• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A Universe from Nothing?

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Actually it has more evidence, though, inasmuch as there is zero evidence for GodDidIt, this isn't a particularly high bar.
removing cause and effect from science would be difficult.....a high bar
so to speak

and science will insist.....nothing moves without something to move it
and substance will remain at rest until that something comes along

God set all things in motion
substance is not self motivating
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
hey Thief,
Before 'motion', how did 'God' move ?
What 'causes' inertia, without motion ?
Other than....'goddidit'.
~
'mud
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
hey Thief,
Before 'motion', how did 'God' move ?
What 'causes' inertia, without motion ?
Other than....'goddidit'.
~
'mud
we get to ask Him when we get 'there'

kinda difficult to grip the notion of motion without 'something created'
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
And one other trouble:
How does anything 'move' without 'time' ?
~
'mud
time is a measure
Man created the measure, to help his poor wittle head wrap around events in relation to each other

the motion would be there as soon as Someone touches off on the substance
the measure was not required
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
Oh yes....the problem of 'there',
what with Hubble's mirror and lens, we can 'see' much further now.
And we still can't find the 'there' !
~
'mud
 
Last edited by a moderator:

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
A 'measure' it is now, but before the 'motion' created by 'God',
and the inflation and all, and stars and stuff, before 'motion',
WHO touched anything to 'cause' 'motion' in the 'nothingness'.
And of course...what 'substance' was 'there' to be touched,
from outside the singularity.....where was that 'time' !
~
'mud
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
I would imagine, No Creator would equal No creation (us) - Revelation 4:11
Interesting. So God existed before he created anything. What if he simply never had decided to create anything he wouldn't be a Creator just a god existing all alone. But because of infinite regression he would never reach the time when he decided to create something so it's impossible for us to be here if God didn't have a start too...
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Oh yes....the problem of 'there',
what with Hubble's mirror and lens, we can 'see' much further now.
And we still can't find the 'there' !
~
'mud
not really a problem.....
it's closer than you think

just keep breathing until.....you can't
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
I am surprised that even with the proof I have provided you are still not clear about existence of God and the holy mission of Bahaullah. Did not he have a vision of the maiden from God? :)
:) But what does that have to do with the question why there is a God in the first place instead of no God?
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
It is essentially a mystical experience.

"At that hour will the mystic Herald “through the trumpet-blast of knowledge, will awaken the heart, the soul, and the spirit from the slumber of negligence. ...

he (the seeker) will find himself endowed with a new eye, a new ear, a new heart, and a new mind.”

“and will, led by its perfume, attain and enter the City of Certitude.”

Baha'u'llah - The Book of Certitude
If I got "a new eye, a new ear, a new heart, and a new mind" I wouldn't be me anymore but somebody else...
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
If I got "a new eye, a new ear, a new heart, and a new mind" I wouldn't be me anymore but somebody else...
physically?.....as in new body?

or waking up without your memories......?

saw a documentary about a guy that did just that.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Yes, we have a language problem here. The question is not about absolute reality but what that is supposed to be. Something existing or void. It does not involve any problem of duality/non-duality.

Of course, I know that I am what exists or what does not exist, whichever, as in reality everything else also is. Again, no problem about non-duality. I am exploring my own reality. Hope you get my point.
But the universe is absolute reality....there is nothing else in existence... and it is what it is...ONE and eternal.. Those who think it reasonable that it is possible for it to not exist...either in the past or in the future...need to explain how it can made into nothing in order for there to be any plausibility and that they can not do...

The meditative mind has no problem seeing the eternal nature of existence....and simultaneously the absurdity of the universe not existing... The dualistic mind otoh can not imagine a non-beginning to anything at all, for everything it perceives lives and dies..and thus projects this temporary nature onto absolute existence itself...
 
Top