I'm not blaming others.
Let's say that your place of residence was invaded by terorists, some of your family kidnapped and killed, and then they send rockets to destroy those who remain. What would you do? Just sit around and relitigate what's happened over the last several decades?
Now, don't song & dance this-- please stick to the question posed.
Sorry to answer this late, I just started reading this thread and may not finish it so if I'm duplicating something that you've already answered ignore it.
OK then. Let's complete the story to make it more like the Gaza situation. After entering my home and murdering people, they run up the street and enter an apartment building, taking some hostages with them. They barricade the whole building and start firing through the windows at the police (of course the police are involved by now). So what should the police do? Mine and blow up the whole building, killing the terrorists and any innocent person inside that gets caught in the blast? That's the current solution that's being applied.
I'm not an expert on these situations, but I suspect the police would ...
- Clear the immediate area
- Surround the building with armed cops and SWAT teams
- Put snipers on the surrounding roof tops
- Call in hostage negotiators
- Attempt to establish communications with the terrorists
- If all else failed, wait them out
- If that failed, I don't know, I said I'm no expert.
I imagine you will claim this is a bad comparison, but why? All the components are similar, terrorist attack, hostages, retreat to another fortified position, innocent participants. I agree that the equivalents to these police actions are difficult, but I would suggest that "blowing up the building" should always be the last resort, and even then avoided if simply waiting were possible.
Have I answered fairly and stuck to your question?