The prime cause of regimes where millions were killed was antitheism. I can play reduction to the absurd too.Doh! Why didn't I think of that!? Solve the problem by ignoring one of the prime causes!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The prime cause of regimes where millions were killed was antitheism. I can play reduction to the absurd too.Doh! Why didn't I think of that!? Solve the problem by ignoring one of the prime causes!
This is also one of the problems with Islam. It has volumes upon volumes of ahadith that can contradict each other widely. I believe you that these Imams are invoking Muhammad, but so are those who practice FGM. This is worsened by the fact that within the Ummah there is no central authority similar to a Pope or anything, so Muslims can differ widely in the same issue and each can bring a hadith to back his assertion.So did the Imams condemning it.
So do a substantial number of Jews, Christians and atheists.Yes, yes, yes ADA - we KNOW that "not all Muslims" do X or think X.
The problem is that a substantial number do practice misogyny on a world-wide basis.
Of course, since we heathens have no scripture encouraging/commanding/condoningSo do a substantial number of Jews, Christians and atheists.
Yes but Jews, Christians and atheists don't practice:So do a substantial number of Jews, Christians and atheists.
The prime cause of regimes where millions were killed was antitheism. I can play reduction to the absurd too.
No, and even if you believe so, not to the degree that it can be in the ahadith volumes. It's basically just a bunch of Chinese whispers and was compiled 200 years after Muhammad.I mean can the same thing not be observed in near every theistic religion?
I don't think having a central figure helps as much as you might think, given the many fragmented beliefs and practices of Catholics. And it's nor like women's issues don't have conflicting responses in Judaism. Some still believe in virginity testing being a proper thing to have been done.This is also one of the problems with Islam. It has volumes upon volumes of ahadith that can contradict each other widely. I believe you that these Imams are invoking Muhammad, but so are those who practice FGM. This is worsened by the fact that within the Ummah there is no central authority similar to a Pope or anything, so Muslims can differ widely in the same issue and each can bring a hadith to back his assertion.
I think you have an unfamiliarity with Islam that isn't really helping. Roman Catholics are actually quite a consistent bunch compared with Muslims.I don't think having a central figure helps as much as you might think, given the many fragmented beliefs and practices of Catholics. And it's nor like women's issues don't have conflicting responses in Judaism. Some still believe in virginity testing being a proper thing to have been done.
Goes just above alienating approximately a billion people who would also find the practice somewhere on the spectrum of distasteful to evil.
Neverninding Roman Catholics aren't all Catholics. Not even all Papal supremacy Catholics, I've seen enough Roman Catholics alone to understand their differing beliefs on matters if Papal supremacy as well as interpretations of his words, words of past popes, priesthood and the bible as well as the catechism and otger supplemental writings.I think you have an unfamiliarity with Islam that isn't really helping. Roman Catholics are actually quite a consistent bunch compared with Muslims.
Antitheism has never been anti-dogma. Some of the most dogmatic people I've met us the term. They just pretend their anti religious rhetoric is something other than dogma.Which is to - once again and repeatedly - mischaracterize fascism. I assume you're talking about the 20th century's most heinous fascists? If so, they were antitheists the way that Hitler was a vegetarian. Their mindset was to create new dogma, not defeat dogma.
Liberal Christians don't believe the bible or it's ideology is flawed. Only the interpretation of the literalist. Expecting something else from Muslims would be a double standard.The problem is that Muslims defend every jot and tiddle of Islam. If a decent percentage of Muslims were to acknowledge that Islam has some flaws - like every other ideology - then of course alienating a 1.6 billion people wouldn't be a great approach. But Muslims stand firm. Islam is simply NOT to be criticized. That makes them pretty challenging to problem solve with.
Antitheism has never been anti-dogma. Some of the most dogmatic people I've met us the term. They just pretend their anti religious rhetoric is something other than dogma.
Continuing to ignore the voices who speak out against those things within Islam in the effort to judge the whole of Islam won't help matters.Yes but Jews, Christians and atheists don't practice:
- Honour killing
- widespread FGM
- Not allowing women to drive
- Not allowing women to leave the house without a male guardian
- Claiming that a woman's testimony is worth half a man's (Shari'a)
- Having a Prophet that slept with a 9 year old girl, thus giving rise to thousands of child marriages backed up by scripture
- Polygyny (I actually support this, but many people consider it misogynistic so it's going on the list)
it goes on.
Liberal Christians don't believe the bible or it's ideology is flawed. Only the interpretation of the literalist. Expecting something else from Muslims would be a double standard.
Theistic religions are inherently harmful.Please - apart from those famous fascists - give me an example or two of dogma coming from anti-theists?
I'm not ignoring anything. You claimed that Jews and Christians etc. were basically no better, so I gave examples of things that, in my opinion, makes Islam much, much worse.Continuing to ignore the voices who speak out against those things within Islam in the effort to judge the whole of Islam won't help matters.
"FGM (female genital mutilation), is a "cultural thing", and has nothing to do with Islam. "We hear over and over that FGM (female genital mutilation), is a "cultural thing", and has nothing to do with Islam.
But somehow this horrific bit of "culture" seems to have followed Muslim immigrants to Australia. A summary from the links below:
- It's estimated that over 80,000 girls in Australia have had FGM
- It's estimated that there are three such horrible occurrences in Australia EVERY DAY.
New Report on FGM in Australia- 3 girls per day are "at risk" - NOFGM AUSTRALIA | Protecting Girls Empowering Survivors
Women convicted over genital mutilation of girls 'showed no remorse'
Oh, and BTW, about 500,000 girls in the US have suffered FGM or are at risk.
Female genital mutilation in the United States - Wikipedia
Now, I'm a white male, "privileged" some feminists might say. But I have two daughters.
So where is the feminist outrage? Too busy dealing with micro-aggressions and man-splaining?