Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jesus is the same, but other Christians do have a different definition of Jesus, based on a different definition of God, in the error ridden King James, that's why these discussions go on for eternity, until they drop the error ridden King James, which the Book of Mormon does correct many passages in the King James, pointing out the errors.Can we please get back on topic? Take your off-topic comments elsewhere.
Watchmen, I am as yet, wanting to stay out of this thread since the “debate” section seems to engendure argument rather than progress in understanding a point of view they we not agree with. The emotions and motives underlying the debate threads are so often tainted by obstinance and pettiness that I RARELY see the point of becoming involved. I frankly can’t tell you why I responded to this one other than no one seemed to want to respond to the actual OP, (or perhaps no one had any response to the OP - I don’t know). If I can, can I simply talk about the Book of Mormon and Biblical Narratives from memory of it? If I get it wrong, let me know, I will slap myself and dig out a Bible and Book of Mormon (or other literature) at some point if I really need to....“If possible, could you throw in some verses from the Bible and Book of Mormon to demonstrate what you mean? I suspect the difference you allude to might exist because the Nephites had not yet heard the basic gospel from Christ himself. Thus, they weren't ready for the deeper truths you speak of that Christ shared in the 40 days literature. - watchmen, post #70
Jesus is the same, but other Christians do have a different definition of Jesus, based on a different definition of God in the error ridden King James, that's why these discussions go on for eternity, until they drop the error ridden King James, which the Book of Mormon does correct many passages in the King James, pointing out the errors.
Most LDS don't even realize that.
That's why Joseph Smith was told to join no other Christian religion, because they were using a faulty text, the KING JAMES.
Joseph Smith made that VERY CLEAR and poured over the KING JAMES and made all the necessary corrections, which are found in the LDS version of the KING JAMES, in the form of JST (Joseph Smith Translation) footnotes.
I don't understand your argument. None of the best Bible scholars uses the KJV as a standard, because we know it neither represents the earliest texts, nor the best translation sources.Jesus is the same (comma), people's messed up understanding of Jesus Christ and his gospel is different, due to errors in the King James.
Following a faulty King James text as a basis for any religion will give you just that a faulty error ridden religion.
There are three different basic types of people, Celestial, Terrestrial and Telestial.
Celestial ~ They accept Jesus Christ and the fullness of the Father (salvation and exaltation)
Terrestrial ~ They accept Jesus Christ but not the Father (salvation)
Telestial ~ They receive the Holy Ghost but not the Father or the Son
Outer Darkness ~ They deny the Holy Ghost
That's a basic outline and the reason we're different from other Christians. They have salvation but not exaltation, that's why they're so angry with us, their progression is limited to a Terrestrial state.
Let's lift them up to a higher level by being examples of Jesus Christ, by offering the fullness of his gospel in love.
Let's show them the fullness of the Father and his gospel in love.
We are called to do that, now and throughout eternity.
That's just not true. Many of us don't even use the KJV anymore.Jesus is the same, (comma) people's messed up understanding of Jesus Christ and his gospel is different, due to errors in the King James.
That's just not true. Many of us don't even use the KJV anymore.
A perfect example of errors based on the flawed King James. an example of a Christian believe and no doubt part of a particular Christian religion, based on a flawed and faulty text.I believe JESUS to be GOD in the flesh. The FATHER is the invisible personage and the HOLY SPIRIT is a motivating personage/force of GOD. Three contributing beings make up ONLY ONE GOD essence.
A perfect example of errors based on the flawed King James. Christian religions based on a flawed faulty text.
Jesus Christ is God the Son, having an immortal resurrected body
Our Eternal Father is God the Father, having an immortal resurrected body
The Holy Ghost is God the Father and God the Son's Spirit extended to men on earth
God the Father and God the Son have bodies of flesh and bone, they are immortal and perfect.
Then you use an equally or more flawed text.That's just not true. Many of us don't even use the KJV anymore.
We believe we have an Eternal Mother, the Mother of our spirits, yet we have no scripture written specifically about this, it's just understood that we do, since we have an Eternal Father of our spirits.I believe Katz posted someone that there is a mother God. Do you know what she meant by that in regards to offical LDS theology?
A perfect example of errors based on the flawed King James. an example of a Christian believe and no doubt part of a particular Christian religion, based on a flawed and faulty text.
Jesus Christ is God the Son, having an immortal resurrected body
Our Eternal Father is God the Father, having an immortal resurrected body
The Holy Ghost is God the Father and God the Son's Spirit extended to men on earth
God the Father and God the Son have bodies of flesh and bone, they are immortal and perfect.
Even today, "Nearly all travellers (tourists) arrive (in Bethlehem) via Jerusalem"Stay on target, folks.
Regarding differences between the BoM and Bible in their portrayal of Jesus, I think only two have been mentioned in this thread:
1. His birthplace (Jersalem vs. Bethlehem).
2. His demeanor (suffering in the NT vs. resurrected Jesus of the BoM).
Does anyone have another difference they'd like to discuss?
We believe we have an Eternal Mother, the mother of our spirits, yet we have no OFFICIAL scriptural doctrine concerning this, it's just understood that we do, since we have an Eternal Father of our spirits.
Again, a perfect example of a flawed scripture, mistranslated from the Greek text, thus misleading the reader slightly. The King James, is still the most correct text, other than the Joseph Smith Inspired Version. The King James has errors, but in this particular instance, it does not.New International Version based directly from the Greek.
John 6:46 No one has seen the FATHER except the one who is from GOD; only HE has seen the FATHER.
The FATHER has never been resurrected. ONLY JESUS was resurrected.
Again, a perfect example of a flawed scripture, mistranslated from the Greek text, not even CLOSE to the King James, which is the most correct text, besides the Joseph Smith Inspired Version. The King James has errors, but in this particular instance it does not.
John 6: 46 (King James)
Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.
Joseph Smith was of God, a godly man, and he DID see the Father and the Son.
John 6:46 (Joseph Smith Inspired Version)
Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.
Keep using a flawed text and you'll have a distorted view of Jesus Christ and the Father.
The Lord was chosen from the beginning, by our Eternal Father, who created his spirit body.Thanks for the information. Maybe that's another difference between the Jesus in the Book of Mormon, and the Jesus in the Bible. Jesus in the Bible only has an Eternal Father but no Eternal Mother.
Therefore, Jesus did not have an Eternal Mother because Jesus had no beginining. He is the Alpha and Omega according to the Holy Bible.