This is a strange hypothetical because humans depend on other life to survive. So you'd have to somehow radically alter human nature for us to survive in the absence of all other life.
Bottom line: Medical procedures exist that insurers are prohibited from covering. Thus members of Congress tried to pass legislation to prevent governments from prohibiting insurers from covering IVF.
That's really it. :shrug:
That's been my anecdotal experience as well, with family and friends. I do have one lefty friend who moved to Montana because she's an outdoorsy type, but that was a few years ago.
I love when conservatives are so upset by the reality of markets...when more people move to your area (increasing...
I'm not seeing an edit that would change my clarifying question.
By the way, don't you live in Texas?
https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/texas/abortion-policies
Abortion policies currently in effect in Texas include the following:
Abortion is completely banned with very limited...
And where it isn't....they can't. For the 5th time.
It matters to the people who don't live in those states. And to people who live in other states where it's partially or mostly illegal.
So what?
Where abortion is illegal, insurers can't cover it.
Thus the legislation. Which Republicans...
Even if that's true (I suspect it isn't universally) what does that have to do with the price of eggs? If the procedure is illegal, insurers can't cover it. Thus the legislation prevents the government from doing that.
Yes, this means the government can't prohibit a health insurer from covering the procedure.
Yeah, that's what insurance...is. Are you against the concept of all insurance?