sassysam29
Member
"Proof of importance" yes?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Proof of importance " yes?I totally agree. It's just an interesting thought.
Evidence changes my evaluation of any claim, proposition, or assertion.If I get you evidence will this change anything?
I'm skeptical of everything, alas, but as much as possible I remain open to anything.With all what you studied you are still very skeptic at the end.
I lack faith. Evidence is all I can use.will evidence be of use?
I asked for the Arabic, but I am willing to deal with a translation of the passage concerned, so long as you present an argument for why this matters or indicates anything scientific (or is supposed to).What about surat "Al Hadid" Iron.. when he says that he sent down Iron? Still this is meaningless to you?
The word "religion" (and related words in French, German, Italian, even non-IE languages that have been sufficiently influenced by Western culture) refers to a fairly modern concept. The ideas that religions concern beliefs, doctrines, or are independent from other sociocultural norms rather than sociocultural practices as they were for thousands of years (and continue to be in some cases) is a modern notion. Hence the lack of a word for religion in ancient languages and the social construction of "religions" (both ancient and modern) out of the modern notion whence there were originally none (for example, the 19th century religionization of Greek and Roman "myths" using Homer, Hesiod, Euripides, even Ovid, or the modern (re-)construction of Hinduism and Buddhism into modern "-isms" through (in the case of Hinduism) several centuries of a diverse number of factors mostly related to colonialization).Did you study other religions as well?
There are reasons. Most simply, I haven't found sufficient evidence to believe in God or any given religion given the evidence against these.Is there another reason why you reject God and religion?
That makes two of us.I hope one day you experience it.
Salam Alikom friend..you have been through many studies as I can see.. you are very vey intelectual, learned and educated.. being skeptic is a good thing BUT to an extent.. if it goes beyond it can result in the opposite of what it was designed for.. I am not as learned as you are regarding religions or whatever you want to call them but I found all I needed in Islam. I am not calling you to Islam this is just a mature conversation where I can learn from you and share an experience with you. For me Judiasm, Christianity and Islam are from God and I believe so although the 1st 2 have been abreviated and changed while the 3rd did not. I believe also that they are some how confirming each other. For me also studing about Prophet Muhammad made all the sense because he was illeterate in an area of illeterate people and there was no source or civilization where he can get all the kind of information about everything as an illeterate or even as a learned man and knowing all he has put in Quran with all the precision and accuracy does not fit an illeterate or a human being at all which was enough evidence for me to really accept Islam the 2nd time by choice and not by birth. He could have also said that Jesus is son of God and this would have helped a lot with Christians. He was also offered all a man could wish for, wealth, women, estates and the leadership of Mekka to stop his call to this religion and his answer was if you put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left to leave this I would die first and not do it. He could have had all he needed but he refused. He also died very poor and had little food at home always and when he died his shield was mortagated at a jewish guys shop. For me with all the legislations and all that I found in Quran this was enough. There is no contradiction in Quran and I challenge any one to get me one vs. the bible for example which is full of those. Also all what he taught people through Quran and through his morals fitted for me the example of a prophet. he gave rights and respect to women when they were down graded to the extent that they were part of the inheritence form a dead father or uncle. They were like inheriting the house. They even have more rights than European women to the contrary to what is thought. Also at that time that society had very perverted sexual habbits that came to stop, he was kind to kids, animal and plants and when sending an army to war he advised them with the most beautiful commands: not to burn at tree or kill old people women or childern, not to destroy a house of worship or attack civilians, not raid houses or terrify people.....etc.. He brought equality and gave the black people the same right in a very racist society and encouraged people to free the slaves, he prevented drinking wine gradually (some people might consider this not acceptable because they like it but it makes more problems left permitted it is prohibited in the old testiment too) he prevented eating pork (because they eat garbage and dead animals) which is also in the old testiment, he gave great advise, he was humble. .actually you have to read about him from a trusted source. You can also see a youtube video of "Garry miller converting to Islam". This was right before he announced he converted. In it he was talking about Muhammad. You can see that he was very shook up because he was a Christian missionarry who went in to read Quran to find falts and start debating Muslims. The result was that he converted.Evidence changes my evaluation of any claim, proposition, or assertion.
I'm skeptical of everything, alas, but as much as possible I remain open to anything.
I lack faith. Evidence is all I can use.
I asked for the Arabic, but I am willing to deal with a translation of the passage concerned, so long as you present an argument for why this matters or indicates anything scientific (or is supposed to).
The word "religion" (and related words in French, German, Italian, even non-IE languages that have been sufficiently influenced by Western culture) refers to a fairly modern concept. The ideas that religions concern beliefs, doctrines, or are independent from other sociocultural norms rather than sociocultural practices as they were for thousands of years (and continue to be in some cases) is a modern notion. Hence the lack of a word for religion in ancient languages and the social construction of "religions" (both ancient and modern) out of the modern notion whence there were originally none (for example, the 19th century religionization of Greek and Roman "myths" using Homer, Hesiod, Euripides, even Ovid, or the modern (re-)construction of Hinduism and Buddhism into modern "-isms" through (in the case of Hinduism) several centuries of a diverse number of factors mostly related to colonialization).
For simplicity, I've studied Wicca, Gnosticism (modern and ancient), Greek religions, Roman/Hellenistic religions, Islam, Shamanism (modern and to the extent possible ancient), the origins of religion, Hinduism, Buddhism (in its most popular forms, from the original schisms to Zen Buddhism), Neopaganism, Christianities (from the Jesus movement through the medieval Church and various cults, movements, and heresies), Druidism, Judaism (ancient, 2nd-temple, and Rabbinic Judaisms), Goddess worship, Zoroastrianism, and more (and, of course, what I have included/excluded as well as the categorizations of those included are somewhat arbitrary- that ancient Gnosticism existed has been questioned, Rabbinic Judaism of today isn't that reflected in the Mishnah, and the "-isms" attached to Buddhist and Hindu religious beliefs reflect a unified number of doctrines that isn't reflected in traditional forms of these religions, etc.).
There are reasons. Most simply, I haven't found sufficient evidence to believe in God or any given religion given the evidence against these.
That makes two of us.
. For me Judiasm, Christianity and Islam are from God and I believe so although the 1st 2 have been abreviated and changed while the 3rd did not.
. I believe also that they are some how confirming each other
For me also studing about Prophet Muhammad made all the sense because he was illeterate in an area of illeterate people and there was no source or civilization where he can get all the kind of information about everything as an illeterate or even as a learned man and knowing all he has put in Quran with all the precision and accuracy does not fit an illeterate or a human being at all which was enough evidence for me to really accept Islam the 2nd time by choice and not by birth
. Without spirituality you can never find God or peace...
God says
In the Quran it is mentioned that: We made mountains as wedges. It was discovered in the 20 century that the mountains look like wedges and are actually holding the crust of the earth. Sorry for writting this much but you are touching on very interesting and sensitive subject.
Here I will submit points to try to disprove the infallibility of the Bible primarily used by Christianity and it's contents, and I would like to see if my points can be countered.
Oral traditions could be passed on as easy as writing. One did no have to be literate to collect others writings and edit them for their own needs.
Some people could also recite the whole bible almost verbatim in oral traditions alone.
So his possible illiteracy means absolutely nothing as far as proof for any divine connection. It factually is not.
Point 1
If Yahweh demands that the punishment for Sin is Damnation/Eternal Death then why did he have to send himself in the form of a man to die in order to change forgive his believers?
Why could he not have said that all of those who follow the Jewish faith are now forgiven?
Point 2
If evil exist so that Yahweh could give humans free-will, and in heaven there is no evil, then that means there is no free-will in heaven.
If the absence of free-will is a good thing as heaven is clearly made out to be, then why would he make free-will in the first place.
Wa-‘alaykum ‘as-salaamSalam Alikom
My neurotic tendency to need to know as much as I can about everything is certainly not something I recommend.being skeptic is a good thing BUT to an extent
Apart from lesser known and perhaps more arguable examples, what about the Sunni/Shia divide?For me Judaism, Christianity and Islam are from God and I believe so although the 1st 2 have been abbreviated and changed while the 3rd did not.
1) To the extent this describes Muhammad, it also describes Jesus (with some arguable minor differences that, I think, are less important than the problems with the above assertion)For me also studding about Prophet Muhammad made all the sense because he was illiterate in an area of illiterate people and there was no source or civilization where he can get all the kind of information about everything as an illiterate or even as a learned man
Thank you.Here I would only like to share the beauty I found in Islam with whomever cares to know without wasting our best resources which is time.
I am not. I am sincerely looking for truth and answers, but I do not think these are to be found in Islam (or numerous other places, including many fields in the sciences). To make the leap of faith required to pray to Allah is more than I can do honestly.if you are sincerely looking for him and did pray to him saying for example
My field is neuroscience. While that doesn't mean I can tell you exactly how the mind emerges from the brain (or doesn't, for that matter), I know how the brain works, and the physical descriptions you refer to involve the brain. And to the extent you are correct about the nature of the brain's response to stresses, how is it not possible or more probable that religious ecstasy, revelation, or epiphany (in the classical sense; literally) isn't due to hallucinations and other responses to stress?let me also tell you about a mind
Arguing that someone who relies on logic, rationality, etc., should not is as effective as arguing that someone who believes logic & rationality are inherently limited are wrong. In both cases, the initial perspective precludes the acceptance of the opposing perspective.Counting on the mind alone is a big mistake that so many do nowadays.
Iron is at the core of this planet. I think you are referring to the fact that meteorites contain iron, not that this is the source of the Earth's iron.as you might know it was discovered that Iron was not made on earth and that it came with Meteors to earth over a long period.
And Arabic nouns have gender. Also, male spiders do build webs, although you are right that "species-typical" webs are constructed by females.Female spider builds a web
This isn't a statement about a scientific truth hidden in the Quran but an explanation as to why the Quran isn't inaccurate by explaining the blatantly obvious (i.e., that a pregnant woman's body contains 2 hearts). Even if the verse is meant to be interpreted this way, it is an obvious truth known long before the Quran.Because the Quran is very precise there a verse that says that God has not created 2 hearts inside one man and it was strange to many why not say human or mention both man and woman and the answer was that at some point in her life a woman has 2 hearts inside her when she is pregnant.
Humans have known how mountains look since they first saw mountains. This wasn't a 20th century discovery (and mountains don't hold the crust of the Earth).It was discovered in the 20 century that the mountains look like wedges and are actually holding the crust of the earth.
. those who miss the call don't know they missed it so they go blissfully on unaware
You might not realise this, Seeker of Ka, but angels in Heaven DO possess the freedom of will. How do you think Lucifer had even rebelled against God? He had made a choice.
You have to go back to the Hebrew Bible to make sense out of the sacrifice. In those days, the Ancient Israelites had to atone for their sins by offering as a sacrifice an unblemished animal. When you get to the NT, God decides to perform an atoning sacrifice which once and for all would be sufficient to pay the price for sins of the whole world. This is why Yeshua (Jesus) is called the ‘Lamb of God ’. Unfortunately, he had naysayers, people who doubted him and had refused to believe. That's because they didn't really know who he was. If they really knew, they probably would've believed. Jesus said, “For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only begotten Son, tha whosoever believeth in him will not perish, but have everlasting life.” That's a universal offer, now that it has been finished. Of course, some people know and believe, others know and do not believe. Still some don't know at all.
Well, Seeker of Ka, as I aforementioned, before Jesus had lived, unblemished animal sacrifice was how the Israelites atoned for sins, and God had forgiven them. Now that Jesus had been crucified and was resurrected, God extended the offer of salvation to everyone, Jew and Gentile. Though, in Yeshua's day, as is true today, Jews generally consider faith in Yeshua to be apostasy. Not to say that there aren't Jewish believers in Yeshua....