Sure we could be significant if God gives us a job.isn't that a slave mentality?
even a slave is significant...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sure we could be significant if God gives us a job.isn't that a slave mentality?
even a slave is significant...
So, do you believe that people are completely insignificant in the scheme of things? If so, why?
i enjoy life, but i find no significance to our existance. once were all gone it will be like we were never here in the first place. the only thing i can do is appreciate the here and now and marvel at the fact that we even exist in the first place.
if theres any reason to exist in the first place, it has to be to appreciate all thats around us, i cant think of another reason
indeed.I reject the belief that it was created by a God at all, so for someone to claim it was created for us would to me seem to be an extraordinary yet unsubstantiated claim, building on the first unsubstantiated claim.
I'm lost.
By saying it is hubris to assume we can compare ourselves to the universe, do you mean because we are insignificant? That's how I read it, and if so then you're saying that significance lends meaning to the comparison, and to hubris --in the picture you draw we are insignificant before a comparison even begins. That starting place of insignificance is, in my opinion, a type of hubris, albeit one of deflation rather than inflation.we are talking about comparing...which gives meaning to significance
which is how one can measure deflation
but it is sheer hubris that one would assume we can compare ourselves to the universe because we are not comparable to it.
as i posited in an earlier post, a bee is comparable to us because in the scheme of our existence they matter...yet they don't matter when it comes to a black hole, so then why would we?
yes.By saying it is hubris to assume we can compare ourselves to the universe, do you mean because we are insignificant? That's how I read it,
yes.and if so then you're saying that significance lends meaning to the comparison,
and to hubris --in the picture you draw we are insignificant before a comparison even begins.
it's the giving ourselves a sense of significance that we can even begin to compare ourselves to the universe, as a way of displaying our prideThat starting place of insignificance is, in my opinion, a type of hubris, albeit one of deflation rather than inflation.
But that would seem to be the opposite ofyes.
yes.
absolutely
I said in my first post, I think it is as much hubris to think ourselves insigificant as significant (though I recognize that "humbling" has its mundane usage).now isn't that a humbling stance?
In my opinion, humbling does away with hubris.it's the giving ourselves a sense of significance that we can even begin to compare ourselves to the universe, as a way of displaying our pride
or undue importance
that's why i brought up being a mother...But that would seem to be the opposite of
we are talking about comparing...which gives meaning to significance
which is how one can measure deflation
...which is why I was getting confused.
I said in my first post, I think it is as much hubris to think ourselves insigificant as significant (though I recognize that "humbling" has its mundane usage).
But maybe that's just me.
Which is...?when i say humbling i mean our default position...
I wasn't talking about the significance or insignificance of a comparison, I was talking about a comparison that results in your (our) insignificance.that's why i brought up being a mother...
a mother can't compare her motherhood to how a race car driver drives.
there is no comparison and therefor an insignificant comparison
Which is...?
(Insignificance? :no
I wasn't talking about the significance or insignificance of a comparison, I was talking about a comparison that results in your (our) insignificance.
"I am not worthy."
"I am small."
"I am limited."
"I am flawed."
If you begin from that point you've already made a comparison and you are the result.
Your relating our significance with our ability to effect various parts of the universe. In this sense earth is insignificant and the Milky Way wouldn't miss our little planet in the scheme of things. We will always be insignificant in someones perspective if they never come in contact with us but it doesn't make it so overall. If we had the ability to destroy a neighboring star would that make humans worth more? That being said we have come to a point in technology where we can start sending out waves and satellites and even microbes into the vastness of space so the culmination has become something of great potential. What is happening on this little planet could eventually still have an impact but in the end is still insignificant since the it will eventually all end in a cold death which brings me to nihilism.our significance in the universe in not even comparable to the significance of a black hole...people like me have been born and die everyday yet life goes on. that isn't insignificant on my level of understanding because i can rationalize and reason the significance as that affects my life...
what else affects my life...the sun, the stars and the moon all these things affect me, yet i am insignificant to them because i do not effect the stars the sun or the moon.
But some of us have healthy egos.if all of us had the same understanding that
we are not worthy
we are small
we are limited
and we are flawed
because we all live on a tiny planet
then there is no room for deflation
But some of us have healthy egos.
(i.e. not deflated)
Just to reiterate, I'm saying that once you've reached the point ofno, really? :sarcastic
it's not the contact it's how we affect them...Your relating our significance with our ability to effect various parts of the universe. In this sense earth is insignificant and the Milky Way wouldn't miss our little planet in the scheme of things. We will always be insignificant in someones perspective if they never come in contact with us but it doesn't make it so overall.
i don't think so...how does it affect us if we did...? knowing we can and doing it means nothing unless there was an affect...If we had the ability to destroy a neighboring star would that make humans worth more?
but the state of nihilism isn't a apart of our existence right now...and that is significant to usThat being said we have come to a point in technology where we can start sending out waves and satellites and even microbes into the vastness of space so the culmination has become something of great potential. What is happening on this little planet could eventually still have an impact but in the end is still insignificant since the it will eventually all end in a cold death which brings me to nihilism.