There is no OT or NT....again that is a Modern Christianity concept to spead the lie.
There is ONLY one set of scripture, The first 5 books of the Law combined with the oral Law.
EVERYTHING else is commentary on those books. Paul did not write against the Law, he lived by the Law. People twisted his teachings because they didn't understand the Law to begin with. Once you study Judaism you will see what he was really teaching.
Even Poor Muhammed tried to explain that his quotes were meant to be used with the books already in place in hopes of clarifying this, but true to human nature they twisted that out of context as well....try reading the Quran from the back chapters first....very inspiring.
Islam created Muhammed as a demi-god too, not on purpose but it's still a pity. Arabs concider smaller shorter writings less important. The people at first did not know Muhammed was quoting from an Angel, so they would grab a paper ASAP and try and write down what he said (earlier shorter writings) after the people realized what was going on they followed Muhammed around with paper and pen at the ready...making the longer writings. By putting the book together backwards Arabs ruined what Muhammed tried so hard to express. At every turn Muhammed is quoted as saying that his quotes were to go ALONG with the books already written and to NOT use it as stand alone book.
The prophet you can't speak against is the Holy Spirit, which matches Jesus teachings... It wasn't Muhammed, who refers to THAT prophet as pure magic. You only understand that if you read the earlier writings first. In the end...they are all INSPIRED books, but there is only as always the scritures that were given by HaShem on the Holy mountian. Any book, any teaching, any prophet that teaches something different than those original books is a lie.
Islam tossed away the very books they were told to keep, and Modern Christianity is so far in left field it's sad...they think everything in the King James Bible is scripture. For those who believe their ancesters are flies or came back as cows...and or prays to idols.... well...no comment, it isn't worth my time.
Interesting commentary.
Who is the "holy spirit prophet" you speak of ?
The Pauline writings stress not the law but salvation by faith alone. So much so that James, brother of Jesus and leader of the Church of Jerusalem, had to speak out against this doctrine. (See James 2) In this chapter he states that faith without works is dead no less than 3 times.
Jesus also stresses works and not faith (at least in the Gospel of Matt).
As for the OT law .. There is a great difference between the God of the OT and the teachings of Jesus/ God of the NT.
As for the first 5 books, while inspiring, they are hardly inspired.
Genesis is a plagerism of Sumerian creation myths. If you want to realy understand the roots of Judaism that is where one much start.
Adamu were the first the beings created out of Clay by Enlil and the other Gods. The flood, the Ark .. its all in there.
Enlil =Ellil = El. Go read Genesis and see what God is named in the first creation Story. "EL"
Go read Psalm 82 and study what Scholars have to say about that and you will find that "EL" is the name of the Creator .. The Father, and so on according to recent Hebrew Scholarship.
http://www.jhsonline.org/Articles/article_144.pdf
The ideas in the the Journal article above are backed up by Elijah. Elijah tells us that he was the only prophet in all Israel .. 450 to Baal and 400 to Asherah.
The people of Moses and his own Brother certainly did not think much of Moses's God. Moses leaves for a couple of weeks and Aaron makes an idol (Golden Calf) to El/Asherah for the people to worship (their real God .. the God of Abraham)
Moses's new God obviously did not make much of an impact on these people. (Certianly there was no miracles or parting of the Red Sea as the People would not have abandoned the God of Moses so easily)
Then when Moses returns .. 3000 men take sides against his God.
Now of these people had really witnessed a "real God" doing real miracles .. no way they would have gone against Moses.
Moses was a military leader .. the story probably has some basis in fact. As any good Military leader he put dissent down quickly. He has assassins go out and kill the 3000 rebels.
The real story is likely that these people chose sides against Moses .. not God.
Editors of the Bible in Persian times attributed the downfall of the Israelites to displeasing a God. The Persians were Zoroastrian, monotheistic, and against human sacrifice.
Prior to the Persians the Israelites were polytheistic and sacrificed humans. (Yeah .. in the real version of the story Issac likely bit the dust).
Monotheism was adopted because the Persians were monotheistic and they were the power so this must be pleasing to God. The Persians also freed the Jews which was even further evidence that God was trying to tell the Jews something.
Isaiah talks about Cyrus the Great being "annointed by God"
That Modern Judaism parallels Zoroastrianism of the Persians in many ways is not suprising.