metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
I think it is wrong to force people to pay "healthcare" for others.
So, money is more important than human life? How does that fit into what Jesus taught?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think it is wrong to force people to pay "healthcare" for others.
By what I know, that is a false accusation.
Please give link to speech where he says those?
That is interesting accusation. So, then Trump would have to be a socialist, they are the most self-centered and don't care about others. Would be nice to know why they say so, because by Trump's actions I don't think that is true, at least not more than in any other person.
If both are against freedom of speech, maybe best choice it to vote for Kennedy.
So, money is more important than human life? How does that fit into what Jesus taught?
Jesus was an observant Second Temple Jew. He taught the Jews to obey the Torah. Part of the Torah is TZEDAKAH, which is usually translated as charity, but some translate it as social justice. The Torah teaches a shlew of things, commandments meant to assist the poor. For example, anyone an enter an orchard or field, and eat to they are satisfied, and it is not theft. With regards to Tzedakah, Jews are to give ten percent. It is not a voluntary thing as in Christianity -- it was an obligation.What did Jesus say about forcing others to pay for what you want?
With regards to Tzedakah, Jews are to give ten percent. It is not a voluntary thing as in Christianity -- it was an obligation.
If religion could make such a poor person give everything she had (to the temple, note), then religion is evil.And in the Parable of the Widows Mite, Jesus praises the widow for going beyond the necessity of the Law with her charitable giving, thus not taking a position that the Law was unnecessary.
It doesn't translate into "everything", plus it's a parable.If religion could make such a poor person give everything she had (to the temple, note), then religion is evil.
It is NOT a parable. Luke alleges it to have happened. Luke 21:1-4It doesn't translate into "everything", plus it's a parable.
Generally speaking, theologically it's considered to be a parable, which doesn't necessarily mean that it did or did not actually happen. It's the moral of the story that's most important as the early church had decided about Jesus' parables.It is NOT a parable. Luke alleges it to have happened. Luke 21:1-4
And v4?
- NKJV: put in all the livelihood that she had.
- NIV: put in all she had to live on
- ESV: put in all she had to live on
- NASB: put in all that she had to live on.
- KJV: hath cast in all the living that she had.
OJ Simpson was also found NOT guilty by a jury. Does that mean he didn't murder anyone?
The Central Park 5, convicted of killing a jogger in Central Park. Oh, but then it's INjustice when a jury convicts.
Democrat double-standards.
I guess you're unable/unwilling to admit that juries often do get it wrong. Your resorting to personal insults in classic liberal diversion when you know you've lost the debate.I won't play your game. Trump was convicted of 34 felonies by jurors who were approved by his lawyers.
O J Simpson and the "Central Park 5" are unrelated cases.
Your absurd comment about Democrat double-standards shows that you are part of the Trump cult. (And I mean exactly that!)
Why and what?Freedom of speech has some limitations by necessity, especially when it involves human life.
No, human rights and freedom are more important than submitting to quacks. In any case, I think people should be free to help others, if they want, not forced to do so, especially when the "help" is not necessary good. When people have the right to decide by themselves, they can have some control over is the money used in a good way.So, money is more important than human life?
By what I see, they were separated usually from the human traffickers ("guardians"). And also, it is their own choice, if they want to be with their family, they could have stayed in home country. That is why I think it is wrong to accuse Trump for the separation, especially when there is also a legal way to get into U.S., with whole family.You must have ignored 7th grade science class. Not my problem. And you don't rebut what I stated about the right wing distorting words and meanings.
OMG, really? I guess right wing disinformation media didn't cover it.
Trump administration family separation policy - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A Timeline of the Trump Administration's Family Separation Policy - American Oversight
An extensive timeline of the administration’s communications about family separation, including its public statements about the policy, internal discussions we uncovered through FOIA, public reporting, and agency investigations.www.americanoversight.org
Settlement over Trump-era family separations at the border limits future separations for 8 years
The agreement announced Monday also provides families that were split under the Trump administration with temporary legal status and short-term housing aid.www.pbs.org
No, I was just pointing out that how can you call life in U.S. better, when many of the people stand it only with drugs like fentanyl. If it would be a good place, there would be not fentanyl crisis.So are you accusing all migrants of being involved with drugs?
How is forcing others to pay loving one another? I think it is utterly evil. Obviously it is nice, if people help others, but forcing people to be essentially slaves for others is wrong. It is ultra selfish and greedy to force others to pay.So you reject Jesus' teching to love one another. So someone taught you to be greedy, selfish, and live by "screw thy neightbor".
From far left everything looks far right. But, it is better to be far right than far wrong.You're far right.
That was the justification the Trump administration gave, but investigations found this to be untrue. Children were taken from migrant families, and they were given to many unknown people. The Biden administration has been working to find the kidnapved children and reunite them with their families, but they haven't been about to find about 5-600 children, mostly due to bad record keeping by Trump's crew.By what I see, they were separated usually from the human traffickers ("guardians").
So you are saying that the migrants shouldn't have trusted Trump and his administration. How would they have been informed of the threat to their children and families? Many migrants have no access to media until the enter the USA and seek asylum. Then it's too late.And also, it is their own choice, if they want to be with their family, they could have stayed in home country. That is why I think it is wrong to accuse Trump for the separation, especially when there is also a legal way to get into U.S., with whole family.
If drug use is so prevalent then we need better mental healthcare access. Of course since our healthcare system is for-profit and mental healthcare is expensive, most citizens are on their own, and illegal drugs cheaper than medical care. Conservatives help create that system where drug use is the cheaper option.No, I was just pointing out that how can you call life in U.S. better, when many of the people stand it only with drugs like fentanyl. If it would be a good place, there would be not fentanyl crisis.
So you think it is evil that sharing resources in society that teaches children, has police and fire departments, paves roads, has sewers, offers transportation, and can help starving families make ends meet? Feel free to point out the evil.How is forcing others to pay loving one another? I think it is utterly evil. Obviously it is nice, if people help others, but forcing people to be essentially slaves for others is wrong. It is ultra selfish and greedy to force others to pay.
No, far right, and ordinary right, is quite anti-Christ these days. Leave it to liberals to extend the moral decency that conservatives are unwilling to allow in their thinking and feeling.From far left everything looks far right. But, it is better to be far right than far wrong.
There is the ethical right, and the unethical right. the far right is definately unethical and immoral, namely as MAGAs. The ethical right are those rare, old school republicans like Romney, Liz Cheney, among a few others like any Never Trumper. The moral decline of republicans is due to Trump, but also the citizens whose feelings have been manipulated by Trump and other opportunists. The right is essentially a toxic, co-dependent coalition of voters and leaders who are their own worst enemy. The solution will be if Biden can win, and the democrats take the House and Senate, and then republicans will be a chaotic and irrelevant mess that needs to face facts that they are not attractive to the majority of citizens.I would like to know, what does "right" mean to you?
I guess you're unable/unwilling to admit that juries get it right most of the time. You're resorting to personal insults in classic cultist diversion when you know you've lost the debate.I guess you're unable/unwilling to admit that juries often do get it wrong. Your resorting to personal insults in classic liberal diversion when you know you've lost the debate.
Run! Run away!I guess you're unable/unwilling to admit that juries get it right most of the time. You're resorting to personal insults in classic cultist diversion when you know you've lost the debate.
What is it about the American system of justice, based on arguments from both the prosecution and the defense, resulting in a decision -- in this case, 34 felonies, committed during the final days of a presidential campaign in a blatant attempt to hide the information and skew the election -- that you can't understand. He really has you brainwashed, doesn't he?
I'm putting you on "ignore", as I will only debate with rational people, not cultists.
I guess you're unable/unwilling to admit that juries often do get it wrong. Your resorting to personal insults in classic liberal diversion when you know you've lost the debate.
I don't know anything about a paper trail. An appeal wouldn't work if that were the case. And the jury in their deliberations did not ask for paper but for witness statements which indicates they didn't have enough on paper.That ignores the paper trail that shows Trump was manipulating and misrepresenting his payments to a prostitute. They were definitely the "smoking gun" in this case.