sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
This makes The Far Side seem mundane and predictable.Not that it matters. Seriously.
We've reached through the funny papers to a whole new kind of crazy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This makes The Far Side seem mundane and predictable.Not that it matters. Seriously.
We've reached through the funny papers to a whole new kind of crazy.
May I propose a better alternative that will make everybody happy? What about turning everyone into a high efficiency converter of photons into the energy our organisms need?
We could all feed from the sun, and avoid things like defecation that might be inappropriate in places like Heaven.
What do you think of the idea?
I don't see where it says "whales are carnivorous."
K'. Where in the bible does it say any of this? Chapter and verse, please -- and no "inferences." I wanna see it verbatim, otherwise, it ain't in there!Dear sojourner, That is WHY God tells us to STUDY to show ourselves approved unto God, a workman who needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. 2Ti 2:15
Put the word Whale in Google and read what they eat. Whales are NOT from the water EXCEPT when you trace ALL creatures back to the first common ancestor, Bacteria, which appeared on our Planet some 3.7 Billion years ago, in Water, at God's Command, exactly as God tells us in Gen 1:21. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Except that's not what those verses say. Isaiah is about an earthquake that happens in the future,
and 2 Peter references the water in creation (before anything else was created). Unless you're twisting things, which is entirely possible.
Aman, your posts are increasingly sounding like Cliff Claven. Only his "explanations" are a lot more plausible.[/quote]In Love,
Aman
K'. Where in the bible does it say any of this? Chapter and verse, please -- and no "inferences." I wanna see it verbatim, otherwise, it ain't in there!
You replied:Except that's not what those verses say. Isaiah is about an earthquake that happens in the future
Except that your post referenced Isaiah 24:19 and either one mentions a flood -- only an earthquake.False, since Isa 24:18 speaks of the SNARE, the Trap, the Flood
You reply:references the water in creation (before anything else was created).
But you are wrong, because Genesis actually says:False
But Genesis actually says that light was created first -- not air.He created Hydrogen and Oxygen in the Heaven (Heb-Air), which was the FIRST Creation Element God spoke into being.
Asked and answered. And I don't use the KJ; the NRSV is more accurate.Let's see you refute that, Scripturally, and please use the KJV please.
Read it again, Skeezix. I never said water was created.Thanks for showing us the verse which says that water was "created".
Aman, your posts are increasingly sounding like Cliff Claven. Only his "explanations" are a lot more plausible.
Here is the verse in Blue with my words in Black. Otherwise, you won't know what I see the verse as saying.
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, (land dwelling Ungulates) and every living creature that moveth, (which includes prehistoric man) which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, (God, Elohim, the Trinity kind) and every winged fowl after His kind: (the kind Jesus made with His own Hands) and God saw that it was good. (Perfect)
God's kinds are those creatures which came forth from the water Naturally (As Science teaches). Jesus made other creatures from the dust of the Earth, including Humans, Gen 2:7 who could have children with prehistoric people, whose origin was in the water. Gen 6:1-4 That is HOW He produced some SEVEN Billion Humans, on Planet Earth, which He will use to fill the THIRD Heaven with Immortal Humans, thanks to Jesus.
No whales. No meat-eating whales. Your entire post was nothing but baseless inference.And God said, “Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the dome of the sky.” 21 So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, of every kind, with which the waters swarm, and every winged bird of every kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them, saying, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.” 23 And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day.
24 And God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures of every kind: cattle and creeping things and wild animals of the earth of every kind.” And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals of the earth of every kind, and the cattle of every kind, and everything that creeps upon the ground of every kind. And God saw that it was good.
Here's the actual biblical quote without your inferences, which I expressly requested you to omit:
No whales. No meat-eating whales. Your entire post was nothing but baseless inference.
Good job (not).
Here is what Mr Amans self proclaimed preferred version of the Bible, the KJV, ACTUALLY says:Gen 1:21[/URL] And God created great whales, (land dwelling Ungulates) and every living creature that moveth, (which includes prehistoric man) which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, (God, Elohim, the Trinity kind) and every winged fowl after His kind: (the kind Jesus made with His own Hands) and God saw that it was good. (Perfect)
Dear readers,
Here is what Mr Aman claims the The Bible says:
Here is what Mr Amans self proclaimed preferred version of the Bible, the KJV, ACTUALLY says:
Genesis 1:21It is clear that Mr Aman is in direct violation of Revelation 22:18:
And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Revelation 22:18I see no indication using the 20/20 method (twenty verses before to twenty verses after) that indicate you may add to the words as long as you put what you add in parenthesis, does any one else?
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Does it seem odd to anyone else that when Sonofason is here, Aman777 is not....
I'm not saying they're the same person....but....
Oh look Aman777 is online now, and so am I. Oh well, I guess you are wrong again. You're probably getting used to that, right?
Dear Mestemia, HOW do you suppose I should tell someone what I see the words as saying? IF I just posted Scripture, you would complain that I was just posting Scripture. In fact, just like the Rupublicans, you have NOTHING but Negativism to offer, from a buggy Atheistic view. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
It's the NRSV -- one of the best, most accurate translations on the planet. Which is likely why you've never heard of it.Dear sojourner, Sorry, but I have spent too much time looking for your Version of Scripture. Are you ashamed to tell us what it is? Is it the one your group prefers because it fits their ideas? Or is it the Altered and Parahrased product of your own denomination? God Bless you.
BTW, I just read the rest of your posts and they all have the SAME problem. Which Version of Scripture are you using? which does NOT agree with the original texts?
In Love,
Aman
But you're not saying, "this is what I see the words as saying." You're claiming that "this is what the words are saying. You claim to interpret the texts literalistic ally -- which means "they say what they say." You don't get to come along later and claim, "This is the meaning behind the words."Dear Mestemia, HOW do you suppose I should tell someone what I see the words as saying? IF I just posted Scripture, you would complain that I was just posting Scripture. In fact, just like the Rupublicans, you have NOTHING but Negativism to offer, from a buggy Atheistic view. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
It's the NRSV -- one of the best, most accurate translations on the planet. Which is likely why you've never heard of it.
You wouldn't know an "original text" if it showed up on your Playstation.
Again: to what "group" of mine do you refer?