sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
LOL. You're funny -- and woefully mistaken.The Bible does not have errors.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
LOL. You're funny -- and woefully mistaken.The Bible does not have errors.
I don't disagree. But I am saying that if you disagree with what is said, then you are treading on thin ice. Either you are saying they don't know what they were writing, or God has no power to write a book. If that is the case, I fail to see how he would have power to write anything especially when it is flawless when understood correctly... not an easy task by any means.OK mista make it black or white if you want to but what good is it? The text leads us to The Son who in turn leads us to The Truth which dwells only with The Father. The text does not lead us to The Father.
Problem is, it's not "flawless" when "understood correctly." Exegesis shows any number of textual flaws.I don't disagree. But I am saying that if you disagree with what is said, then you are treading on thin ice. Either you are saying they don't know what they were writing, or God has no power to write a book. If that is the case, I fail to see how he would have power to write anything especially when it is flawless when understood correctly... not an easy task by any means.
When he was a man he was not God, he emptied himself, madam.Reason. People believe Jesus is God from what they have read. Other people believe Jesus is not God from what they have read from the same book.
I believe Y'shua Ha'Mashiach is not God because I am not able to reason a person can be human and God together. That is me explaining it without scripture. I understand God's son is our view of The Holy God and I trust God's son can be in the likeness of God but not BE God. If he is God he is not man. He is man reflecting the likeness of God. I won't argue the trinity because looking at him is also knowing The Father and the Holy Spirit. But he isn't The Father and The Holy Spirit. Actually I am with the class who assumes God IS The Holy Spirit.
I do not doubt the writing of it. I have no reason to. I never ever said "they don't know what they were writing". I have always said "the original meaning has been lost". I talk and talk and talk about it because I KNOW that what is lost can be found. Have I ever said "all original meaning is lost"? No! Not that either. Men! God will they ever learn to listen?I don't disagree. But I am saying that if you disagree with what is said, then you are treading on thin ice. Either you are saying they don't know what they were writing, or God has no power to write a book. If that is the case, I fail to see how he would have power to write anything especially when it is flawless when understood correctly... not an easy task by any means.
You know it!When he was a man he was not God, he emptied himself, madam.
The Spirit, now combined with the masculine lord, is now in Greek neuter, and yet in the OT spirit was feminine. So now we see that the Holy Spirit is the feminine, the Mother. So now we have Father Mother and Son. Now that makes sense. right?
If that is the case, then he wsa not ONE with the Father John19 and God could not be his his FatherThat is what Jesus said when he was a Man. God did not pretend to be a Man He really came as a Man.
I agree!!!The Bible does not have errors.
He came as a Man, and he grew and learned as men do. He was sinless, was tempted in the desert so that he could empathize with our weaknesses.He came as a man. Can you tell us what godly faculties he lost in the process?
I presume that Jesus always existed, not always as a man,
I believe that the Spirit Jesus had while on earth is the Spirit of God, and that when Jesus died, he still lived in the Spirit, and thus raised his flesh body by the Spirit.and knew things, when he was a spirit, or whatever.
I believe that becoming a Man is to be made lesser. He made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.Does the process of gods turning into men cause amnesia or some lost of omniscience?
Ciao
- viole
haha.... now now, calm down mine ***** cat... hahaI do not doubt the writing of it. I have no reason to. I never ever said "they don't know what they were writing". I have always said "the original meaning has been lost". I talk and talk and talk about it because I KNOW that what is lost can be found. Have I ever said "all original meaning is lost"? No! Not that either. Men! God will they ever learn to listen?
Why do you go beyond what is written? The scriptures say God is the Father, not the Mother.The Spirit, now combined with the masculine lord, is now in Greek neuter, and yet in the OT spirit was feminine. So now we see that the Holy Spirit is the feminine, the Mother. So now we have Father Mother and Son. Now that makes sense. right?
He came as a Man, and he grew and learned as men do. He was sinless, was tempted in the desert so that he could empathize with our weaknesses.
I believe that Jesus existed in heaven as God made visible before coming to earth in a flesh body, and that the body Jesus had in heaven was the glorified body that we will all receive at the resurrection, except that Jesus had this body First in heaven, and then again when he returned to heaven.
I believe that the Spirit Jesus had while on earth is the Spirit of God, and that when Jesus died, he still lived in the Spirit, and thus raised his flesh body by the Spirit.
I believe that becoming a Man is to be made lesser. He made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
Oh. and they change the subject too. And I am only talking from experience. The women I know listen. The men I know don't.haha.... now now, calm down mine ***** cat... haha
What is this ''men''? Was it not Eve that was fooled in the garden because she did not listen? I do not think that it is wrong. You read in things which are not always necessary I think.
I believe the glorified is the kind of body we will receive at the resurrection. For one thing, t is a body that is immortal.If Jeaus had a glorified body, whatever that means,
Yes, because the Father's body is Jesus' body.and Jesus = Father, does that mean that The Father has a glorified body as well?
If not. Why not?
Ciao
- viole
You keep giving only worthless opinions without any knowledge about a Book that SAYS to understand the Book you must obey.
Do you understand how vulgar your comments our to a believer?
And I might add, you are wrong.
Your mistake is to think that just because you don't know, know one else does
God the Father is invisible and lives in unapproachable light; Jesus is God the Son with a body; and the Holy Spirit is given without limit and is all around us and lives inside the saved.When God came as Jesus was the universe then without God's presence as The Holy Spirit?
would have thought considering what has happened in France, there might be a bit more respect.
God does not reveal His Truth to those who go to college and study.That's the problem I do know. Its why I went to universities to study this at a higher level then untrained bias opinion.
I can prove easily that what I say is true.That is not true.
To understand the bible one needs to have a credible education. Without it your literally blind.
And your only providing a red herring to cover up your unsubstantiated claims of having self proclaimed knowledge.
God does not reveal His Truth to those who go to college and study.
God hides the truth from the wise and learned.