I wouls move to a different part of the US if the opportunities were promising enough (especially if I was moving with a significant other). Another country seems like it would be much more difficult, and I'm not sure where I'd want to move. I'm a weather wuss due to living in...
When you pressure an election official not to certify the results of an election until they "find" enough votes for you to win, how is that not election interference, in any reasonable sense?
When Trump called the Georgia Secretary of State and asked him to find 11,000 votes for him so he could win, was that an official act or an unofficial one?
The terms 'conservatism' and 'liberalism' have both changed over time and also differ between countries.
American conservatism has traditionally been characterized, ironically, by the values we'd now call 'classical liberalism': individualism, freedom of speech/religion, capitalism, etc...
A test for what? What substance do you want him tested for? Cocaine? What evidence do you have that cocaine enhances cognitive performance or masks dementia or any such thing?
https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/000946.htm
You missed it. The point of the parable is that both faith and works are important.
How would one pray the Lord's Prayer without faith?
You're now demanding that literally every passage of the Bible explicitly mention both faith and works in order to concede the point here?
This is getting...
Of course. And your interpretation, frankly, is at odds with pretty much all the surrounding evidence: the internal evidence from the text itself, as I've repeatedly shown, and the external evidence of what early Christians actually believed.
This is more rather silly reasoning, Dave. Let me...
No one is denying that using science has taught us a lot about the natural world, and I have no doubt it will continue to do so.
Outside its purview, science will continue to not be applicable.
Not seeing how this is any less a faith position.
No serious religious person (much less philosopher) wants to get rid of science. You have a false dichotomy in your head.
I can appreciate that. I recently came across a group of sidewalk fire-and-brimstone street preachers in my own city and thought...who do these dudes think they're convincing? This just makes them look bad.
But if we want to be serious about trying to understand a text as it's intended to be...
This is a category error. Earlier generations of humans didn't think of the natural explanations they discovered as replacing the divine. They believed the natural explanations were how God creates and sustains the world. They didn't see the dichotomy that some do now between natural and...