I do not agree that being of "holy divine nature" is the same as being God. We are also commanded to be holy. We are also sent out to "be disciples".
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Being holy isn't the same thing as having a divine nature.I do not agree that being of "holy divine nature" is the same as being God. We are also commanded to be holy. We are also sent out to "be disciples".
God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit, and Jesus is the Son.God is God and Jesus is his prophet
very simple
once you start deifying people it becomes impossible to decide which of the many deified humans are actually gods
is it krishna? jesus? the pharaohs? alexander scriabin?
God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit, and Jesus is the Son.
Very simple.
Once you realize that it wasn't that a human being was deified, but that God became Incarnate, it becomes possible to divorce they mythos of Christianity from that of other systems.
Being holy isn't the same thing as having a divine nature.
Huh?The problem with that is God is a man before God even created Man.
"Holy" means "separated out." That's simply not the same thing as having a divine nature.Oh brother. Divine means Of, from, or like God. Isn't it?
Huh?
Where is it ever said that God is a man before creation?
God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit, and Jesus is the Son.
"Holy" means "separated out." That's simply not the same thing as having a divine nature.
God is Father, Son, Holy Spirit, and Jesus is the Son.
Very simple.
Once you realize that it wasn't that a human being was deified, but that God became Incarnate, it becomes possible to divorce they mythos of Christianity from that of other systems.
Buddha isn't an incarnation of Vishnu, so far as I'm aware. Krishna was the 8th incarnation of Vishnu. But that's a different mythos than God Incarnate.but Krishna, Buddha and the many other avatars of Vishnu are also called 'God incarnate'
if i was going to believe in incarnation i would have a lot of supposed incarnations to choose from
Jesus was only a man when he became Incarnate.1. The Father is the uncreated Person of God
2. The Son is with The Father from the beginning, thus also uncreated
3. Jesus is the same as The Son, who is uncreated.
4. Jesus was a man
5. The man Jesus existed before any man did.
Jesus was only a man when he became Incarnate.
Buddha isn't an incarnation of Vishnu, so far as I'm aware. Krishna was the 8th incarnation of Vishnu. But that's a different mythos than God Incarnate.
The Son is God. Jesus is the Son. Jesus is God.OK So "Jesus" is NOT God because God is before the beginning but "Jesus" is not from before the beginning.
Form wiki answers:WIKIPEDIA: The Buddha in Hinduism is viewed as an Avatar of Vishnu. Many Hindu texts including Bhagavata Purana, Bhavishya Purana, Narasimha Purana etc. enlist the Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu.
from my perspective, the only significant difference between the 'incarnation' through Christ and the 'manifestation' through the avatars of Vishnu is that there are many avatars and only one incarnation
incarnation and avatar seem like different words for the same thing, just like 'God' and 'Allah' and 'Yahweh'
but if i were to believe in incarnation i would have no reason to believe that there was only one incarnation; i would have no compelling reason to favor Jesus over Krishna and Buddha
Xy draws a distinction between Incarnation and "manifestation."WIKIPEDIA: The Buddha in Hinduism is viewed as an Avatar of Vishnu. Many Hindu texts including Bhagavata Purana, Bhavishya Purana, Narasimha Purana etc. enlist the Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu.
from my perspective, the only significant difference between the 'incarnation' through Christ and the 'manifestation' through the avatars of Vishnu is that there are many avatars and only one incarnation
incarnation and avatar seem like different words for the same thing, just like 'God' and 'Allah' and 'Yahweh'
but if i were to believe in incarnation i would have no reason to believe that there was only one incarnation; i would have no compelling reason to favor Jesus over Krishna and Buddha