Perhaps you don't recognize the irony of this statement??I think what you mean is that your understanding of God and Heaven are very limited in comparison to mine but you prefer your limited understanding because it salves your ego.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps you don't recognize the irony of this statement??I think what you mean is that your understanding of God and Heaven are very limited in comparison to mine but you prefer your limited understanding because it salves your ego.
If your version of god that you choose to believe in demands that people worship him in a precise way or he will not allow them into his little country club...then I have bad news for you...he's egotistical.I do not believe that God is egotistical. I believe that He is loving and has done everything in His power to get people to go to Heaven.
So, essentially, your god is like a conceited chef. Made a meal he expects everyone to love and can't handle it that some people simply don't care for it and are happy with another cook's meal. Now he stomps his feet and throws a tantrum and demands that those people aren't ever allowed back in the restaurant again.Everyone is in God's sight all the time no matter where they are because He is omnipresent. No one else is worthy of worship. I can understand His POV. He created everything to be perfect but others have marred that perfection. I can understand why He would be at odds with those who think a broken world is more worthy than a perfect world.
Going to wherever is not the same thing as going to Heaven.
Really? Sounds like people who are loving and generous and accepting of others seem to want to act that way towards others regardless of a god that wants them to be as petty and exclusive as he is.It is not God who is exclusive but people who refuse to hear God who have excluded themselves. God has freely told us how to get to Heaven. Then there are those who have heard God but just don't want to go to Heaven.
I actually do think that you and I believe in the same God. My comment was made in a moment of utter frustratation. We clearly understand Him quite differently, though.There is only one God. If you have another he is not God.
How on earth could you have come to that conclusion based on what I said is beyond me. Actually, I believe you're wrong on both counts. If anyone's understanding of God and Heaven are limited, it's yours, not mine. Your understanding of God and Heaven is limited to the Bible. My understanding of God and Heaven is expanded to include not only an account of God's dealings with His children in the Eastern Hemisphere, but an account of His dealings with his "other sheep" in the Western Hemisphere. It is further enhanced by the words of living prophets, personally chosen by God, through whom he continues to communicate in order that the purety of His word will be maintained and not corrupted by the philosophies of men. Granted, both of us have the Holy Ghost to confirm to us what is true and what is false. Unfortunately, we don't seem to be getting the same message from Him. With respect to my "ego," it doesn't need to be saved. I'm not the one who is insisting that only a relative few -- including you, but not including Draka, for instance -- will be granted the blessing of living in Heaven forever. From where I'm sitting, it looks like you're the one with the fragile ego.I think what you mean is that your understanding of God and Heaven are very limited in comparison to mine but you prefer your limited understanding because it salves your ego.
During the three day period following His death, Jesus Christ (in spirit form) visited the spirits of the wicked who were consigned to "Prison" after their deaths. They had died without the opportunity to hear His gospel and to understand how He had atoned for their sins. He taught them His gospel. While not all accepted it, some did, and were consequently released from the state of anguish they were in prior to receiving the knowledge of His love and grace. There are people in the Spirit Prison today, people who might have very well lived their lives quite differently had they had the same knowledge you have. Paradise, too, continues to exist today. The spirits of the righteous are there. One such spirit belongs to a repentant thief who hung next to Jesus on the cross. Jesus recognized that this man had a good heart, regardless of the fact that, like everyone else who has ever lived, he had made mistakes during his life. Many of the spirits of those who are now in Paradise awaiting the resurrection and final judgment are good people (Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and yes -- even pagans and atheists ). For one reason or another, they did not accept Jesus Christ during their lives. For some, this may have been due to pride and stubbornness. They will probably not change their minds while they still have a chance. Others, though, were not Christians for a wide variety of reasons, many of which we don't fully understand, and others of which shoud be blatantly obvious to anyone with more than a half a dozen brain cells. There are no two ways to cut it: A child living in the slums of Calcutta, a child growing up in a remote Kenyan village or a child raised among Muslim terrorists in Iraq DOES NOT have the same opportunity to accept Jesus Christ as a child in the U.S. Furthermore, even people in a predominantly Christian nation have such varying backgrounds that it's impossible for you or me to fully understand their spiritual choices. In the Spirit World, the playing field will be leveled, and those who are really searching for the truth WILL FIND IT!However for the sake of argument, Perhaps you can say how a Pagan could get to Heaven if that is what you are referring to.
I think what you mean is that your understanding of God and Heaven are very limited in comparison to mine but you prefer your limited understanding because it salves your ego.
God has freely told us how to get to Heaven. Then there are those who have heard God but just don't want to go to Heaven.
I agree with you... mostly.Interpretation? All I am saying is that a Christian could sin all they want because if they are eventually truly sorry, God will forgive them. Even many Christians would agree with this. I'm not saying Christians do this, I'm just saying that they could. Nothing you have said so far has shook this "interpretation".
Hmm. I'm going to start a new thread in General Religious Debates about this, 'cause now I'm curious.What exactley do you mean by Christianity does not value good works? Of course, Christians themselves value good works, they're human. But the Christian God, the most important thing to do with Christianity, does not value good works. I'm not being dishonest or anything like that. Go and ask most Christians and they will tell you, God does not value good works.
You may have misunderstood me. I'm not at all saying that Christians do this, I'm just making a point that they could. It is true that a Christian could sin all they want, because if they are truly sorry, God will forgive them. All I was asking is, why don't Christians sin when they want to? They are going to be forgiven, so why don't they sin?
Yes this makes things clearer. I know that it would be really hard to be truly sorry if it was all part of the plan in the first place. But my point is if they were truly sorry, they would be forgiven.I agree with you... mostly.
Here is the my one exception to what you are saying:
It's the idea that someone could go out and sin, purposefully and with the distinct idea that he can do so, because God will forgive him if he just asks. I just don't think that this jives with what Christianity allows you to do, because it would indicate that you have actually not "accepted Jesus into your heart" and are "trampling upon Jesus".
Mostly, I just don't think you can sincerely ask for forgiveness if this is what you are doing; and I think sincerity is a necessary component of forgiveness-asking.
Is this any more clear?
From what I've seen its like this: there is heaven and there is hell. Christians go to heaven and non-Christians got to hell, regardless of how "good" they've been. We are all sinners, sinning once is the same as sinning a thousand times. Its simple, believe in Jesus and you are forgiven, don't and you are not. There is not even any room for God to value good works. Christian = heaven, not Christian = hell, no in-between.Hmm. I'm going to start a new thread in General Religious Debates about this, 'cause now I'm curious.
I do think good works is valued in Christianity the religion, but you make an interesting distinction about the Christian God.
Your right, maybe they do have reasons not to sin. But like you also said, its not going to effect their salvation. I just find that wrong. They might not want to, but the point I'm making is that they could sin all they want.Because it would make Jesus sad? Because it just seems disrespectful? Because it would indicate that a change of heart has not happened? I'm sure the list could go on, but the specific answer that you want-- "they don't sin because it would effect their salvation"-- is the one I can't honestly give.
I do not believe that God is egotistical. I believe that He is loving and has done everything in His power to get people to go to Heaven.
Let's say I'm standing there and God says that I have failed to accept him and I say "Oh...well, I'd rather go to that nice place anyway" and start walking toward the door. Who's going to stop me from going to Heaven?
It is not God who is exclusive but people who refuse to hear God who have excluded themselves. God has freely told us how to get to Heaven. Then there are those who have heard God but just don't want to go to Heaven.
Greetings Holdem. If you allow that eternal life or salvation is akin to going to heaven, would it be safe to say that most Americans and most Christians do not fall within the scope of your OP. That is, most Christians do not believe that only Christians go to heaven. Check out the following survey. http://religions.pewforum.org/reports#For those who believe that only Christians go to heaven...
Its obvious that not all get an equal chance to become a Christian. For example, a child born in India (where 80% of the population is Hindu) does not have the same chance of becoming Christian as a child born in the USA (where I think 70%+ are Christian?).
I don't know why, but for some reason many Christians seem to think that you will be held accountable for not following, once you have simply "heard" of the Bible. Hearing of the Bible does not make everything all equal.
Obviously this is not at all fair. So does God either let non-Christians into heaven or does he give some a MUCH better chance than others? I don't see any other way around it .
Greetings Holdem. If you allow that eternal life or salvation is akin to going to heaven, would it be safe to say that most Americans and most Christians do not fall within the scope of your OP. That is, most Christians do not believe that only Christians go to heaven. Check out the following survey. http://religions.pewforum.org/reports#
(select 2)
"A major survey by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life finds that most Americans have a non-dogmatic approach to faith. A strong majority of those who are affiliated with a religion, including majorities of nearly every religious tradition, do not believe their religion is the only way to salvation.......Most Americans agree with the statement that many religions not just their own can lead to eternal life. Among those who are affiliated with a religious tradition, seven-in-ten say many religions can lead to eternal life."
Oh I'm pretty sure an elite club like that must have bouncers!![/color]
Since God is ALL powerful (can do ANYthing) and is doing everything in his power to get people to go to heaven.....how is it possible that some won't make it there?
Let's say I'm standing there and God says that I have failed to accept him and I say "Oh...well, I'd rather go to that nice place anyway" and start walking toward the door. Who's going to stop me from going to Heaven?
Right! Often Christians will say that God does not keep people out of heaven, but rather people keep themselves out. But when we get to the pearly gates, and it's obvious that there's two pretty different eternal destinations in front of us, it's my understanding that God (the infinitely brawny bouncer) will throw people into hell even if they protest and would rather go to heaven.Oh I'm pretty sure an elite club like that must have bouncers!!
It's like the guy who beats his wife because she just won't listen. Is it correct to say that SHE chooses the beating? That if she would only listen she would not be punished so those black eyes are HER fault?
It's like the guy who beats his wife because she just won't listen. Is it correct to say that SHE chooses the beating? That if she would only listen she would not be punished so those black eyes are HER fault?
So hand a bruthah a couple frubals will ya?OMG! That sounds so spot on!
What do you say to a woman with two black eyes?Preach on brother! I jus' hate it when dumb broads make you hit 'em. It's not like I want to, but they jus' keeps askin' fer it. I tells 'em - don't make me angry, but they does it anyway.
I don't believe it's infallible, but the traditional Christian response to the dilemma of what happens to those who have never heard the gospel of Jesus Christ is the most compelling reason for me to accept the LDS Church's doctrine instead. It is not only much more logical (given the fact that God is supposed to be loving and merciful), but does not contradict anything the Bible has to say on the subject.If one is to accept the Bible as infallible, then one must also accept that God will damn those who never hear of Him.
:no:
Except perhaps the part where followers are charged to go forth and spread the message of salvation to the four corners of the earth. Seems like a waste of time if they're going to get a much better sales pitch later. Plus it's got to be hard to find those corners....I don't believe it's infallible, but the traditional Christian response to the dilemma of what happens to those who have never heard the gospel of Jesus Christ is the most compelling reason for me to accept the LDS Church's doctrine instead. It is not only much more logical (given the fact that God is supposed to be loving and merciful), but does not contradict anything the Bible has to say on the subject.
It's not a waste of time to 900 or so people per day. Have you ever heard the story about the man who walked up and down the beach throwing starfish back in the ocean?Seems like a waste of time if they're going to get a much better sales pitch later.