Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No,not our way. I would offer we should do it God's Way, using the advice God has given us via the Messengers.Be reasonable, do it my way?
Christians do not follow Mosaic law.
Muslims do not acknowledge the Christ of the Christian Bible.
They are separate and independent religions, although there is some crossover.
Why not instead: You are welcome to your beliefs, but don't try to change mine to conform to yours
Then the people of the world would get on with their own quiet faith, rather than proselytizing and judging and criticizing other religions.
Are you saying I'm dishonest for stating my sincerely held belief that accusing a people of propheticide who in most cases certainly had nothing to do with it and in the remaining few cases it is unlikely they had anything to do with it is unwise?One does not have to be a Baha'i, want to be a Baha'i and is not being asked to be a Baha'i, to note what was said and the wisdom it now reflects.
It is a big "If only they had" done so.
To say otherwise is being dishonest. One is only stating the obvious solution given in that talk, as being a logical and viable solution.
Regards Tony
This is wrong. The people flocked to Jesus because he was a healer. He healed the lowest and the most neglected. and then he preached to them in words that have forever changed the course of history. That have never been surpassed.Remember the response to the Message of Jesus (All Messengers), who gives a hoot about those that rejected at that time the essence of the Messages they gave?
Still not addressing what was offered, as good advice, or not good advice that would solve many issues we face in this age.Are you saying I'm dishonest for stating my sincerely held belief that accusing a people of propheticide who in most cases certainly had nothing to do with it and in the remaining few cases it is unlikely they had anything to do with it is unwise?
That is a dishonest statement, I know that, because I know with that statement, you know nothing of either the Bab of Baha’u’llah's life.No comparison with Baha'u'llah
Please correct me if I'm wrong: the good advice is that Jews should accept Jesus and Christians should accept Muhammad (pbuh). Does that mean that Jews should become Christians, and Christians should become Muslims? They should all merge into Shia Islam and then all merge with the Baha'i, as informing and updating all the others?Still not addressing what was offered, as good advice, or not good advice that would solve many issues we face in this age.
Thanks. I would like to know what the Qur'an says about the literal resurrection of the dead on the last day to judgement either to heaven or hell.If you have specific points, I will try google the Quran passages for you
I do not think that Abdu'l-Baha was pronouncing on this issue. He was only referring to the Jews who persecuted Jesus in the past.This is the very attitude that has led to the persecution of Jews by "Christians" down two thousand years. Abdul Baha has no authority to pronounce on the issue, beyond his own conditioning.
Jesus does not meet those requirements so the Jews are right to reject Jesus as the messiah they have been waiting for.The Jews do not accept Jesus as the messiah because Jesus does not meet the requirements of the Jewish warrior messiah come to save the Jewish people alone. It would be against their religion to accept Jesus as the messiah, whatever Christians like to believe. (To the best of my knowledge and open to correction)
According to Abdu'l-Baha Jesus was the messiah, so that is what Baha'is believe. However, Jesus was never slated to be the Promised One who would come in the latter days. That would be impossible because Jesus never promised to return to earth, not even once in the New Testament. Rather, Jesus said that His work was finished here, He was no more in the world, and that His kingdom was not of this world. (John 14:19, John 17:11, John 17:4, John 19:30, John 18:36, John 18:37)Is Jesus the messiah? Christians believe so, but that he came as the suffering servant, rather than the warrior hero, and that he came for all humanity, rather than for the Jews alone.
Jesus did come to restore and refresh the law of Moses, but that does not make Jesus the Jewish messiah.Muslims believe that Jesus is the Jewish messiah. They believe that Jesus came to restore and refresh the law of Moses.
I never said that I believe all the messengers are 'anointed' by the Holy Spirit, Tony said that.The rest of your post really confuses me. I know Baha'i believe that the Holy Spirit (of God) does not enter the messenger, but is reflected by the messenger. But they do believe the messenger is 'anointed' by the Holy Spirit.
I believe that refers to Jesus and only Jesus.The meaning of the Christ or the Messiah is really 'the anointed one'.
The suggestion by Abdul'baha was not asking people to change their faith, but to accept the divine origin of the Tanakh Prophets and both Jesus and Muhammad.Please correct me if I'm wrong: the good advice is that Jews should accept Jesus and Christians should accept Muhammad (pbuh). Does that mean that Jews should become Christians, and Christians should become Muslims? It should all merge into one Abrahamic faith, and then further merge with the Baha'i, as informing and updating all the others?
If that is not what Abdul Baha suggests, is it possible to explain?
No, but that does not make Jesus "better" than Baha'u'llah.No comparison with Baha'u'llah
I know and they need to be given power to enforce the international laws.
Regards Tony
You sound angry, and have provides a reply in that light.Spoken like a true proselytising enforcer.
Do you honestly believe that changing one's faith to accept faith in the divine origins of Jesus and Muhammad is not asking people to change their faith?The suggestion by Abdul'baha was not asking people to change their faith, but to accept the divine origin of the Tanakh Prophets and both Jesus and Muhammad.
Even the Pope can do that.
Regards Tony
Knowing what you as Baha'is know, if you were transported back in time, what would you tell the Jews?
"Yes, believe everything that the Christians are telling you. It is sure guidance from God."
Except all we know about what Jesus said is in the NT. Which Baha'is say if followed literally is misguidance.
The question was... If you went back in time. By using Baha'i beliefs, there is no way a Jew should accept a religion that teaches its prophet is God. Plus, it was early on when Paul made following the Law unnecessary. The Law which the Jewish Bible says pretty much that they are to keep it forever.Abdu'l-Baha told them what they needed to know, is there any doubt about that wisdom now?
And if applied to Paul's writings and other things written in the NT, would some of the things that Christians believe and teach hold up?Verses such as these can guide us.
1 Thessalonians 5:21 "Test all things; hold fast to that which is good".
And you don't think the Ahmadiyyas and Scientologists teach the virtues?Virtues and morality, being kind hearted, compassionate and forgiving are all good.
Those are the teachings that bind us
Unfortunately, "teaching" the Faith is part of what is expected of a Baha'i.Why not instead: You are welcome to your beliefs, but don't try to change mine to conform to yours
Then the people of the world would get on with their own quiet faith, rather than proselytizing and judging and criticizing other religions.
Okay, step one... firmly establish the unity of all people the world over. That's a huge first step. What are the baby steps that we need to take first?The well-being of mankind, its peace and security, are unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established. This unity can never be achieved so long as the counsels which the Pen of the Most High hath revealed are suffered to pass unheeded. Baha'u'llah.
The world will not change with those type of comments, thus those comments just add to the conflict the world now faces.Spoken like a true proselytising enforcer.
It would be up to the conscience of all people to make a choice, I cannot answer for them.Do you honestly believe that changing one's faith to accept faith in the divine origins of Jesus and Muhammad is not asking people to change their faith?
Look at the steps Tony.
Step1 No faith in divine origins of Jesus and Muhammad
Step2 Faith in divine origins of Jesus and Muhammad.
How does that not constitute a change of faith?
Do you think no one was doing that from the Baha'i back then? Some of them were Saint's and Hands of the Cause, what could I say that they did not say, what Abdul'baha already offered, in the thousands of talks?The question was... If you went back in time. By using Baha'i beliefs, there is no way a Jew should accept a religion that teaches its prophet is God. Plus, it was early on when Paul made following the Law unnecessary. The Law which the Jewish Bible says pretty much that they are to keep it forever.