• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Elon Musk personally thwarted a Ukrainian attack and saved the Russian Navy

There has never been any sort of excuse for the despot to drop whatsoever, Putin is a thug and a tyrant, and has been for a long time. What is really unfortunate is that so are the neocons in Washington. That leaves us with a proxy war wherein the eastern imperialist is fighting western imperialists at the expense of Ukraine, the pawn in all of this, it's their blood being shed. Sorry but I'm not a cheerleader for the side that wears the white hats vs the side that wears the black hats because that is not the way it is.
So stop banging on about the thug, tyrant and despot being "provoked" by NATO then.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
"Practically everyone"? What world are you living in cos it sure ain't the real one. America is a bigger threat to world peace than totalitarian regimes?!

The perception that the US is a threat to world peace is far from uncommon, especially in the Global South, and I do agree with it based on historical and geopolitical precedents set by the US over the last several decades. Two examples demonstrating that this view is quite common:



That said, I see the US' support for Ukraine as a significantly positive thing, and I agree with helping Ukraine fend off Russia's imperialist, hostile invasion. What NATO is doing seems to me the best approach because it helps Ukraine while avoiding escalation into a third world war via direct confrontation with Russia.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
So stop banging on about the thug, tyrant and despot being "provoked" by NATO then.
Why, it's no excuse for Putin and really asinine to suggest that it is? Imagine if you will, "but your honour, I killed everyone because I was provoked." Do you think that is an excuse? Really? Why do you suggest that being provoked is an excuse to invade? I certainly don't think it is. Why do you?
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
Considering how stubborn Ukraine is...
helping Russia is an act of heroism. I guess. ;)

Being "stubborn" in defending one's country from a hostile invasion is perfectly reasonable and also admirable. Just because some don't like doesn't mean that it is "heroic" to help an imperialist invader violate another country's sovereignty, kill tens of thousands of its civilians, and commit war crimes.
 
Why, it's no excuse for Putin and really asinine to suggest that it is? Imagine if you will, "but your honour, I killed everyone because I was provoked." Do you think that is an excuse? Really? Why do you suggest that being provoked is an excuse to invade? I certainly don't think it is. Why do you?
You're the one who insists that Putin was "provoked" so go look in a mirror. I'm making no excuses for him whatsoever cos there aren't any and your arguments for provocation are sorely lacking as it is.
 
The perception that the US is a threat to world peace is far from uncommon, especially in the Global South, and I do agree with it based on historical and geopolitical precedents set by the US over the last several decades. Two examples demonstrating that this view is quite common:



That said, I see the US' support for Ukraine as a significantly positive thing, and I agree with helping Ukraine fend off Russia's imperialist, hostile invasion. What NATO is doing seems to me the best approach because it helps Ukraine while avoiding escalation into a third world war via direct confrontation with Russia.
The US is a superpower for sure and has a checkered past to say the least, like the UK. It's hardly a threat to world peace and isn't threatening nukes or a third world war or the like. Those threats emanate from totalitarian states and thankfully we don't live in one.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Practically everyone but you acknowledges the fact that the US is the single greatest threat to world peace.
Soeak for yourself. I don't agree. At all. It's nkt the best thing for world peace and stability, but it's far from the greatest threat.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
You're the one who insists that Putin was "provoked" so go look in a mirror. I'm making no excuses for him whatsoever cos there aren't any and your arguments for provocation are sorely lacking as it is.
Who is saying it's an excuse besides you and perhaps some other cheerleaders? It's not an excuse and it blows me away that you can't help yourself but suggest that it is, and if you deny and don't understand how Nato is a threat than sure, whatever you say.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
The US is a superpower for sure and has a checkered past to say the least, like the UK. It's hardly a threat to world peace and isn't threatening nukes or a third world war or the like. Those threats emanate from totalitarian states and thankfully we don't live in one.

I think it's entirely possible for a state to be a threat to world peace or the global order without being totalitarian, although I think that at this time, Russia poses a greater threat due to its ongoing invasion (while the US is now not actively involved with American forces in any direct war against another country) and especially due to Putin's threats of using nukes. China is also aiding him and exacerbating this risk by enabling him to continue the war through geopolitical and economic support.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The poll suggests you are of a minority opinion.
You clearly didn't read them.
Inequality is seen as the biggest threat to global democracy
FT_17.07.27_US_threat_median.png
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Being "stubborn" in defending one's country from a hostile invasion is perfectly reasonable and also admirable. Just because some don't like doesn't mean that it is "heroic" to help an imperialist invader violate another country's sovereignty, kill tens of thousands of its civilians, and commit war crimes.
Hostile invasion, kinda like Americans invading Iraq on the basis of a lie.
:)
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
What does this have to do with Russia's invasion of Ukraine? Does the US' unjustified war of aggression somehow excuse Russia's?
Well...it was the entire NATO in on it...so, all European countries were somehow involved...
No...I would never condone Putin's decision. He should have never done that.

But NATO's behavior must have led Putin to think: if the West did it, so can I.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
Well...it was the entire NATO in on it...so, all European countries were somehow involved...

This is factually incorrect. For example:


No...I would never condone Putin's decision. He should have never done that.

Yet you said this:

Considering how stubborn Ukraine is...
helping Russia is an act of heroism. I guess. ;)

If you don't condone Putin's position, why would you describe helping Russia as an "act of heroism"?

But NATO's behavior must have led Putin to think: if the West did it, so can I.

This is your conclusion, not something for which we have evidence, since we couldn't possibly read Putin's mind. He has blamed the West for his aggression, to be sure, but I see no reason to believe he's not merely doing so to deflect and generate propaganda in favor of his actions.
 

lukethethird

unknown member
Once again, you can't answer a simple question without tying your superiority complex to it.

I said it was ALLEGED. I'm asking for your opinion of his ALLEGED actions.
So far it's he said she said but no doubt you have already made your assumptions. Surprise, surprise.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
So far it's he said she said but no doubt you have already made your assumptions. Surprise, surprise.
Literally repeating yourself verbatim without even reading what you're responding to.

I've just asked a simple question. IF it is true, what Musk is alleged to have done, I assume you'd be against it. Correct?
 
Top