The Jews do not require the Bible or Quran interpretations, the Chrisrians do not require the Quran interpretations, so likewise you offer the Musilms do not need the Revelation of Baha’u’llah for interpretation, yet history proves that a Messenger is required to clarify past scriptures.
Would you say Muhammad imposed the correct interpretation on the Bible to the Christians? I would suggest Muhammad gave the Revelation from God giving the ability to see the Bible in the Light given by God, but God never imposes.
I think each side has good reasons to reject the "corrections" made by the person claiming to be the new prophet.
For Christians, it is obvious that the Jews aren't understanding or interpreting their Scriptures correctly.
Coming for an Islamic background, I can see why they believe that Christians are wrong.
And now you with the Baha'i Faith, easy to see from your "frame" of reference, but to a Jew, a Christian, or a Muslim... Baha'is are wrong.
So yeah, the frame of reference matters. But from their reasoning, the other religions are the ones wrong, not them. What else would you expect? Do you really think that your interpretations are that profound as to make them see the light?
The Quran tells humans to use reasoning and says it's a way to avoid hell. The way Quran corrects the Torah and Bible is logical. It doesn't make sense for example for Solomon (a) to be emphasized to be chosen from God and wise, then dies a pagan after God chose him. Other corrections makes sense too.
However, the Bahai Faith, you would not through reasoning arrive at the conclusions your Prophet came up with. It's far fetch interpretations and is not appealing to reason, but appealing to forego reason and common sense.
Yes, Link is giving an example.
Why don't any Muslims believe Angels (a) are humans? Why is only Bahais who come up with this conclusion?
If your Prophet did not tell you Angels were saintly humans and God's Angels are Prophets and the chosen ones, do you think you would arrive at this conclusion?
And then another example... Why would a person interpret things and come to those same conclusions that Baha'u'llah does if they weren't a believer?
So now you want to talk about Angels?
No, those were examples. And in the Bible, I think there is a real good case for angels being spirit-beings, which sometimes appeared as humans. So, what does that mean? Maybe that the Baha'i interpretation is wrong.
It is part of this debate... Are Muslims interpreting things wrong? Or... is it Baha'is? And to a Christian, you're both wrong. Then to a Jew? Well, we can guess what they probably would say.