When it's over-reacting.When did kinda irked, aka kinda annoyed, become seen as a severe reaction?
Is it a snowflake thing?
A Karen thing?
A woke thing?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When it's over-reacting.When did kinda irked, aka kinda annoyed, become seen as a severe reaction?
Is it a snowflake thing?
A Karen thing?
A woke thing?
When it's over-reacting.
When over-reacting to somethingWhen did kinda irked, aka kinda annoyed, become seen as an overreaction?
Ok lolWhen over-reacting to something
unworthy of any reaction at all...
...other than amusement.
Btw... Other than amusement? What a joke.When over-reacting to something
unworthy of any reaction at all...
...other than amusement.
The specific instance cited does stem from the application of an ideology, but I understand what you're saying.It's not even an ideology. Most people don't have to bother with have you had surgeries, health complications and chronic pain. I've had to do that since i was a kid (bad knees).
It's like in healthcare debates when someone wants to claim the young only need "catastrophy insurance," but that's not the case and some do need more.
Healthcare cannot evolve around averages. And such screenings are necessary to best serve all patients.
Shows how little you've been paying attention.It seem those who just cannot accept their natural state seems incredibly disjointed and conflicted.
No, it's no ideology except proper healthcare that believes all patients should be cared for and respected.The specific instance cited does stem from the application of an ideology, but I understand what you're saying.
The best part is how it makes the youth turn away from the Bible and Church. And because Christians widely won't give any consideration to apostates and nonbelievers they'll keep blaming wicked people who just wantto sin for their religion's decline and hopeful future demise.Don't you know?
Being trans, fragile X, etc....that's an ideology.
Check your Bible.
I think we're talking about different things. But I don't think it's important that I chase anything here. So I'm bowing out. Thanks for the replies.No, it's no ideology except proper healthcare that believes all patients should be cared for and respected.
Point out the over reaction in my OP.
Several have said I overreacted but yet haven't pointed it out.
I can only guess you think this was an overreaction.
"3. Do you identify as a male or female? To which I answered I am male through and through as I was born. I am a male and that's that!"
Do you know the meaning of that's that?
that's that....
-its not going to change
-there is nothing more to do or say about the matter.
Its not an overreaction, its fact. The receptionist understood that and said "ok lets move on"
Maybe its a country thing.
Kinda like telling my.grandkids "not more candy and that's that"
The overreaction is the fact that you decided to post an OP about being "irked", in a debate sub forum, over what many see as a non-issue at all.
I'm sure dad's who have been wronged in court regarding custody of his kids will be glad to know.But in the USA the male and female roles have pretty much been eliminated from society.
And not to mention answering questions in a way that shows impatients and lack of understanding of what was being asked. It's no wonder the person taking the information seems to have been fkustered over such a response over a routine question. Such rudeness towards them over such a thing is definitely an overreaction.The overreaction is the fact that you decided to post an OP about being "irked", in a debate sub forum, over what many see as a non-issue at all.
Can you give examples of how what constitutes a man vs woman changes from culture to culture?I was speaking of my culture as example. Not as a model to follow.
I'm sure they already know.I'm sure dad's who have been wronged in court regarding custody of his kids will be glad to know.
That's not the case and dads still get the raw end of the deal when it comes to custody.I'm sure they already know.
What does this have to do with a culture of Gender roles being eliminated in the USA?That's not the case and dads still get the raw end of the deal when it comes to custody.
That's not the case and dads still get the raw end of the deal when it comes to custody.
Because gender norms are still alive, strong and thriving. Custody cases easily demonstrate this.What does this have to do with a culture of Gender roles being eliminated in the USA?