• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hamas must be eradicated

setarcos

The hopeful or the hopeless?
God in Judement day will decided right and wrong ,Actualy we here in Muslim world have no more trust in West claims about human rights and democracy.all become bull****. Gaza genocide,show real face of West .
I know people don't agree what happening , but nothing they can do,Israeli lobby much bigger take full control on Western media.
In judgement day? Until then what? Right and wrong is relative?
I understand your mistrust. The west has committed horrible sins. But has the "west" no right to mistrust the "Muslim world" with its fatwa's and jihad's declaring the whole sale destruction of those who don't bow down to their specific ideologies with the use of indiscriminate murder of innocent civilians by suicide bombers, hijackers, and so called holy martyrs for the cause? Has the Muslim world not done horrendous things? Has the Muslim world not subjugated its own people to inhumane treatment? Hasn't the Muslim world even fought among itself with those other Muslims who profess different interpretations and lineages within Islam? Hasn't some in the Muslim world gave lip service to Allah's will while actively justifying going against that will? Or is Allah the kind of God that finds torture, rape, mutilation, and the murder of defeated, defenseless soldiers, not to mention the inhumane subjugation of Allah's own professed believers by others who worship Allah to be justified and good.
Are these the right questions to be asking? For instance who do you think the Muslim world consists of? Who do you think the western world consists of?
Why do you ignore a Muslims public statements endorsing genocide while ignoring the fact that many "westerners" actively protect Muslim rights? Why do you call it a western genocide when Hamas initiated its beginnings and actively promotes the increased probability of Palestinian civilians getting killed?
We continually and consistently sustain in ourselves the wrong answers to the wrong questions. These things don't arise because they are an isolated western problem or Muslim problem. These things are a humanity problem.
So many people are too busy condemning the "others" for their problems that they lose any awareness of the problems they themselves contribute. As long as both sides choose to continue along that path the human species is doomed to wallow in the hell all parties have contributed to creating and sustaining. God, or Allah as the case may be, help us to help ourselves.
And for what is worth...may you find some little bit of piece in your soul.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Not really. Israel has a large sophisticated military, supported at land and sea by the might of the US armed forces. Hamas, a terrorist organisation, that holds the people of Palestine hostage, un-elected and unrepresentative and unaccountable, is not a military power. The people of Palestine, have no army or navy or airforce to fight back with. Not that they started this war, Hamas did, and now, Israel is acting as if it has a right to **** on the Geneva Conventions.
We should note that Hamas is not merely a terrorist
organization. It also provides health services.
Similarly, Israel commits terrorism against Palestinians,
yet it clearly is far more than a terrorist state.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
The Geneva Conventions did not exist until after WW2, which Israel are signatory to. As I'v already said, WW2 is a poor analogy, given the power imbalance. That did not exist between the Nazis and axis powers and the allies.

The Geneva conventions existed before WWII, but it was after WWII that civilians were added.

So I'm trying to understand your point. I thought it was about comparing civilian casualties, but that's not it? So now it's about the idea that Israel has a better military than Hamas? So are you saying something like the combatant with the stronger military should be compelled to pull punches? Really?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Not really. Israel has a large sophisticated military, supported at land and sea by the might of the US armed forces. Hamas, a terrorist organisation, that holds the people of Palestine hostage, un-elected and unrepresentative and unaccountable, is not a military power. The people of Palestine, have no army or navy or airforce to fight back with. Not that they started this war, Hamas did, and now, Israel is acting as if it has a right to **** on the Geneva Conventions.
So why does it fall on Israel to rid the world of Hamas?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Hamas wants to eliminate Israel's existence.
Israel wants to eliminate Hamas's existence.
2 peas in a pod....although Israel is the deadlier pea.
You really think there is anything like an equivalence between Israel and Hamas? In general the world thinks of nations very differently than it thinks of terrorist organizations.
 

setarcos

The hopeful or the hopeless?
The land mass between syria and egypt is palestine.

The locals, are the palestinians. Israel exists within palestine.
Yes and no. Yes Palestine names a particular area. But what do you mean by locals? Israelis were local as well until the forced diaspora. Palestine isn't the state of Arab Palestinians which was suddenly taken away from those Palestinians that suddenly decided to collectively declare a national identity.
At one point Israelis were Palestinians in that sense as well.
And at one point all the local nation states had a piece. Including the Egyptians, Romans, Phoenicians, Canaanites, and other Semitic tribes, none of which were known as particular Palestinians that had a national identity.

Sure the UN established a Jewish state within palestine.
Yes, yet everyone seems to conveniently forget that Jews were living within Palestine prior to the diaspora events and the UN mandate of a Jewish state. About better than 2000 years before.
Israel is not being condemned for responding to the atrocities of HAMAS but for the over extended retaliation.
Really? Pay attention to the pro-Palestinian protests. Its as if they believe the attacks happened without cause. Without cause because a lot of them are publicly and proudly celebrating not just a Hamas victory by brave and honorable Hamas warriors who only want their own state but their actively celebrating the way in which it was achieved and what it did to those it achieved it on.
I've also noticed even those humanitarians who are concerned with the Palestinian people ignore or downplay Hamas's part in starting this mess and continuously doing what they can to ensure a tragic Palestinian body count.
Over extended? The reality of the war is such that Israel has been put into a place of any response being tragic for the Palestinian people as a direct result of how Hamas operates or the equivalent of no response at all which would do nothing but encourage the likelihood of similar tragedies to happen in the future if not worse ones.
I don't think we fully realize the reality of wars in the middle east when the enemy has no concern for human dignity, rights, or decency to begin with.
If you try and fight a mud monster your gonna get muddy. That's the reality of the situation.
I know what HAMAS did was horrid, what is sick is watching Jews all over the world being abused for what israel is doing which has nothing to do with Jews or judaism.
No, but it does have everything to do with eliminating a sickening ideology whos publicly professed goal is to kill every Jew no matter where.
Israel DOES NOT represent the JEWS of the world.
And yet its literally a Jewish state. Try telling that to the Jews themselves who identify Israel itself as their native land. But your technically right, just like America doesn't represent Christians but generally acts or purports to act in accord with general Christian moral values. Now try telling that to the radical Muslim world. Try telling that to Hamas. You know, the one that publicly asked for all Muslims to take up arms and kill all the Jews. Try telling that to the Palestinian protesters who attack Jewish couples in the wrong place at the wrong time just trying to get to synagogue.
What i have been debating with an israeli defender is that the apartheid, oppression and illegal occupation is wrong and has been wrong for decades.
What do you mean apartheid? There is 250,000 Palestinians living within Israel proper now. You'll have to clarify what you mean by oppression and how you mean they are being oppressed? What occupation are you referring to and how is it illegal?
That long held divide is what created the monsters called HAMAS.
My big toe. Multitudes of peoples throughout history have been oppressed and subjugated. Not many have produced the sickening ideologies of Hamas which by the way have been apparently embraced at least by many of the Palestinian protesters here in the states.
Oppression may breed resistance but in no way does it inevitably breed inhumane ideologies. That's just an excuse to blame others as justification for tolerance of the existence of such things.
And the attempt of trying to eliminate palestinians from the region will create even more monsters.
And here it is again. This is how hatred begins. With the spread of misinformation or misrepresentation of some data. Wherever did you get the idea that Israel wants to eliminate Palestinians? You would think they would start within their own country with the 250,000 that reside there first. Just kick em out of the country proper as a starting point.
We create monsters where there are none and ignore the monsters that don't need creating.
 

setarcos

The hopeful or the hopeless?
Hamas wants to eliminate Israel's existence.
Israel wants to eliminate Hamas's existence.
2 peas in a pod....although Israel is the deadlier pea.
Certainly can't disagree with you here.
I would just add that its not simply Hamas its the inhumane and sick ideologies that Hamas publicly promotes that Israel has promoted as wanting gone which necessarily includes the people that personify the group calling themselves Hamas since in this case you can't simply separate the people from their ideology, easy peasy.
 

setarcos

The hopeful or the hopeless?
Not that they started this war, Hamas did, and now, Israel is acting as if it has a right to **** on the Geneva Conventions.
Its kind of hard not to fail the Geneva Conventions when your enemy is doing everything they can to ensure that.
Slaughter HAMAS by all means, except those means and methods that result in indiscriminate or even the deliberate death of citizens.
Unfortunately a lot easier said than done in an active war.
As for flushing Palestinians out into the Sinai, as I've heard being openly discussed by Israeli policy makers. That is definitely also genocide.
Concerning thinking from angry people, but still not the official policy of the Israeli government thank God. Nor the majority of the policy makers. Reprimands for such talk among other controversial issues has been publicly announced by the Israeli government.
Genocide requires a lot more systematic focus and implementation of ability than Israel has even came close to applying.
That word is just another way of demonizing Israelis for something they are not doing, have publicly denied pursuing in anyway, and have actively implemented - however impractically - procedures to eliminate that possibility. Again, people simply ignore the fact that Hamas is actively doing all it can to subvert and sabotage such implementations.
A theological claim. In the scope of international conflict and war, we have the Geneva Conventions and other international treaties to determine right from wrong.
Agreed. But what's your argument? The Geneva Convention didn't just pop out of a vacuum. I believe that humans didn't just invent what the Geneva Convention should include without aspiring to some sense of innate right and wrong.
And by the way...while the GC is an ideal goal if you will, the very idea of the necessity of war in some cases renders it paradoxical and doomed to fail.
In every known war some form of failure to meet the GC ideals has happened. Its inevitable given the chaotic and tragic nature of war and the characters that play such things out. Its when entire nations collective ideology embraces inhumane practices to achieve their goals that that nation is evil in its conception and should be strongly condemned. Imo
 

setarcos

The hopeful or the hopeless?
This is an interesting development:

They must have a poor understanding of the word genocide.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Certainly can't disagree with you here.
I would just add that its not simply Hamas its the inhumane and sick ideologies that Hamas publicly promotes that Israel has promoted as wanting gone which necessarily includes the people that personify the group calling themselves Hamas since in this case you can't simply separate the people from their ideology, easy peasy.
That's too complex for me to reliably parse.
 

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
Genocide requires a lot more systematic focus and implementation of ability than Israel has even came close to applying.
I am sure we can let the Hague determine that. Starting with this little issue.

"No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Pillage is prohibited. Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited." Article 33 of the Geneva Convention (IV)
 
Last edited:

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
Agreed. But what's your argument? The Geneva Convention didn't just pop out of a vacuum. I believe that humans didn't just invent what the Geneva Convention should include without aspiring to some sense of innate right and wrong.
That is an entirely separate debate not within the scope of this thread. However, I will summarize my position by saying I believe human morality, social contracts, social taboos and other things are entirely subjective and products of historical accident necessity and naturalistic causation. Not any God given absolute notion of morality. That is absurd. By all means create a thread on that topic and I could expand upon greatly. Whilst not derailing this thread.
 
Last edited:

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
They must have a poor understanding of the word genocide.
Perhaps it is your understanding that is wanting?

Article II In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

 
Last edited:

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
The Geneva conventions existed before WWII, but it was after WWII that civilians were added.

So I'm trying to understand your point. I thought it was about comparing civilian casualties, but that's not it? So now it's about the idea that Israel has a better military than Hamas? So are you saying something like the combatant with the stronger military should be compelled to pull punches? Really?
The combatant which is attacking an unarmed civilian population, should pull punches yes. Hamas leadership is not even in Gaza*
*Source: Private Eye Nov 2023 issue
 
Last edited:
Top