When I see a war crime… I will point it out.
Then point out Israel's war crimes, not just Hamas'.
Stopping electricity to limit the capacity of Hamas is a strategic necessity, not a war crime.
Both false. There was nothing "strategically necessary" about cutting off power to an area populated by over two million civilians, and it is a war crime.
/ Robbing gas that keeps the lights on for the hospitals of your own people is a war crime.
Preventing gas from entering civilian areas is also a war crime.
Shooting missiles against military targets is no a war crime.
Shooting missiles into civilian-populated areas without sufficient reason is.
Placing military targets next to children and shooting missiles towards innocent people is a war crime.
I agree. They're both bad.
What part do you not understand?
The part where you deny the war crimes of one and not the war crimes of the other. You'll never see war crimes with this level of bias.
For example, as I have repeatedly pointed out now, the IDF is not JUST targeting military targets. For decades now, war crimes and illegal annexation have been occurring on the west bank
despite the fact that Hamas do not control the west bank. If your argument is that Israel's war crimes are justified because of "strategic necessity" then please explain to me why they continue to commit war crimes against
where Hamas aren't even located.
And if you fail to understand this, then answer this question: Do you think Israel would apply the same level of response if Hamas were hiding amongst a civilian population
of Israelis and using them as human sheilds. Yes or no?