• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do disagreements between Baha'is have any significance for anyone else?

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
The Work available online explains all this - The Kitáb-i-Aqdas | Bahá’í Reference Library
The above explains all about how it was written and how it was compiled.
The Above is the Main Text Revealed by Baha'u'llah about 20 years after His Declaration. It is not the only source to all the Laws of this Dispensation.
The above is supplementary text that is attached to the Main Book. Baha'u'llah answered questions about the laws in many other tablets.

Regards Tony
Why couldn't Bahaullah write one compact/handy book having everything needed with reasons given, and this Aqdas Book had to be compiled by his followers for Law to make it convenient for them?
and then:
as afterthoughts. Please

Regards
____________
[41:3]
This is a revelation from the Gracious, the Merciful.
[41:4]
A Book, the verses of which have been expounded in detail — the Qur’an in clear, eloquent language — for a people who have knowledge,
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 41: Ha Mim Al-Sajdah
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
This fulfilled Prophecy both Biblical and from Islamic Tradition.

John 16:12 "I still have much to tell you, but you cannot yet bear to hear it. 13However, when the Spirit of truth comes, He will guide you into all truth. For He will not speak on His own, but He will speak what He hears, and He will declare to you what is to come. 14He will glorify Me by taking from what is Mine and disclosing it to you.…"

The Muslim tradition is - "Every knowledge hath seventy meanings, of which one only is known amongst the people. And when the Qá'im shall arise, He shall reveal unto men all that which remaineth."

I do not have the source for that at the moment.

Baha'u'llah has said;

"By God! however great Our desire to be brief, yet We feel We cannot restrain Our pen. Notwithstanding all that We have mentioned, how innumerable are the pearls which have remained unpierced in the shell of Our heart! How many the huris of inner meaning that are as yet concealed within the chambers of divine wisdom! None hath yet approached them; -- huris, 'whom no man nor spirit hath touched before.'" (Baha'u'llah, The Kitab-i-Iqan, p. 70)

And it is Allah that has unrestrained the pen;

"O Maid of inner meanings! Step out of the chamber of utterance by the leave of God, the Lord of the heavens and the earth." (The Summons of the Lord of Hosts, p. 13, paragraph 22)

Regards Tony

"The Muslim tradition is - "Every knowledge hath seventy meanings, of which one only is known amongst the people. And when the Qá'im shall arise, He shall reveal unto men all that which remaineth." Unquote.
Sorry, please.
There is no such prophecy in Quran- the first and the foremost source of guidance for Muslims.

Regards
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
Why couldn't Bahaullah write one compact/handy book having everything needed with reasons given, and this Aqdas Book had to be compiled by his followers for Law to make it convenient for them?
and then:
as afterthoughts. Please

Regards
____________
[41:3]
This is a revelation from the Gracious, the Merciful.
[41:4]
A Book, the verses of which have been expounded in detail — the Qur’an in clear, eloquent language — for a people who have knowledge,
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 41: Ha Mim Al-Sajdah

Personally I really can not offer a knowledgeable reply, sorry, as to me one would have to ask G_d that question, how can I know why G_d gives Wisdom, as G_d so chooses?

The first question I would ask is: "Are all the Laws of the Islamic Dispensation recorded in an easy to reference chronological order, or are they embedded in the text throughout the Quran and have to be compiled for easy reference?"

So if I was to contemplated an answer from such a finite mind, it would be because Baha'u'llah for the first time in religious history provided a written Covenant. In that covenant the interpretation of what Baha'u'llah offered could be explained by Abdul'baha and then Shoghi Effendi, to which they have done very well.

What is also important to know is, that Baha'u'llah gave a lot of this ability also to Abdul'baha. He instructed Abdul'baha to supply a lot of answers to the questions asked of Baha'u'llah and Abdul'baha also wrote tablets explaining the significance of the Message given by Baha'u'llah. All these works are part of the core Baha'i Teachings.

Regards Tony
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
"The Muslim tradition is - "Every knowledge hath seventy meanings, of which one only is known amongst the people. And when the Qá'im shall arise, He shall reveal unto men all that which remaineth." Unquote.
Sorry, please.
There is no such prophecy in Quran- the first and the foremost source of guidance for Muslims.

Regards

When Baha'u'llah wrote these Tablets the same thing was said by the divines of the day. What was found is that Baha'u'llah always quoted reliable sources and thus the argument that this is not a part of what Muhammad taught, was found to be flawed. If they used that argument, then they would have to discard many teachings that were born out of those same traditions.

There is also another tradition quoted;

"..Thus it is related in the “Biháru’l-Anvar,” the “Aválím,” and the “Yanbú’” of Ṣádiq, son of Muḥammad, that he spoke these words: “Knowledge is twenty and seven letters. All that the Prophets have revealed are two letters thereof. No man thus far hath known more than these two letters. But when the Qá’im shall arise, He will cause the remaining twenty and five letters to be made manifest.”

To source all these, one would need to speak the languages so searches could be done to find them.

There are many recorded Islamic Traditions about this.

Regards Tony
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
"this is your fallible human interpretation" Unquote.
Sorry, I don't agree with one.
The same is yours or for that matter of Bahaullah, all being humans.

Wasn't Bahaullah a human being like millions or billions who were born of their mothers and fathers and they died?
Yes, I am also fallible but the difference between me and you is that I know about my religion and why things were done as they were done with the Writings of Baha'u'llah. I do not speak about the Qur'an because I do not know much about it.

Baha'u'llah was a Manifestation of God so He was not an ordinary human. He had a human station and a divine station and in His divine station (when He spoke with the Voice of God) He was infallible, since God is infallible.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Conversion is usually a matter of more than a single post. I can show you plenty - including many of yours - that deal with people’s objections to the Baha’i faith.
It is my duty to correct misinformation about the Baha’i Faith and present correct information. This has nothing to do with conversion.
What percentage of your posts are aimed at getting someone to “move the needle” from “less Baha’i” to “more Baha’i?” Do you think it’s more or less than half?
The percentage is zero. I have zero interest in anyone moving their needle. Everyone has their own needle and it TOTALLY their own responsibility what they do with their needle.

I have no aims. I have said this repeatedly. The reason I post about Baha’i is because Baha’u’llah exhorted Baha’is to proclaim the Faith and teach it if people are interested in hearing more. That is all I do.
So when Baha’Is go through the motions of proselytizing, it’s accidental?
What motions are those that you think mean they have intent to convert? Why do you think that? How can you know that unless they tell you?
If “sharing and teaching” is how you describe the behaviour I’ve seen from yourself and other Baha’is, then I’d have to say that it’s just a euphemism for proselytizing.
No, sharing implies intent to share, teaching implies intent to teach, and proselytizing implies intent to convert. Why conflate the meanings of words?

Proselytizing is just a word that some people use to beat people over the head with. It has a specific meaning – convert or attempt to convert someone. Unless you know what someone is attempting to do (their intent) you cannot know they are proselytizing.

You are reading into behavior that you see but you have no way of knowing why they have the behavior. Maybe you are projecting because you cannot imagine why anyone would talk about a religion so much if they had no intent to convert. However, this is ludicrous. Do you think that all the Christians on this forum who talk about Christianity so much are proselytizing? If not, why single out the Baha’is?
That’s right. It’s suspicious in the first place that a god who’s capable of talking to whoever he pleases would ask for human beings to spread his message - i.e. proselytize - but if he did, then it stands to reason that he would have given you better material to work with. The vast majority of people who learn about the Baha’i faith don’t become Baha’i.
God does not talk to people. It does not matter of He is capable or not, the POINT is that people are not capable of understanding God directly, and that is why God sends Messengers as His Representatives. All this is completely logical, so it is difficult to understand why intelligent people cannot understand it. It is so simple a grade-schooler could understand it.

Here is the reason why the vast majority of people who learn about the Baha’i Faith don’t become Baha’is. It makes logical sense and is verifiable with data.

Matthew 7:13-14 “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.”

In every new age, the religion at the narrow gate is the new religion God wants us to find and follow, and it is the gate that leads to eternal life. But it is not that easy for most people to find this gate because most people are steeped in religious tradition or attached to what they already believe. If they do not have a religion, most people are suspicious of the new religion and the new messenger. If they are atheists they do not like the idea of messengers of God or they think they are all phonies.

Jesus told us to enter through the narrow gate, the gate that leads to eternal life, and He said few people would find that gate... It is narrow, so it is difficult to get through... It is difficult to get through because one has to be willing to give up all their preconceived ideas, have an open mind, and think for themselves. Most people do not normally embark upon such a journey. They go through the wide gate, the easy one to get through – their own religious tradition or their own preconceived ideas about God or no god. They follow that broad road that is easiest for them to travel. That is human nature.

Eventually it won’t matter how small the Baha’i Faith was in the beginning because in the distant future everyone will recognize Baha’u’llah and enter through the same gate, the gate that leads to life. However, those that enter now will have a huge reward after they die, because they made the effort to look for the narrow gate and they had the courage and common sense to walk through it, rather than following the crowd.
Sounds logically consistent.
No, it is insane. God is not going to take care of the teaching in due time. God does not come to earth and DO stuff. God gave humans free will so we can do stuff. Because we have free will we can choose whether to believe or not. Because we have free will we are all responsible for what we believe.

As far as progressing infinitely in the afterlife, that is true for some people, but nowhere do the Baha’i Writings say that every soul will progress, so if Baha’is use that as an reason not to “share” their Faith are just rationalizing, assuming everyone will just be fine after they die. The caveat is that whatever you end up after you die will be solely dependent upon the mercy of God and prayers of others on your behalf, as you will no longer have free will to advance your own condition. This is a well-known fact in the Baha’i Faith.

It also makes no logical sense that everyone will be fine after they die. Baha’u’llah would never have put so much emphasis on recognizing Him if it did not have repercussions in the afterlife. He was very clear on this matter, just as Jesus had been.

“The Book of God is wide open, and His Word is summoning mankind unto Him. No more than a mere handful, however, hath been found willing to cleave to His Cause, or to become the instruments for its promotion. These few have been endued with the Divine Elixir that can, alone, transmute into purest gold the dross of the world, and have been empowered to administer the infallible remedy for all the ills that afflict the children of men. No man can obtain everlasting life, unless he embraceth the truth of this inestimable, this wondrous, and sublime Revelation.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 183

“Incline your ears to the sweet melody of this Prisoner. Arise, and lift up your voices, that haply they that are fast asleep may be awakened. Say: O ye who are as dead! The Hand of Divine bounty proffereth unto you the Water of Life. Hasten and drink your fill. Whoso hath been re-born in this Day, shall never die; whoso remaineth dead, shall never live.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 213

What some Baha’is do is cherry pick passages but one has to look at ALL the passages in context and try to figure out what they mean. Unfortunately, most people don’t want to go to that much trouble. They are already confident of their own eternal destination, so why care about others? People either care about others as much or more than they care about themselves or not. This has nothing to do with religion but it is the whole ball of wax. Selfish people will go to hell no matter what they believed. There are going to be a lot of people waiting at the gate to heaven, wondering why they are not getting in. They thought belief was enough so they lived for self and the world. It is not as if both Jesus and Baha’u’llah did not give us fair warning or the importance of good works, not just for one’s immediate family.

“Thou hast asked Me concerning the nature of the soul. Know, verily, that the soul is a sign of God, a heavenly gem whose reality the most learned of men hath failed to grasp, and whose mystery no mind, however acute, can ever hope to unravel. It is the first among all created things to declare the excellence of its Creator, the first to recognize His glory, to cleave to His truth, and to bow down in adoration before Him. If it be faithful to God, it will reflect His light, and will, eventually, return unto Him. If it fail, however, in its allegiance to its Creator, it will become a victim to self and passion, and will, in the end, sink in their depths...” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 158-159

(Continued on next post...)
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
So your aim is to bring more people into the Baha’i faith.
No, if I have an aim, my aim is to bring more people to God and away from self because their eternal destiny depends upon that. If they die believing in God then they can come to believe in Baha’u’llah after they die. If they die disbelieving in God they will be lost and there is no guarantee they will ever find their way, and if they die hating God they will go to hell. I suppose this is why I post mostly to atheists rather than believers. I know many atheists who actually hate God and see no danger in this. I have lost track of most of them since I came to this forum but I occasionally read on those forums I was on... Nothing ever changes; they still hate God and blame Him for everything that is wrong in the world... All I can say is -- may God have mercy on their soul.
Or they just have faith and trust in God.
You could look at it that way except for what Baha’u’llah wrote, that God is not going to do our work for us. That is why He so clearly told us to do it. Unfortunately, most people prefer fun to work.
If the religion is true, God would find a way.
God is not going to do anything because (a) it does not matter to God if people accept the Baha’i Faith and because (b) God does not come to earth and do what He has enjoined humans to do, through Baha’u’llah, what humans are fully capable of doing. If they botch the job it will just take longer, bit it will get done eventually.

Take particular note of that last quote: He is Himself independent of, and transcendeth His creatures.” That means God does not NEED anyone’s belief.

“Consider the mercy of God and His gifts. He enjoineth upon you that which shall profit you, though He Himself can well dispense with all creatures.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 140


“Your Lord, the God of mercy, can well dispense with all creatures. Nothing whatever can either increase or diminish the things He doth possess. If ye believe, to your own behoof will ye believe; and if ye believe not, ye yourselves will suffer.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 148


“He who shall accept and believe, shall receive his reward; and he who shall turn away, shall receive none other than his own punishment.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 339


“Regard thou the one true God as One Who is apart from, and immeasurably exalted above, all created things. The whole universe reflecteth His glory, while He is Himself independent of, and transcendeth His creatures. This is the true meaning of Divine unity. He Who is the Eternal Truth is the one Power Who exerciseth undisputed sovereignty over the world of being, Whose image is reflected in the mirror of the entire creation. All existence is dependent upon Him, and from Him is derived the source of the sustenance of all things. This is what is meant by Divine unity; this is its fundamental principle.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 166
If there is a real urgency behind what you’re doing, then this points to your religion being false.
Why do you say that? How does that make the religion false?

What it says to me is that maybe Baha’is do not take it seriously enough. Then again, I have always been a very serious person even before I was doing Baha’i things. But most people still consider it their inherent right to have fun. That is part of the old world order that is crumbling, so Baha’is are still caught up in it, despite what Baha’u’llah clearly wrote. The fact that I do not get much acknowledgement of the quotes I post on Baha’i Forums is telling. People don’t want to hear that they are responsible to do something above and beyond the minimum.
I certainly agree that other religions proselytize. The Christians are just honest and up-front about it. They don’t try to hide the fact that they’re trying to bring people into their religion.
Well, maybe some Baha’is are trying to bring people into the Baha’i Faith, and maybe I was five years ago, but I am not now, because I know better, given I have read more about what Baha’u’llah wrote. It is only my responsibility to let people know about the Baha’i Faith but it is NOT my responsibility to bring them into the Baha’i Faith, not at all.
Your reaction says that you do care, and earlier in your post, you explained how you were trying to win converts: you said that you had to “spread the message” so that they “would stand a snowball’s chance in Hell of progressing.”
What reaction, being honest and saying I do not care what people think because I am only responsible for my own behavior?

I never said I was trying to “win converts” --- NEVER EVER. You take what I say and twist it to mean what you think I meant, maybe because that is what it would mean to you. But it does not mean that to me.

I do not care if people become Baha’is, but I care if they believe in God. However, that does not mean I am trying to make people believe in God. It means that I care about them and their eternal destination. You need to separate caring from converting.
I’ve heard a similar sentiment from many Christians: the reason they proselytize is that they believe Jesus commanded them to do it.
And so, what is wrong with sharing because that is what Jesus and Baha’u’llah exhorted us to do?
And you spoke to your end goal again: growing the Baha’i faith through conversion. This is a giveaway that we’re talking about proselytizing. I get that you don’t think your pitch will be successful most of the time, but this is true about most sales. A low success rate doesn’t mean that selling isn’t selling.

I am not trying to convert anyone to the Baha’i Faith. What about that do you understand? To keep insisting I am trying to convert people after I say I am not is akin to calling me a liar. Do you understand that is disrespectful?

No, I did not EVER speak of growing the Baha’i Faith through conversion as my end goal, not once... That is a complete distortion of everything I have EVER said. To the contrary, I have said about 100 times that the faith of no man can be conditioned by anyone except himself... That means that everyone has to CHOOSE what to believe and that means nobody should EVER be converted by anyone else. Baha’u’llah wrote that:

“Suffer not yourselves to be wrapt in the dense veils of your selfish desires, inasmuch as I have perfected in every one of you My creation, so that the excellence of My handiwork may be fully revealed unto men. It follows, therefore, that every man hath been, and will continue to be, able of himself to appreciate the Beauty of God, the Glorified. Had he not been endowed with such a capacity, how could he be called to account for his failure? If, in the Day when all the peoples of the earth will be gathered together, any man should, whilst standing in the presence of God, be asked: “Wherefore hast thou disbelieved in My Beauty and turned away from My Self,” and if such a man should reply and say: “Inasmuch as all men have erred, and none hath been found willing to turn his face to the Truth, I, too, following their example, have grievously failed to recognize the Beauty of the Eternal,” such a plea will, assuredly, be rejected. For the faith of no man can be conditioned by any one except himself. “
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 143
I’ve heard similar motivational statements in sales training: just keep pushing, even if you aren’t seeing results yet.
Again, you completely twist the meaning of everything I say putting own personal overlay on it. He did not mean stay there until you get some converts.... There are no sales in the Baha’i Faith.
Thank you for the sentiment, but you haven’t nipped anything in the bud. Explaining how you’re trying to grow your religion by finding converts did nothing to convince me that you aren’t proselytizing; just the opposite, in fact.
Not once did I ever say that I am trying to grow my religion by finding converts. Why can’t you just accept that? Do I tell you what your motives are on forums?

I explained my motives and the reasons for my motives and that is all I can do. When you continue to tell me that my motives are other than what I stated, you are calling me a liar or deceptive. I do not know why you cannot understand how disrespectful that is.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I don’t think this explanation makes sense, because there are other cases where people - with their egos - can agree on what a book says.
Show me one book where everyone agrees on everything that the book says. That could never happen unless everyone was a clone. It never happened because it is logically impossible.
Take Robert’s Rules of Order: I’ve seen plenty of occasions where people with big egos and competing interests get locked in disputes that hinge on exactly what Robert’s Rules of Order says, but they can almost universally agree on what the book actually says.
The same thing happens with Baha’is. We almost universally agree on the theology and teachings of the Baha’i Faith.
Regardless of ego, background, personal interests, etc., people who have actually read that book can actually agree on how to interpret its contents.

That’s my yardstick: a book written by human beings can be unambiguous to those who read it, as long as enough care and attention went into it. It seems to me that any god worth the title could do at least that well.
The thing is that God does not have it as His intention to be unambiguous.... Sorry God disappointed you. :(

But that does not mean that people who read it in an attempt to understand it cannot understand it. It just means that some will and some won’t. Also, there are degrees of understanding, so some will understand it better than others. No two people think alike because we all have a different childhood upbringing, heredity, education, and adult experiences. So for example some people might have difficulty understanding scriptures since they had no background in religion growing up.

Then there are people who have a certain bias that prevents them from understanding what they read on a page. That is like your bias about proselytizing. That misconception will never be removed unless you remove it yourself.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I am not trying to convert anyone to the Baha’i Faith. What about that do you understand? To keep insisting I am trying to convert people after I say I am not is akin to calling me a liar. Do you understand that is disrespectful?
I understand the implications of what I'm saying. I do realize that what I'm saying implies you aren't being honest.

Your offense at being called out doesn't make anything I've said false.
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
I understand the implications of what I'm saying. I do realize that what I'm saying implies you aren't being honest.
Do you consider cognitive dissonance a kind of dishonesty? I can see it possibly as a person being dishonest with himself. I know Trailblazer personally, and I think that she really thinks that she is not proselytizing, or trying to convert anyone.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I understand the implications of what I'm saying. I do realize that what I'm saying implies you aren't being honest.
HOW do you know my intentions better than I do? What gives you that capability? That is the hundred-dollar question.
Only God knows my intentions better than I do. Anyone who insists they KNOW the intentions of another person better than that person knows their own intentions is the epitome of arrogance.

66: O EMIGRANTS! The tongue I have designed for the mention of Me, defile it not with detraction. If the fire of self overcome you, remember your own faults and not the faults of My creatures, inasmuch as every one of you knoweth his own self better than he knoweth others. The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 45
Your offense at being called out doesn't make anything I've said false.
My offense at being called out does not make anything you say true.
The hundred-dollar question is why you insist on being right about another person's intentions.
I have no interest in knowing your intentions unless you tell me what they are, in which case I would believe you.

I do not care what you or anyone else thinks of me or my intentions because I know who I am. I have many faults but one of them is not that I am proselytizing and lying about it... :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Funny thing, I answer everything you ask me with an honest answer, but I predict you will not answer a thing I asked you above. You could prove me wrong though. ;)
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Do you consider cognitive dissonance a kind of dishonesty? I can see it possibly as a person being dishonest with himself. I know Trailblazer personally, and I think that she really thinks that she is not proselytizing, or trying to convert anyone.
I do not have cognitive dissonance. I am not trying to convert anyone to the Bahai Faith, PERIOD. That is why I am not proselytizing.

How is it that you think you know more about my intentions than I do? Are you God?

66: O EMIGRANTS! The tongue I have designed for the mention of Me, defile it not with detraction. If the fire of self overcome you, remember your own faults and not the faults of My creatures, inasmuch as every one of you knoweth his own self better than he knoweth others. The Hidden Words of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 45
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
How is it that you think you know more about my intentions than I do?
I don’t think that I know more about your intentions than you do. I’m only considering what I’ve seen you saying, repeatedly: That the reason you teach the Faith is because Bahá’u’lláh wants us to, and that the reason that He wants us to teach is for more people to become Baha’is.
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
@Trailblazer I’m sorry, you can’t bludgeon me into submission or silence with quotes from the writings. Haven’t we seen more than enough of that, between Baha’is? As an experiment, you could try reasoning with me.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I don’t think that I know more about your intentions than you do. I’m only considering what I’ve seen you saying, repeatedly: That the reason you teach the Faith is because Bahá’u’lláh wants us to, and that the reason that He wants us to teach is for more people to become Baha’is.
Whatever Baha'u'llah did was for the sake of God, not for anyone else.

“Who can ever believe that this Servant of God hath at any time cherished in His heart a desire for any earthly honor or benefit? The Cause associated with His Name is far above the transitory things of this world. Behold Him, an exile, a victim of tyranny, in this Most Great Prison. His enemies have assailed Him on every side, and will continue to do so till the end of His life. Whatever, therefore, He saith unto you is wholly for the sake of God, that haply the peoples of the earth may cleanse their hearts from the stain of evil desire, may rend its veil asunder, and attain unto the knowledge of the one true God—the most exalted station to which any man can aspire. Their belief or disbelief in My Cause can neither profit nor harm Me. We summon them wholly for the sake of God. He, verily, can afford to dispense with all creatures.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 85
I never said that the reason Baha'ullah wants us to teach is so more people will become Baha'is because Baha'u'llah never said that is the reason we should teach. Baha'u'llah said that we should proclaim His Message wholly for the sake of God. That is what I do. It is not my responsibility if someone chooses to become a Baha'i or not, and I never even think about it.

“Be unrestrained as the wind, while carrying the Message of Him Who hath caused the Dawn of Divine Guidance to break. Consider, how the wind, faithful to that which God hath ordained, bloweth upon all the regions of the earth, be they inhabited or desolate. Neither the sight of desolation, nor the evidences of prosperity, can either pain or please it. It bloweth in every direction, as bidden by its Creator. So should be every one that claimeth to be a lover of the one true God. It behoveth him to fix his gaze upon the fundamentals of His Faith, and to labor diligently for its propagation. Wholly for the sake of God he should proclaim His Message, and with that same spirit accept whatever response his words may evoke in his hearer. He who shall accept and believe, shall receive his reward; and he who shall turn away, shall receive none other than his own punishment.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 339
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
@Trailblazer I’m sorry, you can’t bludgeon me into submission or silence with quotes from the writings. Haven’t we seen more than enough of that, between Baha’is? As an experiment, you could try reasoning with me.
I am not trying to bludgeon anyone into submission or silence but I am not going to paraphrase Baha'u'llah when I can quote Him.

Reasoning with you about what?
 

Jim

Nets of Wonder
I never said that the reason Baha'ullah wants us to teach is so more people will become Baha'is because Baha'u'llah never said that is the reason we should teach.
I’m sorry for misquoting you. I was thinking of this:
No, I share because that is what Baha’u’llah has exhorted me to do, and for NO other reason. If more Baha’is took Baha’u’llah seriously this Faith would be a lot bigger by now.
“If more Baha’is took Baha’u’llah seriously this Faith would be a lot bigger by now,” doesn’t mean to you that one reason Bahá’u’lláh wants us to teach is for the Faith to get bigger? Getting bigger would just be an accidental side effect of taking Him seriously, and not at all part of what He intended?

Maybe “cognitive dissonance” isn’t the best way to describe it. It’s hard to find words. Maybe something like “Never let the right hand know what the left is doing.”
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I’m sorry for misquoting you. I was thinking of this:

“If more Baha’is took Baha’u’llah seriously this Faith would be a lot bigger by now,” doesn’t mean to you that one reason Bahá’u’lláh wants us to teach is for the Faith to get bigger? Getting bigger would just be an accidental side effect of taking Him seriously, and not at all part of what He intended?
I was not speaking for Baha'u'llah, I was speaking for myself, but I do not even know if this is true that Baha'is do not take Baha'u'llah seriously or that if they did there would be more Baha'is by now. I do not know what Baha'u'llah intended because He did not state that. All that He stated is that the only reason we should teach is for the sake of God. He did not say anything about the Faith getting bigger. That was my overlay but now I am taking it back.
 
Top