• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do Christians really overly persecute homosexuals?

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
Speaking in a general sense again? Are you going to once agian plead your special case and pretend like you didn't say what you just said?
Why would I pretend I didn't say that? Right now, it is only a minority of homosexuals, specifically on this forum, who have been labeling those who don't completely agree with them as bigots.

It would be senseless for me to be referring to anyone accept those people in this thread who are calling anyone who disagrees a bigot. But go ahead, make this into something it's not.
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
Im discouraging ANY public displays of indecency. I mean cmon have allitle tact, put some clothes on and keep it at home. Fear of being seen in public has turned into a aphrodesiac, and I wonder why. Not only are people doing it but others are looking for it. Just like strip clubs people will do it because its available and all it takes is your time/money. The morales slowly follow into this spiral.
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
You have no idea what pride parades are about or for and I'm guessing the image you get in your head is a bunch of muscly men wearing speedos spanking each other on penis floats.

Look: you are told from the day that you realize who you are that it is wrong to be yourself, even just holding the hands of the person you love in public is deemed immoral. It's not about sex it's about shattering the so called "traditional normal" concepts that society wants to box everyone into.

Sure some of the pride parades do get a bit out of hand because they are about celebrating SEXUALITY (not sex) but so do straight parades and no one bats an eye at that.
Oh your right sexuality has NOTHING to do with sex. So we should have beastiality parades as well so people are aware of their fealings in life. How can we be human if we dont encourage people to follow their sex drive rather then rational thought. Our children need to know that you too can sleep with animals with free right, and regardless of what people tell you "you were born this way" and you need to embrace this. My hats off to you sir, for showing me the error of my ways.
 

no-body

Well-Known Member
Oh your right sexuality has NOTHING to do with sex. So we should have beastiality parades as well so people are aware of their fealings in life. How can we be human if we dont encourage people to follow their sex drive rather then rational thought. Our children need to know that you too can sleep with animals with free right, and regardless of what people tell you "you were born this way" and you need to embrace this. My hats off to you sir, for showing me the error of my ways.

That you compare homosexuality to having sex with animals shows why homosexuals need pride parades in the first place.
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
Find me one Viagra commercial that features a homosexual couple.
Show me one Viagra comercial that says "for heterosexuals only, does not work on gay men" Now to prove your point that your failing at yes things like "Hooters" are everywhere and im saying its as bad on both sides.
 

Jeremiah

Well-Known Member
Why would I pretend I didn't say that? Right now, it is only a minority of homosexuals, specifically on this forum, who have been labeling those who don't completely agree with them as bigots.

It would be senseless for me to be referring to anyone accept those people in this thread who are calling anyone who disagrees a bigot. But go ahead, make this into something it's not.


"But go ahead, make this into something it's not."


O no, that is fine, beside, you certainty already beat me to that.
 

Jeremiah

Well-Known Member
Show me one Viagra comercial that says "for heterosexuals only, does not work on gay men" Now to prove your point that your failing at yes things like "Hooters" are everywhere and im saying its as bad on both sides.

"Show me one Viagra comercial that says "for heterosexuals only, does not work on gay men"


Show me a Viagra commercial where the focus is man on man action on instead of man on women.
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
That you compare homosexuality to having sex with animals shows why homosexuals need pride parades in the first place.
Wasnt the goal to show your love for eachother is equal? From what I hear ostriches are VERY willing, are you saying it isnt loved both ways? The comparison was acceptance of sexual preferance... Your preffer men the other preffer animals, both mates are willing participents. Your right to be sexual with what you choose and not what people say is normal... The problem with gays being in the closet is they are hiding from a part of themselves that should be opened right? How does this NOT transfer?
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
"Show me one Viagra comercial that says "for heterosexuals only, does not work on gay men"

Show me a Viagra commercial where the focus is man on man action on instead of man on women.
I allready changed this point into something that does make sense. "Hooters" and I agreed its in our faces....
 

Jeremiah

Well-Known Member
Wasnt the goal to show your love for eachother is equal? From what I hear ostriches are VERY willing, are you saying it isnt loved both ways? The comparison was acceptance of sexual preferance... Your preffer men the other preffer animals, both mates are willing participents. Your right to be sexual with what you choose and not what people say is normal... The problem with gays being in the closet is they are hiding from a part of themselves that should be opened right? How does this NOT transfer?

"I hear ostriches are VERY willing,"


And I hear spelling and grammar checkers are VERY EASY TO USE.
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
Lets change the focus of this sexual release. There are people that "love" trees, and I dont mean in a "I wanna hug you" kind of way. The trees have no say, no memory, nothing to refute this sexual transfer. I would not condemn that person doing this to trees, but would I support it? I would be supporting them to never find a person they can create life with, and that would be a loss.
 

no-body

Well-Known Member
Wasnt the goal to show your love for eachother is equal? From what I hear ostriches are VERY willing, are you saying it isnt loved both ways? The comparison was acceptance of sexual preferance... Your preffer men the other preffer animals, both mates are willing participents. Your right to be sexual with what you choose and not what people say is normal... The problem with gays being in the closet is they are hiding from a part of themselves that should be opened right? How does this NOT transfer?

An animal cannot give consent no matter how into it it appears to be.

I'm surprised you haven't compared it to pedophilia yet, that's par for the course with bigot logic.

Remember it was once thought that all black people had the mentality of children too it was backed up by scientists and the religious just like today. It's OK though, your kind doesn't really know any better.

But keep on telling us how many black... err I mean homosexual friends you have, and how this exempts you from bigotry because we all need a good laugh.
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
OK, I haven't read the thread, but the title alone is bugging me.

The use of "overly" implies that some persecution is acceptable.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
So is it coming down to the idea that you've undergone more, so you can define what a bigot is? Honestly, I don't see how you get off even trying to belittle the hatred or even mistreatment of another simply because you've supposedly gone through more.

As you said, you are who you are. But you're not even accepting that.

bigotry is intolerance which is a refusal to accept differences thru injustices, unfairness and discrimination.

"I do not condone their behavior" is the unwillingness to reason with someone’s inalienable incontrovertible right to be who they are
it's like saying
I do not accept, allow, grant their right to breathe

yes, you are prejudice... you can always change your mind
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
An animal cannot give consent no matter how into it it appears to be.

I'm surprised you haven't compared it to pedophilia yet, that's par for the course with bigot logic.

Remember it was once thought that all black people had the mentality of children too it was backed up by scientists and the religious just like today. It's OK though, your kind doesn't really know any better.

But keep on telling us how many black... err I mean homosexual friends you have, and how this exempts you from bigotry because we all need a good laugh
I very easily could as the men say the love is both ways. Countries with legal age limits of 12 do that every day. This didnt cross-over to the tree lovers BTW. The defense is sexual prefferance, your denying there is any other then same sex or oppisate sex targets allways involved.
 

it's_sam

Freak of Nature
OK, I haven't read the thread, but the title alone is bugging me.

The use of "overly" implies that some persecution is acceptable.
Good point storm HAHA, and again I dont think prosecution is needed. However I do think discretion can go a long way.
 

no-body

Well-Known Member
I very easily could as the men say the love is both ways. Countries with legal age limits of 12 do that every day. This didnt cross-over to the tree lovers BTW. The defense is sexual prefferance, your denying there is any other then same sex or oppisate sex targets allways involved.

Yes I get it you want to live in a sexual repressed prudish society and you use homosexuality as a springboard to air your grievances about that. Which is just as sick as outright hating homosexuals since you are minimizing their struggle.

You can always move to the middle east and see your preferred society made a reality.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Lets change the focus of this sexual release. There are people that "love" trees, and I dont mean in a "I wanna hug you" kind of way. The trees have no say, no memory, nothing to refute this sexual transfer. I would not condemn that person doing this to trees, but would I support it? I would be supporting them to never find a person they can create life with, and that would be a loss.

This is getting ridiculous.
 
Top