How is that different than what I said? You pointed out clauses as though they invalidated what I said. I pointed out that any such treaties would have such clauses. I'm pretty sure I nailed it.
I said he could have backed out of the treaty. You argued that he couldn't unless there was a clause that allowed it. I pointed out that all treaties of this kind have that stipulation built in.
You tried to claim I was wrong, I showed you I wasn't.
Now if you have anything else I can...
There is no such clause because there was no treaty from congress. But virtually all treaties have such clauses, especially treaties with nations where tensions are strained. They are there to allow the president to react quickly to problems that crop up. So the point is, any such treaty...
If Iran's goal were to destroy Israel, they would not go about it by launching 20 small rockets into a territory of Israel. There are factions within Iran that did not want the nuclear deal. They saw it as too restrictive. Nobody can say for sure, but my theory is that the attack was an...
The Times was reporting a few days ago that the Trump team was prepping Trump for questioning. If I recall correctly, they said the staff spent 4 hours with Trump and made it through 2 questions.
Yeah sure. Just like Bush had all of his CIA experts telling him Iraq had weapons that didn't exist.
I have no doubt that Iran hasn't given up on all their nuclear ambitions. But to claim that we are better off without a deal that allows inspectors and allows closer monitoring is silly...
Makes perfect sense to me. A conservative christian going to Liberty University isn't going to get more liberal. And a liberal going to NYU isn't going to get more conservative.
Well Europe is pissed at us over Trumps tariffs, now the US broke a deal that benefits Europe. Flip sides? Probably not. But if they can continue the deal with Iran without us, I have no doubt they will. Germany is loving their new role as global leader.
You have a skewed view of how...
Of course there is. Otherwise we could literally look into any of their weapons programs or other initiatives without any warning. Something that would be guaranteed to sink the deal. You cannot just move a nuclear installation capable of making weapons grade material without signs of it...
It would not have made an ounce of difference.
Analysis | If the Iran deal had been a Senate-confirmed treaty, would Trump have been forced to stay in? Nope.
There are plenty of examples of ratified treaties being overturned by Presidents.
You think Russia has a shortage of this material? They have it stockpiled (just as we do). Who it goes to is less important than that it isn't in Iranian hands.
Russia loves that Trump is pulling out. It means one of two things.
The likely scenario is that the Iran deal moves...
Actually we have the exact same problem people complained about in the last administration. Sure, we have some more people working the counter at Arby's but the overall picture is the same. And is about to get worse as the impact of Trumps trade talk is going to come home to roost unless he...
Okay but below 4% bit ignores a pretty big farce. People are working but where? And manufacturing is slightly on the up sweep. No where near recovering even a small percentage of what has been lost.
The article title is right in another way it doesn't even address. The inequality of...